Office of Administrative Law Judges Seven Parkway Center - Room
290 Pittsburgh, PA 15220
(412) 644-5754 (412) 644-5005 (FAX)
DATE: OCTOBER 5, 2000
CASE NO.: 2000-ERA 11
In the Matter of:
SYED M. A. HASAN
Complainant
v.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
Respondent
RECOMMENDED DECISION AND ORDER DISMISSING CLAIM
Procedural and Factual Background
The above-captioned case has not yet been scheduled for hearing. Respondent's
counsel submitted a Motion To Dismiss on January 31, 2000. Respondent alleges that Complainant
has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Complainant was ordered by this Court
to show cause why his complaint should not be dismissed on July 25, 2000. On August 7, 2000
Complainant submitted his Response to Show Cause Order. Complainant failed to submit evidence
to this Court which alleged any set of facts upon which relief could be granted.
1 Complainant filed safety concerns
against a contractor providing services to Commonwealth Edison.
2Interestingly, the cover letters are addressed
to the CEO and also to the President of the Nuclear Generation Group of Respondent. While not dispositive on the issue,
most employment solicitations indicate a specific department to which employment applications should be sent; and this
is rarely (if ever) the chief officers of a large company.