Dated:  February 7, 1994

GERALD E. MCCOY
     Complainant

     v.

UTAH POWER/PACIFIC POWER
     Respondent

94-CAA-1
94-CAA-6


           RECOMMENDED ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINTS

     
     The parties have entered into a settlement agreement
covering the two Clear Air Act cases before me and a multi-count
case pending in Federal Court in Utah.  The memorandum regarding
this settlement agreement filed by the parties[1]  states that,
in exchange for resigning as an employee and dropping all three
of these cases, the complainant will receive a consulting
contract guaranteeing him 100 hours of consulting work a month
for three years, as well as health insurance paid by the
respondent.

     I find this settlement agreement to be reasonable, and IT
IS RECOMMENDED that complainant's motion to dismiss 94-CAA-1
and 94-CAA-6 be granted.


                                   ____________________________
                                   JEFFREY TURECK
                                   Administrative Law Judge



[ENDNOTES]
              
[1]   For reasons of confidentiality, the actual settlement
agreement was not submitted.