Neither Lesch nor Stoughton responded to the Board's order.
Accordingly, we GRANT Lesch's unopposed motion to withdraw his complaint.
SO ORDERED.
WAYNE C. BEYER
Administrative Appeals Judge
M. CYNTHIA DOUGLASS
Chief Administrative Appeals Judge
[ENDNOTES]
1 49 U.S.C.A. § 31105 (West 2008), as amended by the Implementing Recommendations of the 9/11 Commission Act of 2007, P.L. 110-53, 121 Stat. 266 (Aug. 3, 2007). Section 405 of the STAA provides protection from discrimination to employees who report violations of commercial motor vehicle safety rules or who refuse to operate a vehicle when such operation would violate those rules. The amended provisions are not at issue in this case and thus do not affect our decision.
2 29 C.F.R. Part 1978 (2007).
3 OSHA's Findings and Order, Feb. 19, 2008.
4 Id.
5 See 29 C.F.R. § 1978.105.
6 R. O. at 1. 29 C.F.R. § 1978.111(c) provides in relevant part:
At any time before the findings or order become final, a party may withdraw his objections to the findings or order by filing a written withdrawal with the administrative law judge or, if the case is on review, with the Administrative Review Board, United States Department of Labor.
7 See 29 C.F.R. § 1978.109(c)(1).
8 Secretary's Order 1-2002 (Delegation of Authority and Responsibility to the Administrative Review Board), 67 Fed. Reg. 64,272 (Oct. 17, 2002); 29 C.F.R. § 1978.109(a).
9 29 C.F.R. § 1978.109(c)(3); BSP Trans, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Labor, 160 F.3d 38, 46 (1st Cir. 1998); Castle Coal & Oil Co., Inc. v. Reich, 55 F.3d 41, 44 (2d Cir. 1995).
10 5 U.S.C.A. § 557(b) (West 1996).
11 See Roadway Express, Inc. v. Dole, 929 F.2d 1060, 1066 (5th Cir. 1991).
12 See 29 C.F.R. § 1978.109(c)(2).