skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 9, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > USDOL/OALJ Reporter
DOL Home USDOL/OALJ Reporter

A.D. ROE, INC., Contractor, WAB No. 84-11 (WAB Dec. 18, 1985)


CCASE: A.D. ROE, INC. DDATE: 19851218 TTEXT: ~1 [1] WAGE APPEALS BOARD UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR WASHINGTON, D. C. In the Matter of A.D. ROE, INC., Contractor WAB Case No. 84-11 & John P. Fox, d/b/a Fox Painting and Decorating Company Dated: December 18, 1985 Tactical Equipment Shops & Facilities, Ft. Knox, KY, DACA 31-78-C-0091 etc. APPEARANCES: C. Wayne Shepherd, Esquire for John P. Fox & Fox Painting and Decorating Company Patricia M. Duryee, Esquire, Douglas Davidson, Esquire for the Assistant Administrator, Wage and Hour Division, U.S. Department of Labor BEFORE: Alvin Bramow, Chairman, Thomas X. Dunn, Member Stuart Rothman, Member DECISION OF THE WAGE APPEALS BOARD This case is before the Wage Appeals Board on the petition of John P. Fox d/b/a Fox Painting and Decorating Company seeking review of the Administrative Law Judge's decision of April 11, 1984. See attachment. The Administrative Law Judge found that the petitioner failed to pay its employees applicable prevailing wages, proper [1] ~2 [2] overtime, and falsified its certified payroll records. Consequently, the Administrative Law Judge ordered that John P. Fox and Fox Painting and Decorating, Inc., /FN1/ are liable in the amount of $11,950.46 for unpaid wages and that John P. Fox and Fox Painting and Decorating, Inc., be debarred for a period of three years for violations of the Davis-Bacon Act, as amended, (40 U.S.C. 276a, et seq.), the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 (42 U.S.C. 5310, 1440(g)), the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 1372), the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 327, et seq.), and the Department of Labor Regulations, 29 CFR Part 5. The Board considered this appeal on the basis of the Petition for Review and brief on behalf of the petitioner, the statement on behalf of the Assistant Administrator filed by the Solicitor of Labor, the record of the case before the Administrative Law Judge and his Decision and Order, and a hearing before this Board held December 10, 1985, at which interested persons participated. There is sufficient evidence in the record to support the Administrative Law Judge's findings of fact and conclusions of Law, Therefore, the Board finds that the Administrative [2] ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ /FN1/ The Administrative Law Judge erroneously found and ordered Fox Painting and Decorating, Inc., liable in the amount of $11,950.46 for unpaid wages. The corporation was newly formed after the violations and contracts completed. ~3 [3] Law Judge's Order is not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion or unsupported by substantial evidence. In view of these facts, the Decision and Order are adopted in their entirety as the Decision of the Wage Appeals Board. /FN2/ Accordingly, the Decision and Order of the Administrative Law Judge is affirmed and the petition herein is dismissed. BY ORDER OF THE BOARD Craig Bulger, Executive Secretary Wage Appeals Board [3] ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ /FN2/ The Administrative Law Judge was correct in ordering debarment of the corporation, Fox Painting and Decorating, Inc. The Davis-Bacon Act and Department of Labor Regulations (29 CFR 5.12(a)(1) and (2)) provide for such debarment action. The record is clear that John P. Fox has an interest and actually runs the corporation's painting business. [3]



Phone Numbers