U.S. Department of Labor
Office of Administrative Law Judges
211 Main Street - Suite 600
San Francisco. California 94 105
Commercial (415) 744-6577
Government 8-484-6577
CASE NO. 90-ERA-1
In the Matter of
RAMESH JAIN
Complainant
v.
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
Respondent
ORDER ON PRE-HEARING MOTIONS
Respondent's Motion for Dismissal, filed November 13, 1989,
is denied, subject to renewal as a Motion for Summary Decision at
the close of hearing.
Complainant's request, filed November 15, 1989, for an order
to produce Warn Peabody as a witness is denied. Each party is
responsible for producing its own witnesses; further, considering
the expedited procedures applicable to this proceeding, the short
time remaining (less than two work-days) before the scheduled
hearing, complainant's assertions regarding the testimony to be
elicited, and his own ability and opportunity to testify concerning
the same matter(s), the use of a subpoena for this purpose is
deemed inappropriate.