Office of Administrative Law Judges 50 Fremont Street, Suite 2100
San Francisco, CA 94105
(415) 744-6577 (415) 744-6569
(FAX)
DATE: August 21, 2000
CASE NUMBER 2000-STA-3
In the Matter of
TY A. MARZIALE,
COMPLAINANT,
v.
CAMPORA PROPANE SERVICE, INC.,
RESPONDENT.
DECISION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING
COMPLAINT
This proceeding arises under the provisions of Section 405 of the Surface
Transportation Assistance Act, 49 U.S.C. §31105 (hereinafter referred to as "the
Act" or "the STAA"). On August 21, 2000 the parties entered into a proposed
settlement agreement that, if approved by the undersigned administrative law judge, would resolve
all disputed issues and allow for the dismissal of this matter with prejudice.
As required by the relevant regulations and statutory provisions, I have
carefully reviewed the entire agreement to determine if it should be approved. After doing so, I have
concluded that the terms of the agreement are, in fact, fair, adequate, and reasonable and that the
agreement should therefore be approved.1
1In this regard, it is noted that although
most administrative law judge decisions under the STAA do not become final until reviewed and
approved by the Administrative Review Board (ARB), administrative law judge decisions
approving proposed settlement agreements become final without such review or approval. Pettit
v. Des Moines Asphalt & Paving Co., 96-STA-3 (ARB Dec. 30, 1996); Perrine v. Packard
Elec., Inc., 93-STA-34 (Sec'y March 17, 1994); Cappelluci v. Whaleco Oil Co., 94-
STA-15 (Sec'y July 19, 1994); Swisher v. Gerber Childrenswear, Inc., 93-STA-1 (Sec'y
Jan. 4, 1993); Arledge v. Scottserve, Inc., 92-STA-25 (Sec'y June 16, 1993).