skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 9, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
DOL Home USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Hadley v. Southeast Cooperative Service Co., 86-STA-24 (Sec'y Apr. 6, 1988)


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

SECRETARY OF LABOR
WASHINGTON, D.C.

DATE: April 6, 1988
CASE NO. 86-STA-24

IN THE MATTER OF

MICHAEL HADLEY,
    COMPLAINANT,

    v.

SOUTHEAST COOPERATIVE SERVICE CO.,
    RESPONDENT.

   BEFORE: THE SECRETARY OF LABOR

ORDER OF REMAND

    On February 22, 1988, I issued an Order to Show Cause "why I should not treat the record before me as a request for withdrawal pursuant to Section 1978.111(c) of 29 C.F.R. and affirm the Secretary's Findings of June 27, 1986, finding that Respondent did not terminate Complainant in violation of section § 2305 of the STAA." Order to Show Cause at 2-3.

    By letter of March 14, 1988, Complainant responded to this order. It is clear from Complainant's letter that he did not intend to withdraw his objections to the Secretary's findings but rather was seeking a continuance of the hearing.

    Respondent has not responded to my Order to Show Cause, and the time for any response has expired.

    In view of Complainant's response, I do not adopt the order of Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Richard D. Mills dismissing this case "with prejudice." ALJ's Order of Dismissal, issued January 5, 1987. Accordingly, I remand this case to the ALJ for further proceedings, including the establishment of a hearing date convenient to both parties.

    Complainant has failed to serve upon Respondent a copy of Complainant's response of March 14, 1988. For the purpose of effectuating such service, a copy of Complainant's response is attached.

    SO ORDERED.

       ANN MCLAUGHLIN
       Secretary of Labor

Washington, D.C.


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Secretary of Labor
Washington, D.C. 20210

RE: Hadley vs. SE Cooperative
CASE NO. 86-STA-24

March 14, 1988

S i r :

    Reference the above mentioned case, I was under the impression that since I could not respond to the previous hearing date I would have to withdraw my complaint until a latter time.

    As my counsel has indicated I am in the U.S. ARMY stationed in the Republic of Panama and due to my heavy commitment in South Central America I was unable to attend the previous scheduled hearing.

    I would like to have noted that I taken leave for the December [illegible], 1987 hearing to find out that the respondent was on a ocean cruise and the case could not be heard.

    I respectfully ask for guidance, and hope to be afforded the opportunity to purse this matter.

       Sincerely yours,

       MICHAEL W. HADLEY



Phone Numbers