skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 9, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
DOL Home USDOL/OALJ Reporter

Rudock v. Southern California Edison Co., 2001-ERA-24 (ALJ June 7, 2002)


U.S. Department of LaborOffice of Administrative Law Judges
800 K Street, NW, Suite 400-N
Washington, DC 20001-8002
DOL Seal

Issue date: 07Jun2002

Case No.: 2001-ERA-00024

In the Matter of

STEVEN P. RUDOCK,
    Claimant

   v.

SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
    Respondent

RECOMMENDED ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT

   On June 4, 2002, the parties submitted their executed settlement agreement in this case. They have requested that the terms of the settlement be kept confidential, and that respondent's pre-disclosure notification rights under 29 C.F.R. §70.26 (2001) be protected. Accordingly, the terms of the settlement will not be outlined here. Further, both parties are represented by counsel; and since I have not heard the case and have no basis to determine the merits of the respective parties' positions, I have no basis to second-guess the parties regarding the terms of the settlement.

   Accordingly, it is recommended that the settlement agreement be approved.

       JEFFREY TURECK
       Administrative Law Judge



Phone Numbers