BEFORE THE OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JUDGES
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Case No. 91-ERA-10
IN THE MATTER OF
JIMMIE L. BUCK
Complainant
v.
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
Respondent
RECOMMENDED ORDER OF DISMISSAL
During a telephone conference on October 9, 1991,
complainant Jimmie L. Buck requested that this proceeding be
dismissed. Ms. Buck was advised that the statute of limitations
would preclude her from bringing the same claims in the future.
Counsel for respondent Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) stated
that TVA has no objection to complainant's voluntary dismissal
of this proceeding. Since no settlement is involved in this
case and both parties have stipulated, as evidenced by the
signatures below, that this proceeding should be dismissed, it
is hereby recommended that this proceeding be dismissed
pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(ii), Fed. R. Civ. P., and 29 C.F.R.
§ 18.1(a) (1990). See Denayer v. Tennessee Valley Authority,
No. 91-ERA-32 (July 22, 1991) (copy attached); Nunn v. Duke
Power Co., No. 84-ERA-27 (Sept. 29, 1989); Hooks v. Transportation
Servs., Inc., No. 88-STA-7 (June 24, 1988). The hearing
scheduled for October 22, 1991, is hereby cancelled.
It is so Ordered.
MICHAEL P. LESNIAK
Administrative Law Judge
We agree to the terms of
this order and hereby request
that it be entered:
Jimmie L. Buck
Complainant
Brent R. Marquand
Senior Litigation Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Tennessee Valley Authority
400 West Summit Hill Drive
Knoxville, Tennessee 37902-1499
