skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 9, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
DOL Home USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Howe v. Domino's Pizza Distribution Corp., 89-STA-11 9Sec'y Jan. 25, 1990)


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

SECRETARY OF LABOR
WASHINGTON, D.C.

DATE: January 25, 1990
CASE NO. 89-STA-11

IN THE MATTER OF

DAVID E. HOWE,
   COMPLAINANT,

   v.

DOMINO'S PIZZA DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION,
   RESPONDENT.

BEFORE: THE SECRETARY OF LABOR

FINAL DECISION AND ORDER

    Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Thomas M. Burke submitted a Recommended Decision and Order (R.D. and O.) in this case which arises under the employee protection provision of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982, 49 U.S.C. app. § 2305 (1982). That decision, issued on October 6, 1989, recommends that the case be dismissed based upon the ALJ's conclusions that Complainant Howe was justifiably terminated for misconduct, i.e. "insubordination and abusive behavior," R.D. and O. at 8, and that the reasons advanced by Respondent for its action were supported by the record and were not pretextual. He held that Complainant's termination was not in retaliation for protected activity and that Complainant had failed to present a prima facie case. R.D. and O. at 9.

    The record in this case has been thoroughly reviewed. The record fully supports the ALJ's factual findings and under the applicable regulations, those findings are conclusive. 29 C.F.R. § 1978.109(c)(3) (1988). I also concur in the ALJ's conclusion that Complainant has failed to establish a prima facie case of retaliation by the Respondent based on protected activity. Accordingly, I adopt and append to this order the Recommended Decision and Order of October 6, 1989, and the complaint in this case IS DENIED. 29 C.F.R. § 1978.109(c)(4).

   SO ORDERED.

      Elizabeth Dole
      Secretary of Labor

Washington, D.C.



Phone Numbers