[Federal Register: November 15, 2002 (Volume 67, Number 221)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Page 69181-69182]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr15no02-26]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
50 CFR Part 648
[Docket No. 021101264-2264-01; I.D. 101802D]
RIN 0648-AQ33
Fisheries of the Northeastern United States; Atlantic Herring
Fishery
AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.
ACTION: Proposed 2003 specifications for the Atlantic herring fishery;
request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: NMFS proposes specifications for the 2003 Atlantic herring
fishery. The regulations for the Atlantic herring fishery require NMFS
to publish specifications for the upcoming year and to provide an
opportunity for public comment. The intent of the specifications is to
conserve and manage the Atlantic herring resource and provide for a
sustainable fishery.
DATES: Comments must be received no later than 5 p.m., Eastern Standard
Time, on December 16, 2002.
ADDRESSES: Copies of supporting documents, including the Environmental
Assessment, Regulatory Impact Review, Initial Regulatory Flexibility
Analysis (EA/RIR/IRFA), Essential Fish Habitat Assessment, and the
Stock Assessment and Fishery Evaluation (SAFE) Report for the 2001
Atlantic Herring Fishing Year are available from Paul J. Howard,
Executive Director, New England Fishery Management Council, 50 Water
Street, Mill 2, Newburyport, MA 01950. The EA/RIR/IRFA is accessible
via the Internet at http://www.nero.nmfs.gov/ro/doc/nero.html.
Written comments on the proposed specifications should be sent to
Patricia A. Kurkul, Regional Administrator, National Marine Fisheries
Service, 1 Blackburn Drive, Gloucester, MA 01930. Mark on the outside
of the envelope: ``Comments--2003 Herring Specifications.'' Comments
may also be sent via facsimile (fax) to (978) 281-9371. Comments will
not be accepted if submitted via e-mail or the Internet.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paul H. Jones, Fishery Policy Analyst,
(978) 281-9273, e-mail at paul.h.jones@noaa.gov, fax at (978) 281-9135.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulations implementing the Atlantic
Herring Fishery Management Plan (FMP) require the New England Fishery
Management Council's (Council) Atlantic Herring Plan Development Team
(PDT) to meet at least annually, no later than July each year, with the
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission's (Commission) Atlantic
Herring Plan Review Team (PRT) to develop and recommend the following
specifications for consideration by the Council's Atlantic Herring
Oversight Committee: Allowable biological catch (ABC), optimum yield
(OY), domestic annual harvest (DAH), domestic annual processing (DAP),
total foreign processing (JVPt), joint venture processing (JVP),
internal waters processing (IWP), U.S. at-sea processing (USAP), border
transfer (BT), total allowable level of foreign fishing (TALFF), and
reserve (if any). The PDT and PRT also recommend the total allowable
catch (TAC) for each management area and subarea identified in the FMP.
As the basis for its recommendations, the PDT reviews available data
pertaining to: Commercial and recreational catch; current estimates of
fishing mortality; stock status; recent estimates of recruitment;
virtual population analysis results and other estimates of stock size;
sea sampling and trawl survey data or, if sea sampling data are
unavailable, length frequency information from trawl surveys; impact of
other fisheries on herring mortality; and any other relevant
information. Recommended specifications are presented to the Council
for adoption and recommendation to NMFS.
Proposed 2003 Specifications
At its August 2002 meeting, the Council recommended specifications
for the 2003 Atlantic herring fishery. Based on the Council's
recommendations, NMFS proposes the specifications and Area TACs
contained in the following table.
Specifications and Area TACs for the 2003 Atlantic Herring Fishery
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specification Proposed Allocation (mt)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
ABC 300,000
OY 250,000
DAH 250,000
DAP 226,000
JVPt 20,000
JVP 10,000
(Area 2 and 3 only)
IWP 10,000
USAP 20,000
(Area 2 and 3 only)
BT 4,000
TALFF 0
Reserve 0
[[Page 69182]]
TAC-Area 1A 60,000
TAC-Area 1B 10,000
TAC-Area 2 50,000
(TAC reserve: 70,000)
TAC-Area 3 60,000
------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are two proposed changes from the specifications approved by
NMFS for the 2002 fishery: A transfer of 10,000 mt from the Area 2 TAC
reserve to the Area 3, TAC resulting in an Area 3 TAC of 60,000 mt and
an Area 2 TAC reserve of 70,000 mt; and a restriction on USAP vessels
to receive fish from Areas 2 and 3 only. A discussion of impacts of
these proposed changes follows.
Increase to the Area 3 TAC
The proposed increase in the Area 3 TAC from 50,000 to 60,000 mt,
and concomitant decrease in the Area 2 TAC reserve from 80,000 to
70,000 mt will have no significant impact on the Atlantic herring stock
or the Southern New England/Georges Bank Atlantic herring spawning
component. Landings from Area 3 totaled 34,510 mt in 2001, a large
increase over the 12,884 mt landed from Area 3 in 2000. This would
suggest that the Area 3 TAC could be fully harvested in the future,
especially if shoreside processors are able to expand markets and
processing capacity. Harvest from Area 2 totaled 15,388 mt in 2001,
well below the 50,000-mt TAC and 80,000-mt TAC reserve for that area.
Therefore, the proposed TAC-reserve reduction to 70,000 mt in Area 2 is
not expected to have any impact on the fishery.
USAP
No biological impacts on the stock of Atlantic herring are
anticipated as a result of restricting USAP vessels to receiving fish
from Areas 2 and 3 only. No vessel has fished under the USAP category
since the FMP was implemented. However, if a USAP vessel has the
opportunity to operate in or near Area 1 at a lower cost (for fuel,
maintenance, or other operational expenses) than it would incur from
fishing in Areas 2 or 3, and it is restricted from fishing in Area 1,
the profitability of the USAP vessel could be compromised. However, the
prohibition on harvesting Area 1 fish for delivery to USAP vessels
would leave more fish available to shoreside processors and bait
dealers operating on the coasts of Maine, New Hampshire, and
Massachusetts, the three states that border Area 1A (the inshore
portion of Area 1). The quota for Area 1A was taken prior to the end of
both the 2000 and 2001 fishing years.
Classification
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant under
Executive Order 12866.
The Council and NOAA Fisheries prepared an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis (IRFA) as required by section 603 of the
Regulatory Flexibility Act. The IRFA describes the economic impact that
this proposed rule, if adopted, would have on small entities. A summary
of the analysis follows:
A description of the reasons why this action is being considered,
and the objectives of this proposed rule can be found in the preamble
to this proposed rule and are not repeated here. This action does not
contain any collection-of-information, reporting, or recordkeeping
requirements. It would not duplicate, overlap, or conflict with any
other Federal rules.
All of the affected businesses (fishing vessels and dealers) are
considered small entities under the standards described in NOAA
Fisheries guidelines because they have annual returns (revenues) that
do not exceed $3.5 million annually. The last full year of data
available for the Atlantic herring fishery is for 2001. There were 146
vessels, 6 processors, and 190 dealers participating in the fishery in
2001. Given that vessels caught less than half the OY in 2001, the
proposed status quo OY should not impact harvest levels in 2003.
The Council, in proposing an increase in the Area 3 TAC from 50,000
to 60,000 mt, and concomitant decrease in the Area 2 TAC reserve from
80,000 to 70,000 mt, considered only a zero-sum transfer that would not
alter the proposed OY of 250,000 mt. Landings from Area 3 increased
from 12,884 mt in 2000 to 34,150 mt in 2001. The Council sought to
provide additional opportunity for the industry to increase its
activity in Area 3. The Council did not consider transferring any TAC
from Area 1 because that is the area in which the fishery has
historically concentrated its activity. In fact in 2001, landings from
Area 1A and Area 1B totaled 68,130 mt, nearly attaining the combined
TAC for both areas of 70,000 mt. Landings from Area 2 in 2001 were
15,388 mt out of a combined Area 2 TAC and Area 2 TAC Reserve of
130,000 mt. Thus the Council concluded that the transfer of 10,000 mt
from the Reserve would still leave a substantial amount of TAC for the
fishery to expand its activity in Area 2. If the transfer is fully
utilized, an additional 10,000 mt would produce additional revenues of
1.2M (assuming $120/mt) to vessels and a proportionate increase in
profits to processors.
As noted above, landings from Area 1 in 2001 neared the total TAC
for the area. The Council was concerned that future USAP activity, if
allowed in Area 1, would have negative impact on firms that have
historically harvested Area 1 fish for sale to shoreside processors. If
the Area 1 TACs were attained, harvesting vessels that sell their catch
to shoreside processors would have to fish further offshore, increasing
their operating costs and potentially reducing their profitability. The
economic impact on USAP vessels from prohibition on receiving fish
harvested in Areas 1A and 1B cannot be directly measured since there is
no history of over-the-side purchases upon which to base economic
impacts.
The Council considered a Committee recommendation to reduce USAP by
5,000 mt, but rejected it based on comments that a vessel may operate
under this specification in 2003 and be able to utilize 20,000 mt. The
specification of 15,000 mt would reduce potential profits of USAP
operations when compared to the status quo specification of 20,000 mt,
although as yet, no part of USAP has been utilized. The Council did not
consider a recommendation to increase USAP by 5,000 mt, because no
vessel has fished under the USAP category since the FMP was
implemented.
Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.
Dated: November 12, 2002.
Rebecca Lent,
Deputy Assistant Administrator for Regulatory Programs, National Marine
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 02-29181 Filed 11-14-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-S