Attorneys for the United States

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA                      v. UENO FINE CHEMICALS INDUSTRY, LTD.                           Defendant.

| | | | | | | | | | |

No. CR 01 - 0018VRW INFORMATION VIOLATION: Title 15, United States Code, Section 1 (Price Fixing, Volume Allocation) San Francisco Venue Filed: January 23, 2001

The United States of America, acting through its attorneys, charges:

1. UENO FINE CHEMICALS INDUSTRY, LTD. ("UENO") is made a defendant on the charge stated below.

2. From in or about January 1979 until in or about April 1996, defendant UENO and its coconspirators, entered into and engaged in a combination and conspiracy to suppress and eliminate competition by fixing the prices and allocating the volumes of sorbates to be sold in the United States and elsewhere. The combination and conspiracy engaged in by the defendant and its coconspirators was in unreasonable restraint of interstate and foreign trade and commerce in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act (15 U.S.C. § 1).

3. The charged combination and conspiracy consisted of a continuing agreement, understanding, and concert of action among the defendant and its coconspirators, the substantial terms of which were:

1. to agree to fix and maintain prices and to coordinate price increases for sorbates to be sold in the United States and elsewhere; and

2. to agree to allocate among major sorbates producers the volumes of sorbates to be sold in the United States and elsewhere.

4. For the purpose of forming and carrying out the charged combination and conspiracy, the defendant and its coconspirators did those things that they combined and conspired to do, including, among other things:

1. participating in meetings and conversations to discuss the prices and volumes of sorbates to be sold in the United States and elsewhere;

2. agreeing, during those meetings and conversations, to charge prices at certain levels and otherwise to increase and maintain prices of sorbates to be sold in the United States and elsewhere;

3. agreeing, during those meetings and conversations, to allocate among major producers of sorbates the volumes of sorbates to be sold in the United States and elsewhere;

4. issuing price announcements and price quotations in accordance with the agreements reached; and

5. exchanging information on sales of sorbates in the United States and elsewhere, for the purpose of monitoring and enforcing adherence to the agreed-upon prices and sales volumes.

5. UENO is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of Japan. During the period covered by this Information, UENO was engaged in the business of producing and, through UENO's trading company and its U.S. subsidiary, selling sorbates for resale to customers in the United States and elsewhere.

6. Various corporations and individuals, not made defendants in this Information, participated as coconspirators in the offense charged in this Information and performed acts and made statements in furtherance of it.

7. Whenever in this Information reference is made to any act, deed, or transaction of any corporation, the allegation means that the corporation engaged in the act, deed, or transaction by or through its officers, directors, employees, agents, or other representatives while they were actively engaged in the management, direction, control, or transaction of its business or affairs.

8. Sorbates are chemical preservatives used primarily as mold inhibitors in high-moisture and high-sugar food products. All references to sorbates in this Information include the products potassium sorbate and sorbic acid.

9. During the period covered by this Information, the defendant and its coconspirators sold and distributed sorbates in a continuous and uninterrupted flow of interstate and foreign trade and commerce to customers located in states or countries other than the states or countries in which the defendant and its coconspirators produced sorbates.

10. The business activities of the defendant and its coconspirators that are the subject of this Information were within the flow of, and substantially affected, interstate and foreign trade and commerce.

11. The combination and conspiracy charged in this Information was carried out, in part, in the Northern District of California, within the five years preceding the filing of this Information.

ALL IN VIOLATION OF TITLE 15, UNITED STATES CODE, SECTION 1.

_______________/s/________________ A. Douglas Melamed Acting Assistant Attorney General _______________/s/________________ James M. Griffin Deputy Assistant Attorney General _______________/s/________________ Scott D. Hammond Director of Criminal Enforcement United States Department of Justice Antitrust Division _______________/s/________________ Robert S. Mueller, III United States Attorney Northern District of California

_______________/s/________________ Christopher S Crook Chief, San Francisco Office _______________/s/________________ Marc Siegel Michael L. Scott Stuart J. Seaborn Attorneys U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division 450 Golden Gate Ave. Box 36046, Room 10-0101 San Francisco, CA 94102 (415) 436-6660