skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 9, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > Miscellaneous Collection
DOL Home USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Phoenix Organization, Inc., 96-CLA-19 (ALJ Dec. 18, 1996)

U.S. Department of Labor
Office of Administrative Law Judges
800 K Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001-8002

Date Issued: December 18, 1996

Case No.: 96-CLA-19

In the Matter of

PHOENIX ORGANIZATION, INC.
d/b/a HARDEES RESTAURANT and
MELVIN P. KERR, an Individual,
    Respondents

Before: JOHN M. VITTONE
    Chief Administrative Law Judge

DECISION AND ORDER

    This case arises under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA), as amended 29 U.S.C. § 216(e) et seq. and the regulations at 29 C.F.R. Parts 579 and 580.

    By notice dated August 23, 1996, the Wage and Hour Division of the United States Department of Labor (DOL) notified Phoenix Organization, Inc. d/b/a Hardees Restaurant and Melvin Kerr (Respondents) of an assessment of a civil money penalty ($46,100). DOL alleged that Respondents violated the child labor provisions of Section 12 of FLSA and the regulations thereunder. Respondents filed a timely exception to the assessment. On April 12, 1996, DOL filed an Order of Reference with this Office. This Office issued a Notice of Docketing on May 2, 1996. The Notice of Docketing instructed the parties to exchange and submit certain information to this Office. On May 13, 1996, DOL filed a response to the Notice of Docketing.

    Due to failure of Respondents to comply with the Notice of Docketing, DOL filed a Motion to Strike Respondents' Letter of Exception and Request for a Hearing (Motion for Default Judgment) on September 19, 1996. On October 16, 1996, this Office issued an Order directing Respondents to show cause why a default decision should not be entered in this case. To date,Respondents have failed to respond to the Notice of Docketing, the Motion for Default Judgment, and the Order to Show Cause. The regulations at 29 C.F.R. § 8.6(d)(2)(v) provide that:

If a party or an officer or agent of a party fails to comply with a subpoena or with an order, . . . or any other order of the administrative law judge, the administrative law judge, for the purpose of permitting resolution of the relevant issues and disposition of the proceeding without unnecessary delay despite such failure, may . . . [r]ule that a pleading, or part of a pleading, or a motion or other submission by the non-complying party, concerning which the order or subpoena was issued, be stricken, or that decision of the proceeding be rendered against the non-complying party, or both.

    After reviewing the record and considering Respondents' failure to participate in this matter, I hereby ORDER that a Judgment by Default be entered against Respondents. I adopt the material facts alleged in the Order of Reference as my findings of fact. Further, I hereby ORDER that Respondents pay a civil money penalty in the amount of $46,100 to DOL and that Respondent's request for hearing be DISMISSED.

      JOHN M. VITTONE
      Chief Administrative Law Judge

Washington, DC
JMV/CY/jsp



Phone Numbers