skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 9, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
DOL Home USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Torres v. Transcon Freight Lines, 90-STA-29 (Sec'y Jan. 30, 1991)


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
DEPUTY SECRETARY OF LABOR
WASHINGTON, D.C.
20210

DATE: January 30, 1991
CASE NO. 90-STA-29

IN THE MATTER OF

KARL L. TORRES,
   COMPLAINANT

v.

TRANSCON FREIGHT LINES,
   RESPONDENT.

BEFORE:   THE ACTING SECRETARY OF LABOR1

DECISION AND ORDER STAYING PROCEEDING
AND REMANDING CASE

   Before me for review is the [Recommended] Order of Dismissal issued by Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) A.A. Simpson, Jr., on December 11, 1990, in this case which arises under the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982 (STAA), 49 U.S.C. app. § 2305 (1988). The ALJ dismissed Complainant Torres' complaint against Respondent Transcon Freight Lines because, subsequent to the filing of Torres' complaint, Transcon was put into involuntary bankruptcy. The basis of the ALJ's dismissal was his conclusion that the automatic stay provision of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1) (1988), applies to this proceeding. For the reasons set forth below, I agree with the ALJ that further action on Torres' complaint must be stayed, but I do not agree that dismissal of that complaint is appropriate at this time.

   The Bankruptcy Act provides that the filing of a petition for bankruptcy operates to stay the commencement or continuation of any administrative proceeding against the debtor that was or could have been commenced prior to the bankruptcy case. 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1). Complainant Torres' complaint, alleging that Respondent Transcon suspended and warned him in violation of the STAA, was filed in January 1990, and was before the ALJ for hearing when Transcon was forced into involuntary bankruptcy in May of 1990. Application of Section 362(a)(1), therefore, would compel that further action on Torres' complaint be stayed.


[Page 2]

   Subsection (b)(4) of Section 362, however, exempts from the automatic stay provision "the commencement or continuation of an action or proceeding by a governmental unit2 to enforce such governmental unit's, police or regulatory power." In Nelson v Walker Freight Line. Inc., Case No. 87-STA-24, Sec. Dec. and Order, July 26, 1988, it was held that actions undertaken to enforce the STAA fall within the exception of Section 362(b)(4) because they "are an exercise of our national safety policy" by a governmental unit. Helson slip op. at 6. In finding that the Nelson case was a proceeding by a governmental unit, the Secretary stated:

Although Section 2305 actions, unlike NLRA and Title VII discrimination suits, do not require the filing of a complaint by a Federal administrative unit, they nevertheless can be considered "proceedings by a governmental unit" within the meaning of the automatic stay exemption. The regulations implementing Section 2305 specifically provide that the prosecuting party shall be the Assistant Secretary for Occupational Safety and Health in any case in which either the employer alone or both the employer and the Complainant object to the Secretary's preliminary findings. 29 C.F.R. § 1978.107(a) and (c). In the case before me, Respondent objected to the Secretary's Finding's and Preliminary Order of June 2, 1987, which found that Respondent's discharge of Complainant was in violation of Section 2305 of the STAA, and the case was prosecuted by the Associate Regional Solicitor on behalf of the United States Department of Labor as well as the Complainant. Transcript of Hearing, August 21, 1987, at 4; Transcript of Hearing, March 3, 1988, at 4. I, therefore, find that the case before me falls within the exemption of section 362(b)(4) of the Bankruptcy Code.3

Here, however, the Assistant Secretary is not involved in the prosecution of Torres' complaint. The record reveals that, after investigation of Torres' complaint, the Regional Administrator, acting for the Assistant Secretary, issued findings that the complaint had no merit and dismissed the complaint subject to Complainant's right to file objections and request a hearing. Complainant exercised his right to pursue his claim by requesting a hearing. See 29 C.F.R. § 1978.105 (1990). The question before me, therefore, is whether the exception for governmental units is inapplicable because the Assistant Secretary decided the complaint had no merit and was absent from this proceeding.

   As noted in Nelson, Congress recognized that Section 2305 of the STAA "was considered necessary to encourage whistleblowing employees" in order to ensure enforcement of commercial vehicle safety laws and regulations. Nelson, slip op. at 6. Enforcement of the Federal government's police or regulatory power, however, is not enough to convert what is essentially a private proceeding to a "proceeding by a governmental unit." Thus, in In re Revere Copper andBrass. Inc., Hudson River Sloop Clearwater. Inc. v. Revere Copper Products. Inc., 32 Bankr. 725 (S.D.N.Y. 1983), it was held that corporations pursuing a citizen's suit under the Clean Water Act were not "governmental units" notwithstanding the fact that they may have been acting as "private attorney generals seeking to enforce the environmental laws." 32 Bankr. at 727. The court concluded that "[c]learly, both the


[Page 3]

statutory language and the legislative history [of Section 362(b)(4)] demonstrate that the term 'governmental unit' in the bankruptcy code refers exclusively to actual governmental groups and not to organizations acting in a governmental capacity." Id. See also In Re Colin, Hochstin Co., 41 Bankr. 322 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 1984), holding that the New York Stock Exchange and its enforcement division are not governmental units exempt from the automatic stay provision even though they act in the national public interest to protect investors and the general public in the securities market.

   Accordingly, I find that, because of the determination of the Assistant Secretary that Torres' complaint is without merit and because of the ensuing absence of the Assistant Secretary either as the prosecuting party or as an intervener, continuation of the proceeding on Torres' STAA complaint must be stayed pursuant to Section 362(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Act.

   It does not follow from the stay of Torres' STAA proceeding, however, that Torres' complaint is to be automatically dismissed. The stay remains in effect only until a final disposition of the bankruptcy case, see 11 U.S.C. § 362(c), which may or may not result in the discharge of Transcon from all of its debts. The fact that the bankruptcy proceeding is a Chapter 7 liquidation proceeding and there has been appointed a Trustee, whose duties include the liquidation and the expeditious closing of the bankruptcy estate, see 11 U.S.C. § 204(1), presupposes that the bankruptcy court will discharge Transcon from all of its debts on liquidation of its assets. There is, however, nothing in the record to indicate that this has occurred. Until the bankruptcy court orders the discharge of Transcon from all its debts, Complainant Torres has a viable (albeit stayed) claim.

   Accordingly, this case is remanded to the ALJ, and further action on Torres' STAA complaint is stayed pending disposition of the bankruptcy proceeding. The Trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Transcon is requested to advise the ALJ within fifteen days of receipt of this order as to the current status of Transcon's bankruptcy case, and to submit to the AL] the final order of the bankruptcy court as soon as it becomes available. Thereupon the ALJ shall act promptly to conclude his review of this case,consistent with this order.

SO ORDERED.

         Acting Secretary of Labor

Washington, D.C.

[ENDNOTES]

1There is presently a vacancy in the Office of Secretary of Labor. The Deputy Secretary is authorized to "perform the duties of the Secretary until a successor is appointed. . . ." 29 U.S.C. § 552 (1988).

2The definition provision of the Bankruptcy Act provides that

"governmental unit" means United States; State; Commonwealth; District; Territory; municipality; foreign state; department, agency, or instrumentality of the United States (but not a United States trustee while serving as a trustee in a case under this title), a State, a Commonwealth, a District, a Territory, a municipality, or a foreign state; or other foreign or domestic government;

11 U.S.C. § 101(26).

3It is only when Complainant objects to the preliminary finding that the complaint lacks merit that the Assistant Secretary is not the prosecuting party, although the Assistant Secretary retains the right to intervene as a party. 29 C.F.R. § 1978.107(b).

slip op. at 6-7.



Phone Numbers