Jump to main content.


Oil Pollution Prevention; Non-Transportation Related Onshore Facilities; Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Rule--Final Amendments

PDF Version (3 pp, 85K, About PDF)

[Federal Register: April 1, 2009 (Volume 74, Number 61)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 14736-14738]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr01ap09-12]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 112
[EPA-HQ-OPA-2007-0584; FRL-8788-5]
RIN 2050-AG16

Oil Pollution Prevention; Non-Transportation Related Onshore Facilities;
Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure Rule--Final Amendments

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
ACTION: Final rule; delay of effective date.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is delaying the
effective date of the final rule that amends the Spill Prevention,
Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC) regulations promulgated in the
Federal Register on December 5, 2008. The amendments will become
effective on January 14, 2010. EPA additionally is requesting public
comment on whether a further extension of the effective date may be warranted.

DATES: This document is effective April 1, 2009. The effective date of
the final rule (FR Doc. E8-28159), published in the Federal Register on
December 5, 2008 (73 FR 74236), that was delayed until April 4, 2009
(74 FR 5900), is further delayed to January 14, 2010.
    Comments must be received on or before May 1, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-
OPA-2007-0584, by one of the following methods:
    • http://www.regulations.gov: Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
    • Mail: EPA Docket, Environmental Protection Agency, Mail
Code: 2822T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460.
    • Hand Delivery: EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301
Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. Such deliveries are only
accepted during the Docket's normal hours of operation, and special
arrangements should be made for deliveries of boxed information.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OPA-
2007-0584. EPA's policy is that all comments received will be included
in the public docket without change and may be made available online at
http://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through http://
www.regulations.gov or e-mail. The http://www.regulations.gov Web site
is an ``anonymous access'' system, which means EPA will not know your
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without
going through http://www.regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of
any defects or viruses. For additional information about EPA's public
docket, visit the EPA Docket Center homepage at http://www.epa.gov/
epahome/dockets.htm.
    Docket: All documents in the docket are listed in index at the
http://www.regulations.gov. Although listed in the index, some
information may not be publicly available, such as Confidential
Business Information (CBI) or other information the disclosure of which
is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted
material, will be publicly available only in hard copy. Publicly
available docket materials are available either electronically at
http://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the EPA Docket, EPA/DC,
EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The
Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number of the Public
Reading Room is 202-566-1744, and the telephone number to make an
appointment to view the docket is 202-566-0276.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information, contact the
Superfund, TRI, EPCRA, RMP, and Oil

[[Page 14737]]

Information Center at 800-424-9346 or TDD at 800-553-7672 (hearing
impaired). In the Washington, DC metropolitan area, contact the
Superfund, TRI, EPCRA, RMP, and Oil Information Center at 703-412-9810
or TDD 703-412-3323. For more detailed information on specific aspects
of this final rule, contact either Vanessa E. Principe at 202-564-7913
(principe.vanessa@epa.gov), or Mark W. Howard at 202-564-1964
(howard.markw@epa.gov), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20460-0002, Mail Code 5104A.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 3, 2009 (74 FR 5900), EPA
delayed, by sixty days, the effective date of the final rule that
amends the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure (SPCC)
regulations that was promulgated in the Federal Register on December 5,
2008 (73 FR 74236) under section 311 of the Clean Water Act. This was
done in accordance with the January 20, 2009, White House memorandum
entitled ``Regulatory Review'' (74 FR 4435, January 26, 2009) and the
memorandum from the Office of Management and Budget entitled
``Implementation of Memorandum Concerning Regulatory Review'' (M-09-08,
January 21, 2009) (OMB memorandum). The Agency took that action to
ensure that the rule reflects proper consideration of all relevant
facts. In the February 3, 2009 notice (74 FR 5900), EPA requested
public comment on the extension of the effective date and its duration,
and on the regulatory amendments contained in the final rule. The SPCC
rule amendments clarify, tailor, and streamline certain existing
requirements for those facility owners or operators who are required to
prepare and implement an SPCC Plan (or ``Plan'') to prevent the
discharge of oil into or upon navigable waters of the United States or
adjoining shorelines.
    EPA received 57 comments in response to the February 3, 2009
notice. Several comments addressed the effective date for the December
2008 rule amendments. Specifically, three commenters suggested the rule
become effective on April 4, 2009, particularly for provisions related
to onshore, non-oil production facilities, while one commenter
requested that EPA finalize the rule expeditiously to ensure time to
conduct outreach efforts. On the other hand, one commenter suggested
the rule not become effective on April 4, 2009 and requested that the
rule be withdrawn permanently, or the effective date extended
indefinitely until the 2008 proposed amendments can be carefully
reconsidered. Other commenters provided recommendations related to
specific amendments, such as the optional approaches for produced water
containers, the criteria for qualified oil production facilities, and
other amendments. Consistent with the January 21, 2009 OMB memorandum
``Implementation of Memorandum Concerning Regulatory Review,'' the EPA
Administrator has chosen this rule for additional assessment of policy
and legal issues; therefore, EPA must carefully consider the issues
raised in these comments. Because EPA cannot adequately address the
comments before an April 4, 2009 effective date, the Agency agrees with
the comment in support of delaying the effective date. With this
action, the Agency is extending the effective date of the December 5,
2008 SPCC amendments and is requesting public comment on whether a
further extension of the effective date may be warranted. The Agency
will provide a complete discussion of the comments received specific to
the amendments, and its response to those comments, in a Federal
Register notice describing any changes to the 2008 amendments.
    The effective date of the final rule would have been April 4, 2009.
With this extension, the amendments will become effective on January
14, 2010.
    This rule is effective immediately. Section 553(d) of the
Administrative Procedures Act requires 30 days notice before the
effective date of a final rule. However, section 553(d)(1) allows an
exception to the 30-day notice where a rule relieves a restriction.
Because this final rule relieves a restriction, the Agency invokes
section 553(d)(1) to allow an immediate effective date.
    Finally, the Agency is also reviewing the dates by which owners or
operators of facilities must prepare or amend their SPCC Plans, and
implement those Plans. EPA intends to address these dates in a separate
notice.

Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866--Regulatory Planning and Review

    This action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under the
terms of Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and is
therefore not subject to review under the Executive Order.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This action does not impose any new information collection burden.
This action results in no changes to the information collection
requirements of the SPCC rule and will have no impact on the
information collection estimate of project cost and hour burden
previously submitted to OMB.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency
to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to
notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative
Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses,
small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
    For purposes of assessing the impacts of today's rule on small
entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business as defined
by the Small Business Administration's (SBA) regulations at 13 CFR
121.201; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of
a city, county, town, school district or special district with a
population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is
any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated
and is not dominant in its field. After considering the economic
impacts of today's final rule on small entities, I certify that this
action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. In determining whether a rule has a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities,
the impact of concern is any significant adverse economic impact on
small entities, since the primary purpose of the regulatory flexibility
analyses is to identify and address regulatory alternatives ``which
minimize any significant economic impact of the rule on small
entities.'' 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. Thus, an agency may certify that a
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, or
otherwise has a positive economic effect on all of the small entities
subject to the rule.
    This action is delaying the effective date of the final rule that
amends the SPCC regulations promulgated in the Federal Register on
December 5, 2008. We have therefore concluded that today's final rule
will relieve regulatory burden for all affected small entities.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    This action contains no Federal mandates under the provisions of
Title II of the Unfunded Mandates Reform

[[Page 14738]]

Act of 1995 (UMRA), 2 U.S.C. 1531- 1538 for state, local, or tribal
governments or the private sector. This action imposes no enforceable
duty on any state, local, or tribal governments or the private sector.
Therefore, this action is not subject to the requirements of sections
202 and 205 of the UMRA. This action is also not subject to the
requirements of section 203 of UMRA because it contains no regulatory
requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small
governments. This action only delays the effective date of the December
5, 2008 rule and does not impose any additional enforceable duty.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

    Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure
``meaningful and timely input by state and local officials in the
development of regulatory policies that have federalism implications.''
``Policies that have federalism implications'' is defined in the
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct
effects on the states, on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
    This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have
substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between
the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as
specified in Executive Order 13132. This action will not impose direct
compliance costs on state or local governments, and will not preempt
state law. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this action.

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian
Tribal Governments

    This action does not have tribal implications, as specified in
Executive Order 13175 (59 FR 22951, November 9, 2000). It will not have
substantial direct effects on tribal governments, on the relationship
between the Federal government and Indian tribes, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
government and Indian tribes, as specified in Executive Order 13175.
Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997)
as applying to those regulatory actions that concern health or safety
risks, such that the analysis required under section 5- 501 of the
Executive Order has the potential to influence the regulation. This
action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23,
1997) because it is not economically significant as defined in
Executive Order 12866, and because the Agency does not believe the
environmental health or safety risks addressed by this action presents
a disproportionate risk to children.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, ``Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001) because it is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (NTTAA) (Pub. L. 104-113; section 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272
note) directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS) in its
regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical. VCS are technical standards
(e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and
business practices) that are developed or adopted by VCS bodies. NTTAA
directs EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when EPA
decides not to use available and applicable VCS. This action does not
involve technical standards. Therefore, EPA did not consider the use of
any VCS.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994) establishes
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs,
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income
populations in the United States.
    EPA has determined that this action will not have
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental
effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not
affect the level of protection provided to human health or the environment.

K. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801, et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
As stated previously, EPA has made such a good cause finding, including
the reasons therefore. EPA will submit a report containing this rule
and other required information to the United States Senate, the United
States House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the
United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

    Dated: March 26, 2009.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-7301 Filed 3-31-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P

 
 


Local Navigation


Jump to main content.