skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 9, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
DOL Home USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Rex v. Ebasco Services, Inc., 87-ERA-6 (Sec'y Apr. 13, 1987)


U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
SECRETARY OF LABOR
WASHINGTON, D.C.

DATE: April 13, 1987
CASE NO.: 87-ERA-6

IN THE MATTER OF

JOHN REX,
    COMPLAINANT,

    v.

EBASCO SERVICES, INC.,
    RESPONDENT.

BEFORE: THE SECRETARY OF LABOR

DECISION AND ORDER OF REMAND TO THE
WAGE AND HOUR ADMINISTRATOR

   The Preliminary Decision and Order on Timeliness of Complaint of Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) Joel R. Williams (ALJ Decision), issued on January 27, 1987, in the above-captioned case which arises under the employee protection provision of the Energy Reorganization Act (Act), 42 U.S.C. § 5851 (1982), and the implementing regulations at 29 C.F.R. Part 24 (1986), is before me for review pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 24.6.

   The Texas Area Director of the Wage and Hour Administration rejected John Rex's complaint as untimely filed under the Act's thirty-day filing requirement because the envelope containing the complaint was postmarked October 22, 1986, thirty-one days


[Page 2]

after Mr. Rex was notified of his termination. On appeal, the ALJ found that Mr. Rex's complaint was mailed on October 21, 1986, based upon the date on the complaint itself and the affidavit of Mr. Rex's attorney, which states, in part:

    I was retained by John C. Rex on October 16, 1986 to prepare a complaint pursuant to Section 120 of the Energy Reorganization Act.

    After the preliminary interview and investigation a complaint was prepared and finalized on October 21, 1986.

    The complaint was placed in the United States Mail, postage prepaid, on October 21, 1986. The complaint was placed into a mail box in front of the post office in Appleton, Wisconsin between 6:00 pm and 6:30 pm. The mail box stated on the out side that the last pick up was at 7 pm.

    After complainant's attorney learned of the position of the Wage and Hour Division that they considered the complaint not timely filed complainant contacted the post office to learn of the procedures for processing mail out of Appleton, Wisconsin. Complainant's attorney was informed by the window clerk that mail from Appleton and other northeastern Wisconsin cities was picked up by truck and taken to Oshkosh, Wisconsin which is the processing station for all mail in the area. She was also informed that although mail placed in the mailbox designated for last pick up at 7 pm was generally postmarked on the day it was mailed that any one or combination of numerous factors could have occurred delaying the postmarking in Oshkosh, Wisconsin of a letter filed in Appleton, Wisconsin.

Affidavit of Billie Pirner Garde. See ALJ Decision at 2.

   The ALJ held that the mailing of the complaint on October 21, 1986, met the thirty-day filing requirement in the Act and 29 C.F.R. § 24.3(b) because the period for filing commenced on September 21, 1986, the date Mr. Rex returned from his vacation and read Respondent's termination notice, which had been delivered during Mr. Rex's absence. See ALJ Decision at 2-4. The ALJ remanded the case to the Wage


[Page 3]

and Hour Administrator for an investigation on a priority basis pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 24.4. Id. at 5.

   After consideration of the record before the ALJ, I adopt his findings and conclusions. Accordingly, this case is remanded to the Wage and Hour Administrator for an investigation of Mr. Rex's complaint on a priority basis.

   SO ORDERED.

      WILLIAM E. BROCK
       Secretary of Labor

Washington, D.C.



Phone Numbers