|
Details
Title |
Linkage Fees and Inclusionary Zoning |
Highlights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The author contends the Florida Development of Regional Impact law is ineffective at producing affordable housing.
|
|
|
The author contends local inclusionary housing ordinances are more effective and cost less to implement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The author contends the Florida Development of Regional Impact law is ineffective at producing affordable housing. |
|
|
The author contends local inclusionary housing ordinances are more effective and cost less to implement. |
|
|
Description |
Jaimie Ross writes that smart growth laws can have a negative impact on affordable housing if specific provisions are not made to provide for such housing. The author cites Florida’s 1985 Growth Management Act as an example of how states can require local governments to ensure an adequate supply of affordable housing. Ross describes incentives local governments can use, including waiving or paying impact fees, expediting permitting for affordable housing, linkage fees, and inclusionary zoning ordinances. A number of features about linkage fees and inclusionary zoning ordinances are discussed. Ross reviews the Development of Regional Impact (DRI) process that requires large commercial developments to ensure affordable housing for employees. The process, designed to operate as a combination linkage fee and inclusionary zoning ordinance, has been largely ineffective at creating affordable housing. Ross suggests that a local inclusionary zoning ordinance would be more effective at providing affordable housing and argues that such an ordinance would cost less to implement. |
Publication Date |
2000 |
Organization |
1000 Friends of Florida |
Web Location | http://www.1000friendsofflorida.org/%5Cold_affordable_housing%5Cgrowing_smarter.asp |
Feedback: Please contact
us if you have a similar experience.
Notice: The contents of this record reflect
the views of the author and/or promulgating municipality, and should
not be construed as representing the views or policies of the U.S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development or U.S. HUD's Office
of Policy Development and Research. No attempt has been made by
U.S. HUD or its contractors to verify the accuracy, currency, or
validity of the record contents presented herein.
|
|