skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 9, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > Miscellaneous Collection
DOL Home USDOL/OALJ Reporter

USDOL v Fifth Avenue Limousine Service, Inc., 1999-FLS-10 (ALJ Aug. 31, 1999)


U.S. Department of LaborOffice of Administrative Law Judges
525 Vine Street, Suite 900
Cincinnati, OH 45202

(513) 684-3252
(513) 684-6108 (FAX)

DOL Seal

Date: August 31, 1999

Case No.: 1999-FLS-10

In the Matter of:

ALEXIS HERMAN, Secretary of Labor
U.S. Department of Labor
    Plaintiff

    v.

FIFTH AVENUE LIMOUSINE SERVICE, INC.
    Respondent

DECISION AND ORDER

   This case arises under Section 16(e) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq., § 216(e), and in accordance with applicable regulations found at 29 C.F.R. Parts 578 and 580. A civil money penalty in the amount of $2,125.00 was assessed against Respondent as a result of repeated or willful violation of the overtime provisions of Section 7 of the Act.

   On July 22, 1999, counsel submitted Consent Findings signed by James H. Angevine, counsel for Plaintiff, and Paul E. Stanzler, counsel for the Respondent. The Consent Findings disclose that the amount of the penalty asserted by Plaintiff has been reduced to ,900.00 and the Respondent is now withdrawing its exception to the assessment and agrees to the modified penalty as final and binding.

   Counsel have submitted the Consent Findings for entry pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 18.9 of the Rules of Practice and Procedure for Administrative Hearings Before the Office of Administrative Law Judges. Entry of the Consent Findings in this case under 29 C.F.R. § 18.9 is precluded as a result of the Administrative Review Board Decision in Indiana Department of Workforce Development v. U.S. Department of Labor, ARB Case No. 98-155 (Dec. 8, 1998); ALJ Case No. 97-JTP-15.


[Page 2]

   The parties are notified pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 18.1(b) that the Administrative Law Judge is hereby waiving all deferment requirements mentioned within 29 C.F.R. § 18.9 based upon a determination that no party will be prejudiced and that the ends of justice will be served thereby. Any party who is aggrieved by the waiver action should move for reconsideration of this Order within ten days from the date of its entry. Since the deferment provisions are no longer applicable to the administrative disposition of this case, counsels' request for the entry of the Consent Findings pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 18.9 is hereby approved. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are inapplicable to the disposition of this matter.

   Upon a review of the record, the Consent Findings are formally approved. IT IS ORDERED that:

1. This Order shall have the same force and effect as an Order made after full hearing;

2. The entire record upon which this Order is based shall consist solely of the Order of Reference and these Consent Findings;

3. Any further procedural steps before this office are waived; and

4. Any rights to challenge or contest the validity of this Order entered into in accordance with this agreement are hereby waived with the exception of the possible reconsideration request pertaining to the waiver of the deferment provisions.

   IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is hereby dismissed.

      Rudolf L. Jansen
      Administrative Law Judge



Phone Numbers