 |
Regulatory Barriers Database
| Note: Many
records in our database contain more than one type of barrier and/or solution.
When searching within a particular category, we've purposely limited the
highlight (summary) results to only those which specifically relate to
your request. However, when you look for results based on more general,
non-category-specific searches, you'll often see multiple icons (and highlights)
displayed. |
Search Criteria
Topics: Planning & Growth Restrictions
Results: 206 Matches
161. San Diego's Affordable Housing Dilemma
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
California |
San Diego |
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
The author implies that the growth control policies of government agencies serve as a primary barrier to constructing a natural supply of "for-sale" houses. |
| |
|
|
|
162. Barriers To Affordable Housing (Will County, Illinois)
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Indiana |
Will County |
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A lack of infrastructure in undeveloped areas hinders the development potential of this land. |
| |
|
|
|
163. Smart Growth May Not Be So Smart After All
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Georgia |
Atlanta |
| |
Oregon |
Portland |
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The authors argue that growth restrictions in the name of "smart growth" are not as beneficial as they seem. |
| |
|
|
|
164. 2003 Appomattox County Comprehensive Plan
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Virginia |
Appomattox County |
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is implied that disorganized growth hinders the development of a coherent affordable housing strategy. |
| |
|
|
|
165. How Can Impact Fees Help Achieve Smart Growth?
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
New Jersey |
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impact fees, if poorly created and administered, can actually exacerbate sprawl. |
| |
|
|
|
166. Impact of Government Regulations and Fees on Housing Costs
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
Washington |
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The authors say urban growth boundaries limit the amount of developable land and decrease the availability of housing. |
| |
|
|
|
167. Smart Growth
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
California |
San Jose |
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is implicit recognition that planning policies can potentially impact the development of affordable housing.
|
| |
|
|
|
168. Cities Under Pressure: Local Growth Controls and Residential Development Policy
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
California |
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The authors observe that growth issues are volatile, with businesses and realtors wanting more growth, and residents pushing for slower growth. |
| |
|
|
|
169. Meeting the Challenges of Growth: On Common Ground, Realtors and Smart Growth
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
NATIONAL |
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growth management policy may overly restrict the supply of developable land that can limit housing choice and make homes less affordable.
|
| |
|
|
|
170. Final Report of the Task Force on Housing Costs
|
|
|
| Location(s): |
NATIONAL |
|
Highlights
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The authors contend that no-growth regulations have constrained land supply severely, particularly for low and moderate-income housing. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
Back to Top 
