skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 9, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
DOL Home USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Coley v. Jim Lineberger Grading & Paving, 94-SWD-2 (Sec'y Jan. 26, 1995)


DATE:  January 26, 1995
CASE NO. 94-SWD-2


IN THE MATTER OF

CHARLES COLEY,

          CLAIMANT,

     v.

JIM LINEBERGER GRADING 
AND PAVING,

          EMPLOYER.


BEFORE:   THE SECRETARY OF LABOR


                     FINAL ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT

     Before me for review is the Recommended Decision and Order
Approving Settlement and Dismissing Complaint issued December 30,
1994, by the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in this case, under
the employee protection provision of the Solid Waste Disposal Act
(SWD). 42 U.S.C. § 6971 (1988).  The ALJ found the agreement
fair, adequate and reasonable, see Fuchko and Yunker v.
Georgia Power Co., Case Nos. 89-ERA-9, 89-ERA-10, Sec. Order,
Mar. 23, 1989, slip op. at 1-2.  The ALJ also found that the
Settlement Agreement satisfied the requirements regarding a
complainant's cooperation with government authorities set forth
in Polizzi v. Gibbs and Hill, Inc., 87-ERA-38, Sec. Order,
slip op. issued July 18, 1989, see Settlement Agreement, Section C(8), as
amended.  The ALJ recommended that the agreement be approved and
the case dismissed with prejudice.
     Review of the agreement reveals that it may encompass the
settlement of matters under laws other than the SWD. 
See 

[PAGE 2] Settlement Agreement, Section C(2). As stated in Poulos v. Ambassador Fuel Oil Co., Inc., Case No. 86-CAA-1, Sec. Order, Nov. 2, 1987, slip op. at 2: [The Secretary's] authority over settlement agreements is limited to such statutes as are within [the Secretary's] jurisdiction and is defined by the applicable statute. See Aurich v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Case No. [86-]CAA-2, Secretary's Order Approving Settlement, issued July 29, 1987; Chase v. Buncombe County, N.C., Case No. 85-SWD-4, Secretary's Order on Remand, issued November 3, 1986. I have therefore, limited my review of the agreement to determining whether the terms thereof are a fair, adequate and reasonable settlement of Claimant's allegation that the Employer violated the SWD. Upon review of the terms of the agreement signed by the parties, and based on the record of this case, I find that the agreement is fair, adequate and reasonable. I therefore accept the ALJ's recommendation that the agreement be approved. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Settlement Agreement, Section C(1). SO ORDERED. ROBERT B. REICH Secretary of Labor Washington, D.C.



Phone Numbers