U.S. Department of Labor Office of Administrative Law Judges
800 K Street, NW
Washington, D.C. 20001-8002
DATE: November 26, 1996
CASE NO.: 96-STA-16
In the Matter of
ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF LABOR FOR
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH,
Party-in-Interest,
and
MARY McCLANE,
Complainant/Prosecuting Party,
v.
WHEELER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES,
Respondent.
DECISION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING
COMPLAINT
This proceeding arises under section 405
of the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982, as amended
[Page 2]
(codified at 49 U.S.C. § 31105 [formerly section 2305]) and
the implementing regulations appearing at 29 C.F.R. Part 1978.
It was initiated by a complaint filed on or about February 15,
1995 with the Secretary of Labor, acting through the Regional
Administrator for the Occupational Safety and Health
Administration in Region VII.
This case was set for a hearing before the
undersigned administrative law judge on April 8 and 9, 1996 in
Omaha, Nebraska, but the hearing was cancelled based upon advice
from counsel for the Assistant Secretary that the parties had
reached a tentative settlement in the above-captioned matter.
Subsequently, the Assistant Secretary filed a notice of
withdrawal of representation pursuant to 29 C.F.R.
§ 1978.111(d)(3). Following a conference call held in
the above-captioned matter on June 6, 1996, the parties requested
[Page 3]
additional time to discuss settlement. By letter of September
19, 1996, the parties advised that they wished to have a
settlement judge appointed, in accordance with 29 C.F.R.
§ 18.9(e).
On September 27, 1996, Chief
Administrative Law Judge John M. Vittone issued an Order
Appointing Settlement Judge which appointed Administrative Law
Judge Robert Hillyard to act as a settlement judge. Thereafter,
the parties reached a settlement that they submitted to Judge
Hillyard for approval by letter of November 19, 1996. In
accordance with 29 C.F.R. § 18.9(e)(1), Judge Hillyard
transferred the executed settlement agreement to me for review
and approval as presiding judge.
The Settlement Agreement is appended hereto
as Exhibit A and made a part hereof. The Settlement Agreement
has been duly executed by the Complainant and the Respondent, and
I have also signed it in lieu of Judge Hillyard. Approval of the
Settlement Agreement by the original Prosecuting Party, the
Assistant Secretary for Occupational Safety and Health, was
unnecessary in view of the Assistant Secretary's withdrawal as
the prosecuting party pursuant to 29 C.F.R. §
1978.111(d)(3). I have reviewed the Settlement Agreement and
find that it resolves the issues in this proceeding and is fair,
adequate, and reasonable. While I note that in several places in
the Settlement Agreement, the word "Complaint" appears
instead of "Complainant," it is obvious from the
context that "Complainant" was intended. I also note
that a period appears instead of a comma on line 10 of page 2,
but the meaning of the sentence is clear. I therefore find these
typographical errors to be of no consequence and to not affect
the validity of the Settlement Agreement. Accordingly, I enter
the following:
ORDER
1. The Settlement Agreement is fair,
adequate, and reasonable and is hereby APPROVED, in
accordance with 29 C.F.R. § 1978.111(d)(2) and 29 C.F.R.
§ 18.9.
2. The entire record on which this Order is
based shall consist solely of the Complaint and the Settlement
[Page 4]
Agreement.
3. This Order incorporating the Settlement
Agreement shall have the same force and effect as an Order made
after a full hearing, and the parties are deemed to have waived
any further procedural steps before the undersigned
administrative law judge or the right to contest the validity of
this Order incorporating the Settlement Agreement, in accordance
with 29 C.F.R. § 18.9(b).
4. The complaint in this case is hereby
DISMISSED.