This document is available in two formats: this web page (for browsing content) and PDF (comparable to original document formatting). To view the PDF you will need Acrobat Reader, which may be downloaded from the Adobe site. For an official signed copy, please contact the Antitrust Documents Group.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                           Plaintiff,

                  v.

AMR CORPORATION,
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., and      
AMR EAGLE HOLDING
CORPORATION,

                           Defendants.

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|         
Civil Action No.:99 -1180-JTM

APPENDIX OF UNREPORTED DECISIONS
IN SUPPORT OF THE UNITED STATES' MOTION IN LIMINE
TO EXCLUDE EVIDENCE RELATED TO A MEETING COMPETITION DEFENSE

Plaintiff submits true and correct copies of the following unreported decisions and other authority cited in its Memorandum in Support of a Motion In Limine to Exclude Evidence Related to a Meeting Competition Defense:

  1. 3 Von Kalinowski, et al., Antitrust Laws and Trade Regulation ¶ 40.02[1] (2d ed. 1999);

  2. 3 Phillip E. Areeda & Herbert Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law ¶ 748 (rev. ed. 1996);

  3. 14 Herbert Hovenkamp, Antitrust Law ¶ 2352a (1999);

  4. Section of Antitrust Law, American Bar Ass'n, Predatory Pricing Law: A Circuit-by-Circuit Survey 118 (1995).

Dated: April 2, 2001

Respectfully submitted

COUNSEL FOR
PLAINTIFF UNITED STATES

_______________/"s"/________________
ByMark J. Niefer
Department of Justice, Antitrust Division
601 D Street, N.W. Suite 1200
Washington, D.C. 20530
Tel: (202) 307-6318
Fax: (202) 307-2784