 |
Regulatory Barriers Database
| Note: Many
records in our database contain more than one type of barrier and/or solution.
When searching within a particular category, we've purposely limited the
highlight (summary) results to only those which specifically relate to
your request. However, when you look for results based on more general,
non-category-specific searches, you'll often see multiple icons (and highlights)
displayed. |
Search Criteria
Topics: Planning & Growth Restrictions
Results: 206 Matches
141. Spokane Municipal Code
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Washington |
Spokane |
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
Spokane requires that public facilities be available for each new development or requires the developer to provide those facilities. |
| |
|
|
|
142. Impact Fees: Let the Courts be the Judge
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Georgia |
Atlanta |
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact fees and other growth restrictions can actually lead to increasing sprawl as developers seek land and friendlier government climates in which to meet expanding housing demands.
|
| |
|
|
|
143. 'Smart Growth' Cuts Back Affordable Housing
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
NATIONAL |
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The authors argue that Smart Growth policies limit the supply of and increase the cost of housing. |
| |
|
|
|
144. Correcting The Record: Comparing development policy in Portland, Oregon and Atlanta, Georgia
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Georgia |
Atlanta |
| |
Oregon |
Portland |
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A noted researcher claimed that Smart Growth policies do not have any benefits to the community. |
| |
|
|
|
145. Growth Management Revisited: A Reassessment of its Efficacy, Price Effects, and Impacts on Metropolitan Growth Patters
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
California |
|
| |
NATIONAL |
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some argue that growth control ordinances restrict and therefore increase the price of land and housing |
| |
|
|
|
146. Removing Regulatory Barriers to Affordable Housing: How States and Localities Are Moving Ahead
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
NATIONAL |
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local planning in Oregon was haphazard and inconsistent and often did not address housing needs. |
| |
|
|
|
147. State of Colorado Consolidated Plan
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Colorado |
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intergovernmental agreements set the tone for future annexation, utility extension and other expanded public services. |
| |
|
|
|
148. The Truth About Regulatory Barriers to Housing Affordability
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
NATIONAL |
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By restricting land available for development, growth management policies increase the price of land and increase the cost to develop affordable housing. |
| |
|
|
|
149. Arizona Incentives for Affordable Housing Task Force: Final Report
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Arizona |
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local and county jurisdictions are not required to add affordable housing goals and strategies as an element to their comprehensive plans.
|
| |
|
|
|
150. Summit Airs Southland’s Housing Pinch
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
California |
Los Angeles |
| |
California |
Orange County |
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excessive land use regulations can discourage the development of affordable housing. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Back to Top 
