BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Case No. 96-ERA-40
IN THE MATTER OF
DAVID M. WIRFS
Complainant
v.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
and
GTS DURATEK
Respondents
RECOMMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The above case came on to be heard on the parties' motion to
dismiss, and, it appearing that the parties have agreed that the matters in controversy have been
fully conciliated; that the parties have further agreed that this proceeding should be dismissed
with full prejudice; and that the conciliation agreement, having been reviewed pursuant to 42
U.S. C. § 5851(b)(2)(1994), is fair to all parties and consistent with the provisions of law;
It is hereby RECOMMENDED that this proceeding be dismissed
with full prejudice.
Dated: April 30, 1997
Fletcher E. Campbell, Jr.
Administrative Law Judge
Brent R. Marquand
Tennessee Valley Authority
400 West Summit Hill Drive
Knoxville, Tennessee 37902-1499
Telephone No. 423-632-4251
Attorney for Respondent
Tennessee Valley Authority
Richard J. Hafets
Beth A. Winograd
Piper & Marbury L.L.P.
Baltimore, Maryland 21201
Telephone No. 410-539-2530
Attorneys for Respondent
GTS Duratek
Scarlett May
Hickman & Ferraris
800 Gay Street, Suite 2111
Knoxville, Tennessee 37902
Telephone No. 423-525-1501
Attorney for Complainant
David M. Wirfs
000002979
NOTICE: This recommended Order and the administrative file in the matter will be
forwarded for decision to the Administrative Review Board, Room S-4309, Frances Perkins
Bldg., 200 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20210. See 61 Fed. Reg. 19978 and 19982
(1996).
