U.S. Department of Labor Office of Administrative Law Judges
Commerce Plaza
603 Pilot House Drive, Suite 300
Newport News, VA 23606
DATE: May 15, 1997
CASE NO.: 96-ERA-11
IN THE MATTER OF
COBIA OUSLEY EDGEMON,
Complainant
v.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY,
Respondent.
RECOMMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The above case came to be heard on the parties'
joint motion to dismiss, and, it appearing that the parties have
agreed that the matters in controversy in this proceeding have
been fully conciliated; that the parties have further agreed that
this proceeding should be dismissed with full prejudice; and that
the conciliation agreement, having been reviewed pursuant to 42
U.S.C. §5851(b)(2)(A)(1994), is fair to all parties and
consistent with the provisions of law;
The parties provided a signed memorandum of
understanding and agreement, and that will be attached to this
order.
As the Complainant originally requested a
promotion to SD-4 as of July 1993, as well as damages, this
office inquired with counsel regarding Complainant's relief. Mr.
Subit, in essence, informed a staff attorney advisor that
Rather than damages or promotion, Complainant
receives job security through enhanced
performance evaluation, clarification of job
duties, and assurances of continued work,
with a view towards possible promotion in the
future. At this time, there isn't much job
security at TVA. This settlement helps to
assure such security.
In light of McGlynn v. Pulsair, Inc., 93-CAA-2
[Page
2]
Secretary's decision issued on June 28, 1993), this agreement has
been reviewed pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules
of Civil Procedure.
The undersigned finds that the terms of the
settlement are fair, adequate, and reasonable. Therefore, it is
recommended that this case be dismissed with prejudice.
RICHARD K. MALAMPHY
Administrative Law Judge
RKM/ccb
Newport News, Virginia
NOTICE: This Recommended Decision and Order and the
administrative file in this matter will be forwarded for review
by the Secretary of Labor, Room S-4309, Frances Perkins Building,
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20210. The
Administrative Review Board has the responsibility to advise and
assist the Secretary in the preparation and the issuance of final
decisions in employee protection cases adjudicated under the
regulations of 29 C.F.R. Parts 24 and 1978. See 55 Fed.
Reg. 13250 (1990).