skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 9, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
DOL Home USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Henderson v. Allied Radiological Control, 91-ERA-39 (Sec'y Nov. 24, 1992)


DATE:  November 24, 1992
CASE NO. 91-ERA-39


IN THE MATTER OF
YVONNE HENDERSON,
          COMPLAINANT,
        v.
ALLIED RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL,
RESPONDENT.

BEFORE:  THE SECRETARY OF LABOR

                   ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT
                       AND DISMISSING CASE
    This case is before me for review of the Recommended
Decision and Order Approving Settlement of the Chief
Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in this case under the employee
protection provision of the Energy Reorganization Act, as amended
(ERA), 42 U.S.C. § 5851 (1988).  The ALJ recommends approval
of the settlement agreement.
    I have limited my review of the agreement to determining
whether its terms are a fair, adequate and reasonable settlement
of Complainant's allegation that Respondent violated the ERA.[1]
See Poulos v. Ambassador Fuel Oil Co., Inc., Case
No. 86-CAA-1, Sec. Ord., Nov. 2, 1987, slip op. at 2.  Upon review of the terms
of the agreement and the record, I find that the agreement is
fair, adequate and reasonable, and I approve it.  Accordingly,
the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.  Settlement Agreement
¶ 1.
SO ORDERED.
                              LYNN MARTIN
                              Secretary of Labor



Washington, D.C.

[ENDNOTES]
[1] The parties signed separate settlement agreements that are identical in their operative terms. 
The separate filings will be treated as one agreement.  See Nunn v. Duke
Power Co., Case No. 84-ERA-27, Ord. of Dismissal, Sept. 29, 1989, slip op.
at 2.



Phone Numbers