skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 9, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
DOL Home Legislative History, Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7622, H.R. Rep. No. 294



(H.R. Rep. No. 294, reprinted in 1977 U.S. Code Cong. & Admin. News 1077,1404-05)

Section 306--Employee Protection

Background

In the course of 1975 subcommittee hearings, testimony was received recommending inclusion of an "employee protection" provision, similar to that contained in the Safe Drinking Water Act (Public Law 93-523) and in the Federal Water Pollution Act (Public Law 92-500):

  • This amendment would prohibit employers from discriminating, discharging or otherwise penalize [sic] their employees who initiate law suits under the Clean Air Act, testify in public hearings or court proceedings against their employees in air pollution cases, or otherwise involve themselves in such administrative or legal proceedings. The best source of information about what a company is actually doing or not doing is often its own employees, and this amendment would insure that an employee could provide such information without losing his job or otherwise suffering economically from retribution from the polluter. (H. 217)
  • This provision has received support not [sic] from the National Clean Air Coalition and the U.S. League of Women Voters (H. 720), but also from various labor unions. The current Clean Air Act contains no such provision.


    Committee Proposal

    Section 306 of the committee bill would establish a new section 317 of the act. That section contains provisions to protect employees from discharge, discrimination, or other retaliation which adversely affects the terms and conditions of employment due to an employee's participation in, or assistance to, the administration, implementation, or enforcement of the Clean Air Act or any requirements promulgated pursuant to it. These requirements would include any State or local require- ments which are incorporated in the applicable implementation plan as well as any such requirements adopted pursuant to section 116 of the act.

    Retaliatory action by the employer would also be prohibited if it were in response to an employee's exercise of rights under Federal, State, or local Clean Air Act legislation or regulations. This would be the case even if the employee's action was not directed against the employer (e.g., the filing of a citizen suit against the Administrator or against another company). Moreover, as in the Safe Drinking Water Act and the Federal Water Pollution Act, the employer would not have to be proven to be in violation of a Clean Air Act requirement in order for this section to protect the employee's action.

    The section establishes an administrative procedure for resolution of allegations of violation of the prohibition against employer retaliation. The Secretary of Labor is charged with the responsibility to investigate complaints under this section. At the conclusion of the investigation the Secretary must either deny the complaint, or uphold the complaint and order the specified relief, unless a settlement is reached to which the complainant consents in writing.

    The Secretary's order--whether denying or upholding the complaint--is reviewable in U.S. Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit, but is not reviewable in any other judicial forum.

    If a person fails to comply with the Secretary's order, the Secretary must file a civil action to enforce the order. In such an enforcement action, the Federal district courts would be authorized, and have jurisdiction to, issue appropriate relief, including injunctive relief, compensatory or exemplary damages.

    The section is made inapplicable, however, to any employee who deliberately causes a violation of the act or any Federal, State, or local requirements. This section is applicable, of course, to Federal, State, or local employees to the same extent as any employee of a private employer.



    Phone Numbers