skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 9, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
DOL Home USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Jackson v. Crewe Transfer, 95-STA-27 (ALJ Nov. 8, 1995)


DATE:          November 8, 1995

CASE NO.:      95-STA-27
                            
IN THE MATTER OF            

THEODORE  R.  JACKSON,             
          Complainant,      
  
     v.

CREWE  TRANSFER,  
          Respondent.



  DECISION AND ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND
            MOTION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE

     This is a proceeding under the provisions of Section 405 of
the Surface Transportation Assistance Act of 1982  (STAA or the
"ACT") 49 U.S.C. 2305, which provides protection to employees in
the trucking industry from discrimination on account of activity
related to commercial motor vehicle safety.

     On October 30, 1995, the parties filed a pleading styled
"STIPULATED ORDER OF DISMISSAL".  The parties were instructed to
and did forward a copy of the General Release and Settlement
Agreement dated November 3, 1995 for review by this ALJ.  It
contains ten stipulations and a request that the proceeding be
dismissed with prejudice.  The agreement between the parties is
incorporated herein by reference.

     My review of the settlement agreement is limited to a
determination of whether its terms are fair, adequate and
reasonable.  The settlement must adequately protect the
whistleblower.  Furthermore, the settlement must not be contrary
to public interest.  



[PAGE 2] First, I note that the parties are represented by counsel. In reaching an agreement, Respondent does not admit it has broken any law or regulation. Nor is the agreement to be construed as an admission of liability or wrong doing by Respondent. Moreover, Complainant waives his right to sue in the future on claims or causes of action arising out of facts occurring prior to the date of the execution of the agreement. Also, Complainant agrees that he is not entitled to reinstatement under the agreement. After consideration of the settlement agreement, I find that none of the terms or conditions are unacceptable. Moreover, I find the agreement to be fair, adequate and reasonable, and I believe it is in the public interest to adopt the agreement as a basis for the administrative disposition of this case. Therefore, I approve the settlement. Further the motion to dismiss with prejudice is hereby granted. DANIEL A. SARNO, JR. Administrative Law Judge DAS/CCB Newport News, Virginia NOTICE: This Decision and Order and the administrative file will be forwarded for review by the Secretary of Labor to the Office of Administrative Appeals, U. S. Department of Labor, Room S-4309, Frances Perkins Building, 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20210. The Office of Administrative Appeals has the responsibility to advise and assist the Secretary in the preparation and issuance of final decisions in employee protection cases and adjudicated under the regulations at 29 C.F.R. Parts 24 and 1978. See 55 Fed. Reg. 13250 (1990).



Phone Numbers