|
|
FY95 Great Lakes Program Priorities and Funding Process
- PURPOSE
- FY95 PRIORITIES
- GLNPO ACTIVITIES AND FUNDING
- ROADMAP OF OTHER EPA GREAT LAKES PROGRAMS
- Regional Water Programs
- Air Program
- Regional RCRA Program
- Regional Pesticides/Toxic Substances Programs
- Environmental Education Grants
- Great Lakes Research Program
- Attachment 1: Application Instructions for GLNPO
Preproposals
- Attachment 2: GLNPO Request for
Preproposals
- Attachment 3: Preproposal Information
Cover Sheet
- Attachment 4: Multiple Preproposal
Summary Sheet
FY95 GREAT LAKES PROGRAM
PRIORITIES AND FUNDING PROCESS
In 1992, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA),
the eight Great Lakes States, five Federal agencies, and the
Chippewa/Ottawa Treaty Fishery Management Authority, completed the
Great Lakes 5-Year Strategy - Protecting the Great Lakes: Our
Environmental Goals and How We Plan to Achieve Them. The Great
Lakes National Program Office (GLNPO) issues this annual Great
Lakes Program Priorities and Funding Process (Great Lakes PFP) as a
means of coordinating management of the Great Lakes resource. This
Great Lakes PFP is a part of the ecosystem management approach
which assists implementation of the 5-Year Strategy.
5 YEAR STRATEGY GOALS
- Reduce toxic substances, with an emphasis on persistent,
bioaccumulative substances.
- Protect and restore vital habitats.
- Protect biological integrity; restore and maintain diverse
living populations.
In March 1994, as part of what Agency officials have termed the
"Edgewater Consensus," senior EPA leaders recommended that the
Agency:
align our policy, regulatory, institutional, and
administrative infrastructure to support ecosystem protection...
develop information and tools to facilitate the approach; and...
reorient the Agency's culture to facilitate a place-driven
approach.
We in the Great Lakes are already taking this approach.
Place-based ecosystem efforts in the Great Lakes, such as LAMPs and
RAPs, are early candidates for a list of ecosystem demonstration
projects being identified as part of the Edgewater focus. We desire
to continue this progress. By providing this Great Lakes PFP, GLNPO
seeks to:
- provide program and funding guidance in advance of the
operating cycles so that State and Tribal agencies have sufficient
time to prepare grant proposals in concert with other program
planning activities;
- achieve agreement on joint priorities so that participating
agencies in the Five Year Strategy can use them in internal
planning and so that grant proposals can be targeted at
opportunities for the most significant environmental improvement;
- minimize competition among applicants for resources and
maximize the opportunity for developing joint partnerships between
agencies and non-governmental organizations to achieve common
environmental objectives; and
- reduce the administrative burden associated with competing for
individual project grants at various, unpredictable times
throughout the funding cycle.
The FY95 Great Lakes Program Priorities and Funding Process does
not replace general USEPA National guidance or guidance developed by
the Regional Program Offices. Rather, the Great Lakes PFP is a
supplement to the annual planning process and should be used to
facilitate planning Great Lakes activities in concert with broader
State program planning efforts. The Great Lakes PFP is also intended
to provide the linkage between the Great Lakes program and base Air,
Water, Waste, and Pesticide/Toxic Substances programs.
Through holistic total resource management, the Great Lakes
program seeks to reduce the greatest risks to human and ecological
health; a mission directly reflected in the environmental goals
established in the 5-Year Strategy. Participants in the December 7,
1993 Great Lakes planning meeting concurred that these goals of the
partner organizations were still correct. Consequently, during
Fiscal Year 1995 (FY95) USEPA will emphasize the following Great
Lakes priorities:
Reducing Toxic Pollution
- State adoption of water quality standards, antidegradation
policies, and implementation procedures consistent with the
Great Lakes Water Quality Guidance.
- Reducing sources of toxic substances through the Great Lakes
Toxics Reduction Effort, with an emphasis on bioaccumulative
chemicals of concern.
- Virtual Elimination. Evaluate persistent, bioaccumulative, and
toxic substance uses and further reduction opportunities for
targeted pollutants (mercury and PCBs) utilizing pollution
prevention; identify and address existing program gaps/barriers to
reducing nonpoint sources of toxicants.
- Lake Michigan Mass Balance Study. Complete principal field
monitoring as a first phase in determining relative loading rates
of toxic substances based on mass balance modeling. The study will
ultimately guide further load reduction efforts and contribute to
regulation and policy development.
- Pathways Approach. Continue the multi-media effort to identify
and address the primary nonpoint source pathways
(including air deposition, sediments, spills, urban runoff/cso's,
and waste sites) of toxicants into the Great
Lakes.
- Assisting States in developing the Great Lakes Regional Air
Toxics Emissions Inventory to quantify toxic emissions and
establish relative loads.
- Implement specific load reduction actions with an emphasis on
reducing air emissions and non-point sources (including
contaminated sediment sources) of persistent bioaccumulative
pollutants. Target remedial actions at sources of these pollutants
based on risk within Lake watersheds. Associated priorities
include:
- Lake Michigan. Consistent with the workplan and
schedule approved by the Lake Michigan LaMP management team,
implement activities to prevent, reduce and/or remediate
impaired uses by identifying sources and quantifying loads of
Critical Pollutants through intensive integrated air, open
water, tributary, sediment, and biological monitoring; modeling;
and emissions inventories.
- Lake Ontario. Consistent with the Lake Ontario
workplan and schedule, continue to identify sources, and reduce
or eliminate loads of pollutants of concern.
- Lake Superior. Consistent with the workplan and
schedule approved by the Lake Superior LaMP management team,
implement activities to prevent, reduce, and/or remediate
impaired uses by continuing implementation of the zero discharge
demonstration, special protection designations, the development
of an integrated monitoring plan, and protection and restoration
of important habitat.
- Lake Erie. Consistent with the workplan and schedule
approved by the Lake Erie LaMP management team, implement
activities to prevent, reduce and/or remediate impaired uses by
completing problem assessment and identifying beneficial use
impairments, refining the list of critical pollutants, and
continuing source identification and load quantification as part
of LaMP development. Identify and begin implementing load
reduction actions.
- Continue activities to reduce toxic substances and
protect/restore beneficial uses in the Areas of Concern (AOCs)
through focused and coordinated implementation of all relevant
Federal, State, and local media programs. Identify gaps in media
programs.
- Target multi-media regulatory and non-regulatory actions to
achieve risk-based environmental improvements through the Niagara
Frontier, Northwest Indiana, Southeast Michigan, and Saginaw
River/Bay Geographic Initiatives.
- Target high priority AOCs and associated watersheds for
identification and reduction of pollutant loadings from
contaminated sediments through application of regulatory
authorities and cooperative approaches. Provide technical
assistance including:
- Contaminated sediment assessments utilizing procedures
adopted under the Assessment and Remediation of Contaminated
Sediments Program.
- Coordinating regional efforts and assistance at the Federal,
State, Tribal, and local levels in implementing
contaminated sediment remediation projects.
- Correct discharge or emission violations which pose direct
threats to human health or the health of the ecosystem through
continued implementation of the Great Lakes Enforcement Strategy.
- Enhance pollution prevention actions in targeted industrial
sectors and geographic areas.
Protecting and Restoring Habitats
- Restore/protect important habitat within the Great Lakes.
Targeted efforts should be consistent with, but are not limited
to, those identified in The Nature Conservancy's report (funded in
part by USEPA and developed with Federal, State, and private
partners): The Conservation of Biological Diversity in the Great
Lakes Ecosystem: Issues and Opportunities. Associated priorities
include:
- Demonstrate practices for protecting and restoring aquatic,
terrestrial, and transitional habitats through
re-vegetation with native plant species.
- Restore wetland hydrology on previously converted wetlands.
- Establish spawning habitat for native fish species.
- Establish/implement LaMP priorities to restore important
habitat and fisheries resources.
Supporting Federal-State-Tribal Partnership
- Improve State and Tribal capability to address Great Lakes
environmental problems through a cross-program approach based on
environmental information.
- Provide broad access (including Federal and State agencies) to
a common environmental database and analytical tools, facilitating
Federal/State/Tribal information exchange.
In identifying and carrying out activities consistent with the
above priorities, maximum flexibility and support will be given
to the States and Tribes to address the pollutants causing the
highest risk, areas being subjected to the greatest environmental
stress, and the causes of that stress. USEPA will continue to work
closely with the States and Tribes to target
and support the base programs. Further, the Agency commits to making
necessary adjustments in program commitments in order to ensure the
successful implementation of actions to protect the Great Lakes.
III. GLNPO ACTIVITIES AND
FUNDING
GLNPO Grant Process
- Recommended joint FY95 priorities. December
(State/Tribes/USEPA: "Partners")
- Confirm priorities. (Partners) March
- Issue Great Lakes PFP. (GLNPO) June
- Deliver Preproposals for review. September (Applicants)
- Complete review. Request full January application
packages (GLNPO)
- Deliver completed application March packages.
(Applicants)
- Projected award date. (USEPA) June
At the end of 1993, GLNPO had $5.3 million in grants in place
pursuant to its previously issued guidance. Projects were funded for
habitat ($3.45 million), contaminated sediments ($800 thousand),
pollution prevention ($800 thousand), and state capacity ($280
thousand). Grants for monitoring and other purposes totalled $3.5
million. Under the terms of the FY95 Great Lakes PFP, GLNPO is again
making "venture capital" available for important, innovative
projects beneficial to the Great Lakes ecosystem. The Roadmap of
Other EPA Great Lakes Programs (section IV of this document)
references other possibilities for USEPA assistance to Great Lakes
related activities.
Assistance Process. The annual GLNPO assistance process
(figure at right) begins with a December meeting of State and
Federal mid-level managers to develop recommendations for their
senior managers. (An additional dimension to the FY96 planning
meeting will be expanded participation and a closer focus on
Lake-specific priorities.) Once priorities are determined,
preproposals1 are requested for projects supporting the priorities.
Targeted Assistance for Contaminated Sediments, Habitat, State
Capacity, and Pollution Prevention. Great Lakes planning
meeting participants concluded in December, 1993 that programs
should continue to be guided by the goals established in the Great
Lakes Five Year Strategy and that contaminated sediments, habitat
protection/restoration, and pollution prevention
continued to be appropriate priorities for GLNPO. For FY95, GLNPO is
targeting $3.29 million2 in assistance to States,
Indian Nations, and our other partners for projects implementing
these same priorities. $490 thousand is reserved for State
Capacity assistance. The remaining $2.8 million is targeted for
projects in contaminated sediments ($1.5 million), habitat ($1
million), and pollution prevention ($300 thousand). Because the
maximum flexibility GLNPO is afforded by the Agency will be used in
selecting projects which are the highest priorities for the Great
Lakes ecosystem, the relative distribution of funding
totals for projects in each of these categories may vary
significantly from these targets. See attachments 1 and 2 for
information regarding GLNPO's FY95 request for preproposals and
instructions.
Preproposals submitted to USEPA will be evaluated based upon the
criteria contained in Attachment 2. GLNPO seeks to fund projects
which (i) are not eligible for other Federal funding or (ii) are
leveraged with other funding sources. Evaluations will
take into account any recommendations on specific Lake needs which
may be provided by the States and Indian Nations, as well as any
input received from Lakewide Management Plan and Remedial Action
Plan workgroups. In evaluating preproposals, GLNPO will be working
closely with State and Tribal participants involved in Lakewide
management planning.
Other GLNPO Programs. Although GLNPO is not seeking
preproposals via this document in the areas referenced below,
GLNPO will coordinate at the Federal, State, Tribal, and local
levels to ensure that projects and resources are appropriately
targeted to achieve mutual objectives. GLNPO staff are also
available for consultation in these areas.
- Monitoring. Through atmospheric deposition
monitoring and open lake monitoring in each Great Lake for
toxicant and
nutrient loadings and concentrations (using EPA's research
vessels), GLNPO will provide trend and baseline data to support
and target remedial efforts and measure environmental progress.
GLNPO and partners will continue enhanced monitoring of air, open
water, tributaries, sediments, and biota for Lake Michigan and may
begin planning for similar work to be carried out in subsequent
years in an additional Lake basin. These efforts will allow
assessment of remedial options and design of load reduction
strategies. Additional information is available from Paul Horvatin
(312-353-3612), Chief of GLNPO's Surveillance and Research Staff.
- Data Management. GLNPO and its partners are
establishing an integrated, accessible data management system, one
component of which is a system being designed for storing and
managing Lake Michigan mass balance information. Environmental
decision-makers are being provided greater access to Agency
systems. The overall system will facilitate tracking of Great
Lakes environmental health and trends, linking day-to-day
pollution control activities with key environmental indicators. To
improve Great Lakes State connectivity, a steering committee will
allocate $0.3 million for State hardware and software purchases.
Additional information is available from Pranas Pranckevicius
(312-353-3437), Chief of GLNPO's Data Integration Unit.
- Education/Outreach. GLNPO will enhance
communication with constituents regarding Great Lakes priorities
through media opportunities, environmental education initiatives,
increased public involvement, and the R/V Lake Guardian
Cities Tours (including teacher training). Additional information
is available from Philip Hoffman (312-886-7478).
IV. ROADMAP OF OTHER EPA GREAT
LAKES PROGRAMS
The Great Lakes Basin is a priority ecosystem for all of USEPA,
requiring the cooperative efforts of all media programs in order to
achieve the goals of the 5 Year Strategy. The Strategy, built on the
foundation of the Great Lakes Water Quality
Agreement between the US and Canada, guides coordination and
implementation of ecosystem protection and restoration in the Great
Lakes by participating agencies. While the Great Lakes National
Program Office (GLNPO) is the only USEPA program focused solely on
the Great Lakes program, base programs constitute the primary
vehicles for USEPA to implement the 5-Year Strategy. Successfully
restoring and protecting the Great Lakes is dependent on the ability
of Federal, State, and Tribal governments, working with the private
sector, local governments, and non-profit organizations, to
effectively target base program resources on actions that will
eliminate the most significant problems facing the Lakes and their
watersheds.
Because USEPA program elements related to the Great Lakes program
are intertwined and complementary, potentially
inhibiting full involvement by participants in the program, GLNPO
provides this roadmap of EPA Great Lakes programs. The identified
contacts can provide additional information about these programs and
will be helpful to State Water, Air, Waste,
and other programs as they target their Great Lakes activities
during annual program planning processes.
Great Lakes program considerations. Participants in the Great
Lakes Program are, or should be, aware that Great Lakes activities
should not be viewed as "add-on" activities funded through special
budget initiatives; large increases in either dollars or personnel
to carry out Great Lakes priorities are not likely to occur. The
President's FY95 budget proposal does not contain targeted Great
Lakes increases. Existing resource levels will need to be targeted
and effectively leveraged for environmental results in efforts
including base program resources, funding from other agencies, and
public/private partnerships.
The planning and funding processes for all of the Great Lakes
partners will continue to be improved. Consistent with discussions
at the December 7, 1993 Great Lakes Planning Meeting, we started
this process earlier in the year and are exploring mechanisms for
planning and decision-making which will better involve people and
organizations most familiar with the needs and priorities associated
with each of the Lakes.
Regional Water Programs
USEPA Water Program assistance for activities in the Great Lakes
Basin will be targeted to LaMP and RAP development and
implementation and to the Great Lakes Initiative (commitment to
adopting regulations) as part of State program plan development.
Region 5 Water Division (in concert with the Region 5 States) has
negotiated a set of program priorities for FY95, including
commitments for the Great Lakes. The Region has provided planning
targets to the States for FY95 for known and anticipated Clean Water
Act funding sources. At this time, the Region is not soliciting
proposals from other entities, except on a case by case basis. The
Region does expect, however, that the States will include work
necessary to ensure meeting Great Lakes priorities into their FY95
integrated program plans. To the extent that these program plans are
approvable, the funds will be awarded as targeted. Applicants
interested in more information regarding USEPA Region 5's program
should contact Janet Causey for information (312-353-8999).
Region 3 Water Division priorities pertain to: Presque Isle Bay
(investigation of sediment remediation, obtaining additional RAP
data to complete areal extent of use impairment, Stage II RAP
preparation, and initiating remedial actions); Lake Erie LaMP
development (estimating/reporting critical pollutant loadings and
completing/implementing lake and tributary monitoring
plans); Phosphorous Reduction Plans implementation; and the Great
Lakes Initiative (commitment to adopting regulations).
Further information regarding Region 3's program is available from
Charles Sapp (215-597-9096).
EPA Region 2 and the New York State Department of Environmental
Conservation developed a Strategic Plan for FY93, which based on
ecological and human health priorities through the water medium,
identifies the contributing cross-media pollutant sources and the
agency actions needed to deal with them. Updated in FY 94, the Plan
provides a framework for allocating Clean Water Act funding sources
in the State of New York. Discussion of proposed FY95 funding
allocations began in June, 1994. Applicants interested in Region 2's
program should contact Charles Zafonte for information
(212-264-7678).
Air Program
USEPA's Office of Air and Radiation conducts the Great Waters
Program, an integrated media program charged with examining
deposition of air pollutants to the Great Lakes, Chesapeake Bay,
Lake Champlain, and coastal waters. This program includes
monitoring, modeling, emission inventories, effects assessment,
policy development, and other subjects. While most work is conducted
under routine mechanisms, the Great Waters program is open to
leveraging complementary projects with States coordinating with or
through the Regions or GLNPO.
USEPA has designated the Great Lakes a national program for
funding under §105 of the Clean Air Act. Efforts will continue to
focus on Lake Michigan. Approximately $1.3 million should be
available for air toxics source identification and inventory work;
process characterization studies; dispersion, deposition, and
transport modeling; and air toxics monitoring. The core group for
the Great Waters Study (which includes State and Federal
representatives) will determine how this funding will be utilized to
meet mutual objectives. Proposals are not being solicited at this
time. USEPA contacts for additional information are: Carlton Nash
(312-886-6030) and Melissa McCullough (919-541-5646).
Regional RCRA Program
The amount of §3011 funding available to each State has thus far
been based on the number of Treatment and Storage Disposal
Facilities in that State which were in the Great Lakes Basin. Great
Lakes RCRA resources under §3011 ($2.52 million through Region 5,
$90 thousand through Region 3, and $390 thousand through Region 2)
are targeted for the States in FY95. Updated information can be
obtained from the contacts identified below.
Under draft RCRA Criteria, funding for RCRA activities which will
improve the environmental quality of the Great Lakes Basin would
need to be matched by the State, subject to the same matching
provisions as the rest of the §3011 State grants. Highest priority
would be given to accelerating work at sites having an impact or
potential impact on the Great Lakes ecosystem, especially where
toxic substances may be impacting the waters of the Lakes or
tributaries. Activities could
include:
- Increased inspections and enforcement actions.
- Closure work.
- Permitting and corrective action based on priority ranking.
- Waste minimization activities.
- Other activities which the State demonstrates are beneficial
to environmental quality.
- Any grant would need to be related to hazardous waste
activity.
- Pollution prevention and waste minimization a activities3 in
support of Lakewide Management Plans for Lakes
Ontario, Michigan, Superior, and Erie.
Great Lakes RCRA §3011 projects would be incorporated into State
program plans. USEPA contacts for additional information are:
- Region 5: Christine Liszewski (312-353-1442)
- Region 3: Paul Gotthold (215-597-7937)
- Region 2: Andrew Bellina (212-264-0505)
Regional Pesticides/Toxic Substances Programs
USEPA's Pesticides/Toxic Substances Programs have primary
responsibility for programs under TSCA, FIFRA, and EPCRA §313, which
provide for regulation of chemicals (including bioaccumulative
chemicals of concern such as PCBs and certain pesticides) and of
annual reporting by industry of toxic releases. Principal activities
targeted to the Great Lakes which will continue in FY95 include: PCB
equipment phasedown, agricultural clean sweeps4, and 33/50 outreach.
Other activities include performing TRI, promoting the reduced use
of pesticides, including pollution prevention supplemental
environmental projects (SEPs) in our enforcement actions, and
supporting lead-based paint abatement activities. District offices'
assistance includes the coordination of multimedia inspections.
USEPA contacts for additional information are:
- Region 5: Mary Setnicar (312-886-3851);
- Margaret Jones (312-353-5790) (Agricultural Clean Sweeps)
- Region 3: Donald Lott (215-597-9870) (Pesticides)
- Region 2: Fred Kozak (908-321-6769)
Environmental
Education Grants
The 1990 National Environmental Education Act (NEEA) gives USEPA
authority to issue grants to stimulate environmental education by
supporting projects to design, demonstrate, or disseminate
practices, methods, or technologies related to environmental
education or training. Tribal or local education agencies, colleges
or universities, state education or environmental agencies,
nonprofit organization or noncommercial educational broadcasting
entities are eligible to compete for funding under this national
program by submitting pre-applications. Applicants requesting less
than $25,000 apply and compete in EPA's Regional offices; applicants
requesting between $25,000 and $250,000 apply and compete at EPA
Headquarters in Washington, D.C. EPA Headquarters awarded $1.2
million and each Region had $180,000 to award from FY94 funding.
Following a rigorous evaluation process involving internal and
external review applying criteria published in the Federal register,
Region 5 funded 23 projects with its FY94 environmental education
funds. The solicitation notice for FY95 projects under the NEEA
program was published in the Federal Register in May.
Pre-applications will be due October 14, 1994 and awards will be
made in April, 1995.
Applicants for FY95 Great Lakes environmental education projects
are encouraged to submit their pre-applications for review as part
of the Regional and Headquarters' general processes. Although
GLNPO does not separately solicit environmental education projects,
to maximize the number and amount of projects contributing to
environmental education GLNPO may fund some of the Great Lakes
related projects which are submitted to the Regions and Headquarters
under the auspices of the NEEA program.
USEPA contacts for additional information are:
- Headquarters: George Walker (202-260-8619)
- Region 5: Suzanne Saric (312-353-3209)
- Region 3: Bonnie Smith (215-597-9076)
- Region 2: Terry Ippolito (212-264-2980)
Great Lakes Research
Program
The US/Canadian Great Lakes research strategy guides USEPA Great
Lakes research in order that it have an ecosystem focus consistent
with the goals of the Five Year Strategy. Research supports a
risk-based approach, geared to the identification and targeting of
worst case problems for initial emphasis. USEPA's Environmental
Monitoring and Assessment Program plays an essential role in both
identifying regional-scale problems and monitoring to determine
environmental benefits of alternative actions. A foundation is being
developed in the following areas:
- Development of mass balance and food web models to establish
and predict relationships of chemical loadings to residues in
aquatic life and wildlife.
- Development of watershed models to understand and predict the
relationship of watershed conditions and management activities to
loadings to rivers and lakes as input to the mass balance models.
- Determining the ecological effects of exposure to chemicals
and changes in habitat conditions on Great Lakes watersheds,
wetlands, and the Lakes; and model development to determine
targets for loadings reductions.
- Evaluating the impact of new invading species on existing
ecological relationships as well as on the mass balance
predictions of chemical fate and transport.
- Identification and development of indicators and a monitoring
framework for quantitatively measuring the status and
trends of the condition of the Great Lakes ecosystems.
In July, 1994, the Office of Research and Development's
Environmental Research Laboratory in Duluth (ERL-Duluth) expects to
issue a request for preproposals for approximately $2 million in
FY95 funding for characterizing, diagnosing, and predicting relative
risks of anthropogenic activities to Great Lakes ecosystems. Areas
of interest will include watershed characterization, habitat, fish
and wildlife population dynamics, exotic species, and extrapolation.
The ERL-Duluth request is geographically limited to institutions
in Great Lakes states. Only non-profit institutions, such as
institutions of higher learning and state and tribal governments,
may apply as lead organizations; federal agencies and for-profit
institutions are not eligible. A cost-share minimum of 5% of the
total project cost applies.
USEPA's contact for additional information is Steven Hedtke
(218-720-5610) (ERL-Duluth).
Attachment 1: July 1994
Application Instructions for GLNPO Preproposals
September 30, 1994 Deadline
GLNPO requests submission of three-page preproposals for FY95
funding of projects pertaining to contaminated sediments, habitat
protection/restoration, pollution prevention, and state capacity.
Preproposals are also required from applicants seeking additional
funding under existing GLNPO grants. Following evaluations, full
proposals will be requested from selected applicants as early as
January, 1995. Please read carefully the project criteria and follow
the instructions below.
Eligibility
State pollution control agencies, interstate agencies, other public
or nonprofit private agencies, institutions, organizations, and
individuals are eligible for assistance. Assistance is available
pursuant to Clean Water Act §104(b)(3) for activities in the Great
Lakes Basin and in support of the US-Canada Great Lakes Water
Quality Agreement. Assistance may be for research, investigations,
experiments, training, demonstrations, surveys, and studies relating
to the causes, effects, extent, prevention, reduction, and
elimination of pollution.
Matching/Quality Assurance
The minimum non-Federal matching requirement for GLNPO
assistance is 5% of the entire project cost and may be provided in
cash or by in-kind contributions and other non-cash support. An
approved quality assurance plan will be required prior to the
commencement of any data collection and reporting activities.
Format for Preproposals
Preproposals are to be no more than three pages, excluding
the cover sheet. Attach a completed Preproposal Information Cover
Sheet to the front of the preproposal. If your agency submits more
than one preproposal, provide all preproposals together along with a
completed Multiple Preproposals - Summary Sheet, ranking the
preproposals in priority order. No other attachments are permitted
except letters of recommendation from applicable LAMP or RAP
committees and/or State agencies. Provide two copies of all
documentation and include the following components in the order
shown and under the headings that follow:
- Relevance to Great Lakes Priorities. Specifically state how
the proposed work supports Great Lakes priorities (see Section II
of the Great Lakes PFP), also keeping in mind the project criteria
in Attachment 2. Explain how the activity is within GLNPO
authority (see "eligibility" above.)
- Problem statement. Describe the issue that the project will
resolve or address and its relevance to the Great Lakes.
- Proposed work/Outcome. Outline what will be done, how, and
under what timetable. State what environmental result is expected,
referencing any affected pollutants, industry sectors, habitat,
and/or species as applicable. Identify deliverables and final
products.
- Education/Outreach Component. Describe the target audience and
how that group would be impacted by the project.
- Budget. Estimate the proposed GLNPO and applicant cost of the
work over the life of the project by summary categories for:
personnel, fringe benefits, travel, equipment, supplies,
contractual, and other.
- Other Funding. Provide a list of funds which are being pursued
or have been committed to your project by provider (include your
organization) and amount.
- Collaboration/Support. Describe plans and status of
collaboration amongst the public, private, and independent
sectors. Evidence of support will be required for full proposals.
Deadline
Send preproposals to:
USEPA
Great Lakes National Program Office (G-9J)
77 West Jackson Boulevard
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Preproposals must be received by September 30, 1994. Fax
transmissions will not be accepted.
Attachment
2:
GLNPO Request for Preproposals
States, Tribes, local governments, and other Great Lakes partners
are requested to submit three-page Preproposals for a total of $3.29
million* targeted for FY95 assistance. $490 thousand is reserved for
State Capacity assistance. The remainder is targeted for projects in
Contaminated Sediments ($1.5 million), Habitat
Protection/Restoration ($1 million), and Pollution Prevention ($300
thousand). Because the maximum flexibility GLNPO is afforded will be
used in selecting projects which are the highest priorities for the
Great Lakes ecosystem, the relative distribution of funding totals
for each of these categories may vary significantly from these
targets. Preproposals are also required from applicants seeking
additional funding under existing GLNPO grants. GLNPO seeks to fund
projects which (i) are not eligible for other Federal funding or
(ii) are leveraged with other funding sources. GLNPO staff are
available to assist in the development of Preproposals prior to
formal submission. Final decisions will be based upon complete
applications.
Contaminated Sediments. GLNPO will provide funding,
technical support, and vessel support to assist contaminated
sediment work in priority geographic areas in the Great Lakes.
GLNPO's ultimate objective is to assist in bringing about
remediation of contaminated sediments at these sites.
Projects could include:
- sediment assessments (chemical, physical, biological) to
better map contamination at a site.
- data collection to support mass balance modeling.
- data collection to support the development of risk/hazard
assessments.
- bench/pilot studies to support remedial efforts.
- other activities supporting sediment remediation.
GLNPO's preproposal evaluation will consider:
- support from the local RAP committee.
- availability of other funds to support the work.
- likelihood that remedial measures, including enforcement, will
result.
Contact: Marc
Tuchman (312-353-1369)
Habitat Protection/Restoration. GLNPO will assist its
partners in the development of a Great Lakes habitat restoration and
protection program which will demonstrate practices and tools for
protecting and restoring aquatic, terrestrial, and wetland habitats.
Partners should consult the 1994 report prepared by The Nature
Conservancy (TNC) and funded in part by USEPA, The Conservation of
Biological Diversity in the Great Lakes: Issues and Opportunities,
when developing proposals for habitat projects.
Funded work could include:
- revegetating beach dunes with native plant communities.
- stimulating growth, marketing, and distribution of a wider
variety of local plant genotypes.
- restoring wetland hydrology on previously converted wetlands.
- re-establishing spawning habitat for native fish species such
as lake trout, walleye pike, and lake sturgeon.
GLNPO's preproposal evaluation will consider the general concepts
expressed in TNC's report and:
- whether the project is located in an area supporting
significant biodiversity.
- whether the project has biological importance on a regional or
global scale.
- whether the project could lead to new ways of integrating
economic growth with conservation.
- capability of replicating success and fostering similar
actions elsewhere, creating new partnerships and testing new
techniques or approaches.
- opportunity to test new biological management practices and
new restoration techniques (e.g., species reintroduction,
rebuilding habitat, and developing biological corridors).
- appeal to a variety of funding sources (i.e., creating, rather
than depleting, funding sources).
- potential for identifying and reporting demonstrated measures
of success.
- incorporation of an education/outreach component.
- Final appropriation by Congress, among other reasons, may
change this FY95 planning target.
Contact: Karen
Holland (312-353-2690.
Pollution Prevention. GLNPO will provide assistance to
continue developing pollution prevention projects reducing the
amount of toxics and persistent bioaccumulating substances that are
discharged into the Great Lakes Basin. A successful project would
include integration of pollution prevention into day-to-day
decisions affecting the environment. Projects should support EPA's
National Pollution Prevention Strategy and the Great Lakes Pollution
Prevention Action Plan.
Projects might include:
- "model community" demonstration of pollution prevention
(alternatively, a first year activity could be development of a
model community pollution prevention plan).
- an initiative targeting a business sector discharging
significant amount of persistent, bioaccumulative substances into
the Great Lakes Basin.
- a demonstration of sustainable agricultural and/or
"whole-farm" planning practices which reduce the reliance on and
risk from pesticides, including the use of natural predators
rather than pesticides.
- a demonstration of how economic incentives or other voluntary
actions can induce companies to "virtually eliminate" usage of
PCBs and mercury.
GLNPO's preproposal evaluation will consider:
- furtherance of environmental goals in Lakewide Management
Plans and Areas of Concern, especially the reduction of toxics and
persistent bioaccumulating chemicals in the Great Lakes Basin.
- transferability across the Great Lakes Basin.
- potential to advance government and private partnerships.
- if for Lake Superior, furtherance of the goals of the
Bi-National Program.
- ability to define measures of success and quantify pollution
prevented.
- potential to further virtual elimination of targeted chemical
in the Great Lakes Basin.
Contact: Danielle
Green (312-886-7594)
State Capacity (Target: $490,000) Following approval of full
proposals, GLNPO expects to fund Ohio and the 6 States with
existing State Capacity grants through FY95 to develop and maintain
a "core capability" to manage and coordinate Great
Lakes multi-media program activities internal and external to their
Agencies. Pennsylvania may seek State Capacity funding,
if desired, by submitting a full grant application.
Up to $70,000 per State will continue to be targeted for "core
capability" assistance. Activities may include:
- integrating across State programs, including natural
resource management activities and agricultural programs, to
better target Great Lakes protection activities;
- improving the coordination and management of LAMP and RAP
processes, including tracking status, implementation, budgets,
data, etc.;
- assisting in establishing Great Lakes priorities and in
developing State consensus on Great Lakes policy issues;
- serving as a focal point for developing multi-media plans
which reflect State commitments in support of the Five Year
Strategy;
- serving as the overall point contact for a "cluster" of
GLNPO funded projects; and
- supporting travel for State personnel attending Great
Lakes meetings on sediment, monitoring, habitat
protection/restoration, or any of the above activities.
Proposals should demonstrate how the State plans to carry out
the above activities, and should also demonstrate how these
funds will complement and coordinate with Federally funded LAMP
and RAP positions. One requirement for receiving a grant in
this area is identification of a lead Great Lakes coordinator.
Factors which will be taken into consideration in determining
award amounts include: number of Great Lakes on which a State
borders; number of Areas of Concern; participation in Binational
activities; and linear miles of shoreline.
Contact: Michael Russ (312-886-4013)
Attachment 3: July 1994
PREPROPOSAL INFORMATION COVER SHEET
For GLNPO use only
GLNPO ID #_____________________________
Project Officer________________________
PROJECT INFORMATION
Title of Proposed Project__________________________________
________________________________________________________________
Category (Check only one)
____ Contaminated Sediments
____ Habitat Protection/Restoration
____ Pollution Prevention
____ State Capacity
Total GLNPO funding request: $________________
Year 1: ($____________) Year 2: ($____________)
GEOGRAPHIC/POLITICAL AREA AFFECTED (Check all applicable boxes)
|
Illinois |
Lake
Erie |
Lake
Huron |
Lake
Michigan |
|
Michigan |
|
Clinton River |
|
Saginaw River |
|
Manistique River |
|
New York |
|
Rouge River |
|
St. Marys River |
|
Menominee River |
|
Pennsylvania |
|
River Raisin |
|
St. Clair River |
|
Fox River/Green Bay |
|
Indiana |
|
Maumee River |
|
|
|
Sheboygan River |
|
Minnesota |
|
Black River |
Lake
Ontario |
|
Milwaukee Estuary |
|
Ohio |
|
Cuyahoga River |
|
Eighteenmile Creek |
|
Waukegan Harbor |
|
Wisconsin |
|
Ashtabula River |
|
Rochester Embayment |
|
Grand
Calumet/Indiana Harbor |
|
|
|
Buffalo River |
|
Oswego River |
|
Kalamazoo River |
Lake
Superior |
|
Detroit River |
|
St. Lawrence River |
|
Muskegon Lake |
|
St. Louis River |
|
Presque Isle Bay |
|
Niagara River |
|
White Lake |
|
Torch Lake |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deer Lake |
|
|
|
|
|
|
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Key Contact Person:_______________________________________
Applicant Name:___________________________________________
___________________________________________
Address:__________________________________________________
City/State/Zip Code:______________________________________
Telephone/Fax:____________________________________________
Fiscal Responsibility (if different)
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________
Attachment
4: July 1994
MULTIPLE PREPROPOSAL SUMMARY SHEET
Each organization (particularly each Environmental Agency or Department of Natural Resources having divisions,
sections, etc.) is requested to submit a single,
coordinated package of preproposals with this sheet.
APPLICANT INFORMATION
Overall Contact Person:____________________________________
Applicant Name:____________________________________________
Address:___________________________________________________
City/State/Zip Code:_______________________________________
Telephone/Fax:_____________________________________________
PROJECT RANKING
Rank Title of Proposed Project Category* Amount
1._______________________________________ ( ) $_________
_______________________________________
2._______________________________________ ( ) $_________
_______________________________________
3._______________________________________ ( ) $_________
_______________________________________
4._______________________________________ ( ) $_________
_______________________________________
5._______________________________________ ( ) $_________
_______________________________________
6._______________________________________ ( ) $_________
_______________________________________
7._______________________________________ ( ) $_________
_______________________________________
8._______________________________________ ( ) $_________
_______________________________________
9._______________________________________ ( ) $_________
_______________________________________
10.______________________________________ ( ) $_________
_______________________________________
Total GLNPO funding request: $_________
Continue on additional page, if necessary.
Please use the following abbreviations in identifying project
categories:
CS Contaminated Sediments
HB Habitat Protection/Restoration
P2 Pollution Prevention
SC State Capacity
- To save applicants from needlessly preparing full project
proposals, GLNPO requests and reviews project summaries or "preproposals."
If applicants instead choose to submit a full Proposal, GLNPO will
attempt to expedite its evaluation and decision process.
- Final appropriation by Congress, among other reasons, may change
this FY95 planning target.
- Resources may be available from a number of USEPA programs (GLNPO,
Pesticides/Toxic Substances, RCRA, and Water) to support
agricultural and urban clean sweeps in 1995. In Region 5, initial
points of contact for agricultural and urban clean sweeps are
Margaret Jones (Environmental Sciences Division; 312-353-5790) and
Donna Twickler (RCRA; 312-886-6184), respectively.
- See immediately preceding footnote.
|