skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 9, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
DOL Home USDOL/OALJ Reporter
McQuay v. The Waldinger Corp., 85-ERA-33 (Sec'y Sept. 29, 1989)


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR

SECRETARY OF LABOR
WASHINGTON, D.C.

DATE: September 29, 1989
CASE NO. 85-ERA-33 IN THE MATTER OF

LLOYD MARTIN McQUAY,
    COMPLAINANT,

    v.

THE WALDINGER CORPORATION,
    RESPONDENT.

BEFORE: THE SECRETARY OF LABOR

ORDER TO SUBMIT SETTLEMENT

    On March 11, 1986, the administrative law judge (ALJ) in this case arising under the employee protection provision of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended (ERA), 42 U.S.C. § 5851 (1982), submitted a Recommended Decision and Order (R.D. and O.) which found that Respondent discriminated against Complainant when it laid him off in May, 1985. The ALJ recommended that Respondent be ordered to reinstate Complainant and pay him back pay. On April 22, 1986, the ALJ issued a Recommended Fee Award recommending that Respondent be ordered to pay Complainant over $15,000 in attorney's fees and costs. on January 9, 1987, the parties submitted a Withdrawal of Complaint


[Page 2]

and Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice (Stipulation), signed by counsel for each party and approved by the Complainant. The Stipulation states that pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a) (1) (ii) the parties stipulate that the Complaint in this case is withdrawn and the action is dismissed with prejudice.

    The Stipulation does not refer to a settlement in this case, and there is no copy of a settlement in the record. However, in these circumstances, where a case has proceeded to a hearing and a decision has been rendered by the ALJ, the facts indicate that the matter has been settled, rather than simply withdrawn. The Secretary has held a number of tires that a case under the ERA cannot be dismissed on the basis of a settlement unless the settlement has been reviewed and the Secretary has found that it is fair, adequate and reasonable. See Fuchko and Yunker v. Georgia Power Co., Case Nos. 89-ERA-9 and 89-ERA-10, Sec. Order, March 23, 1989, and cases cited therein, slip op. at 2 (copy appended).

    Accordingly, if the withdrawal of January 9, 1987, was the result of a settlement, the parties are ordered to submit a copy of the settlement agreement to me for review within thirty days of receipt of this order. If all the parties, including the Complainant, have not signed the settlement agreement itself, the parties shall submit a certification or stipulation, signed by all the parties to the agreement, including the Complainant individually, demonstrating their informed consent to the agreement. If the withdrawal of January 9, 1987, was not the result of a settlement of these claims, the parties may submit a declaration to that effect pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1746.

    SO ORDERED.

       ELIZABETH DOLE
       Secretary of Labor

Washington, D.C.



Phone Numbers