skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 9, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
DOL Home USDOL/OALJ Reporter
House v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 92-ERA-9 (Sec'y Jan. 4, 1993)


DATE:  January 4, 1993
CASE NO. 92-ERA-9


IN THE MATTER OF

JAMES E. HOUSE,

          COMPLAINANT,

     v.

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY,

          RESPONDENT.


BEFORE:  THE SECRETARY OF LABOR


                         FINAL ORDER OF DISMISSAL

     Before me for review is the Recommended Decision and Order
(R.D. and O.) of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in this case
arising under the employee protection provision of the Energy
Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended (ERA), 42 U.S.C. §
5851 (1988).  The ALJ recommends dismissal of the complaint on
the merits, concluding that Complainant failed to establish a
prima facie case of retaliation for protected activity in
violation of the Act.  An Order Establishing Briefing Schedule
was issued on October 27, 1992.  
     Complainant filed a Notice, dated November 25, 1992,
indicating his desire to withdraw the claim.  Respondent filed a
response letter, dated December 4, 1992, stating there is no
objection to Complainant's voluntary dismissal of this case
without liability for payment of fees and costs, and further
indicating that there is no settlement involved.  
     It well settled that voluntary dismissals of ERA complaints
are covered by Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 
Rainey v. State University, Case No. 90-ERA-40, Sec. Order
to 

[PAGE 2] Show Cause, Jan. 7, 1991, slip op. at 3 (citing Nolder v. Kaiser Engineers, Inc., Case No. 84-ERA-5, Sec. Final Dec. and Order, June 28, 1985, slip op. at 6-7); Sec. Order of Dismissal, Feb. 27, 1991. The filings before me indicate that the parties have chosen of their own accord to have the case unconditionally dismissed. Respondent's written response that it does not object to Complainant's voluntary dismissal and that it will bear its own costs and fees, together with Complainant's notice of voluntary dismissal, may be deemed to constitute a stipulation of dismissal by the parties satisfying the requirements of Rule 41(a)(1)(ii). Accordingly, the complaint is dismissed without prejudice. SO ORDERED. LYNN MARTIN Secretary of Labor Washington, D.C.



Phone Numbers