skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 9, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
DOL Home USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Hufstetler v. Roadway Express, Inc., 85-STA-8 (Sec'y Jan. 7, 1986)


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

SECRETARY OF LABOR
WASHINGTON, D.C.

Case No. 85-STA-8

In the Matter of

Jerry W. Hufstetler,
    Complainant

    v.

Roadway Express, Inc.,
    Respondent

Order of Remand

    Following issuance of his Recommended Decision and Order in the above-captioned case on October 30, 1985, Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) James W. Kerr, Jr., transmitted the record of the case to me for review. Examination of the transcript of the hearing reveals that approximately one hundred (100) exhibits were utilized during the hearing. The record transmitted to me, however, contains only twenty (20) exhibits. A list of these exhibits is attached. Moreover, it appears that only some of the twenty exhibits were made a part of the record of this case.

    The incomplete state of the record makes it impossible for me to review the ALJ's findings and conclusions. Accordingly, I remand the case to the ALJ in order that he complete the record by including therein all missing exhibits and by properly identifying all exhibits. Exhibits which were rejected or used solely for identification purposes should also be included in the record and should be identified as having been rejected or introduced only for purposes of identification. The record must be completed within thirty days of the issuance of this Order. Upon completion of the record, this case should promptly be transmitted to me for review.

    On November 19, 1985, Respondent in this case filed with me exceptions, with accompanying brief, to Judge Kerr's decision. on November 25, 1985, Complainant filed his objections to Judge's Kerr's decision. on December 17, 1985, Daniel J. Mick, Counsel for Regional Trial Litigation for the Regional Solicitor's Office of the U.S. Department of Labor, requested that I enter his appearance in this case and that, if I accept Respondent's exceptions and brief, I permit the Regional Solicitor's Office to file a responding brief. I have entered Mr. Mick's appearance in this case. Furthermore, I accept Respondent's


[Page 2]

exceptions and brief and Complainant's objections, and I grant the motion of Counsel for the Regional Solicitor to file a responding brief. Upon receipt of the completed record, I will promptly establish a schedule for briefing on Judge Kerr's Recommended Decision and Order of October 30, 1985 and his Proposed Order Granting In Part and Denying in Part Regional Administrator's Motion For Reconsideration, issued November 21, 1985.

       BILL BROCK
       Secretary of Labor

Dated: JAN 7 1986
Washington, D.C.



Phone Numbers