Davis Carter Scott (core and shell); Metropolitan Architects & Planners (tenant fit out)
Developer Contractor:
Crescent Resources
James G. Davis Construction Company
Sq. Ft.:
654,000 sq. ft.
Completed:
June 2006
Cost:
Sustainable Site
Best management practices was followed through use of a silt fence, stabilized construction entrance, sediment basin and other measures
Urban redevelopment site through a development density for the project and surrounding areas is 86,089.05 s.f. per acre.
Brownfield site which contained soil contaminated by cinder balast, arsenic, and benzo (A) pyrene. This was remediated prior to construction.
Public transportation access is provided by 2 bus lines within 1/4 mile of the project site. The site is also served by two rail lines just beyond the 1/2 mile radius from the project site.
Bicycle storage and shower facilities for 7% of the full-time equivalent building occupants.
14 Refueling Stations are provided to accommodate the required 3% of the total on-site parking
Parking capacity does not exceed minimum code requirements and provides preferred parking for carpools at 5% of occupants
Open space is preserved by 50% of the site area that does not fall within the building footprint. The area has been restored with native planting.
Storm water treatment is achieve in 82% total suspended solids and 63% total phosphate removal based on estimated loading from a 2-year / 24-hour storm event.
Heat islands in non-roof surfaces were avoided in 100% of the on-site parking stalls being located underground.
83.4% of roof meets emissivity requirements and complies with Energy Star to reduce heat island effect and 4.7 % is vegetative roof.
Water Efficiency
No permanent irrigation system has been installed and native/drought-tolerant planting were installed on the site
Over 41.56% water use reduction through use through the installation of dual flush water closets, ultra low flush urinals, low flow showerheads, and ultra-low flow lavatory faucets
Energy & Atmosphere
Optimized energy efficiency through a 20.7 % energy reduction compared to Amercian Society of Heating and Refrigeration Engineers (ASHRAE) 90.1-1999 using the LEED engineering and construction bulletin method
Additional commissioning implemented for the project.
Hydroflurocarbon and Halon free HVAC (heating ventilation and air conditioning) equipment
Green power purchased to meet 68% of the building electrical needs for over of 2 years
Materials & Resources
Occupant recycling
Diverted 71.62% of construction waste through effective waste management plan
27.36% of total building materials by value contain recycled materials
62.8% local and regional materials manufactured regionally
82.79% of wood based building products are harvested from Forest Stewardship Council certified sources Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ)
CO2 sensors monitor to outside ambient levels and increased ventilation if exceeding thresholds
Construction Indoor Air Quality (IAQ) Management plan was in compliance with Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors' National Association guidelines, during construction, MERV 8 filters were installed at grilles
Construction IAQ Management plan before occupancy – the project conforms with the required IAQ testing protocol
Low emitting adhesive and sealants were used
Low emitting paints were used
Low emitting carpet was used
Low emitting composite wood was used
Indoor pollutant source control
Designed for thermal comfort compliance with ASHRAE 55 – 1992 for relative humidity and temperature
Thermal comfort monitoring system installed for compliance with ASHRAE 55 – 1992 for relative humidity and temperature
Daylight and views for 90% of all regularly occupied spaces
Innovation and Design
Exemplary performance in local materials- achieved 62.8% of the total materials by cost were manufactured within 500 miles
Green house keeping program
Educational program
Exemplary performance in 41.56 % water savings
LEED accredited professionals participating on the project