This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.


UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
         Plaintiff,

                  v.

IMETAL,
DBK MINERALS, INC.,
ENGLISH CHINA CLAYS, PLC, and   
ENGLISH CHINA CLAYS, INC.,
     
         Defendants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         
Civil No: 99 1018 GK


ORDER

WHEREAS, on April 14, 2000 Heritage Plastics, Inc. filed a Motion to Intervene, or in the Alternative to Appear as Amicus Curiae in this proceeding; and

WHEREAS, Plaintiff United States of America and the defendants opposed both Heritage's motion;

Therefore, upon consideration of the motion and the opposition thereto, it is this ____ day of __________, 2000,

ORDERED, that the Motion of Heritage Plastics, Inc. to Intervene Or, In the Alternative, To Appear As Amicus Curiae, is hereby denied.

  _______________________________
Gladys Kessler
United States District Judge

Copies to:

Patricia G. Chick
U.S. Department of Justice
Antitrust Division
1401 H Street NW, Suite 3000
Washington, DC 20530

George M. Chester, Jr., Esquire
Covington & Burling
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20004-7566

Christopher E. Ondeck, Esquire
Jenkins & Gilchrist
1919 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Suite 600
Washington, D.C. 20006