Research and Innovative Technology Administration (RITA)
Printable Version

Table B-2. Review of FHWA RD&T Program

Excel | CSV

Investment Criterion Program Evidence
Relevance •   Research program is mission-oriented and supports FHWA and DOT goals.
•   Stakeholders are engaged throughout the R&T process, including agenda setting and planning.
•   Stakeholders are involved in agenda setting and planning through the TRB Research and Technology Coordinating Committee, the National Partnership Initiative, and other advisory groups.
•   Stakeholders are engaged in the development of multi-year program plans, which are revisited annually.
•   External experts and advisory groups ensure program relevance throughout the research process itself.
•   Stakeholders are engaged in technology transfer and innovation delivery activities.
•   The program employs a number of mechanisms for customer feedback, including surveys and focus groups.
Quality •   Investment decisions are based on competition and merit review whenever possible.
•   External experts are consulted frequently during the conduct of research; merit reviews of results are encouraged.
•   An assessment process for the FHWA's 24 laboratories provides independent expert evaluation of research efforts.
Performance •   Stakeholders are involved in reviewing performance retrospectively.
•   The FHWA has conducted cost-benefit studies for elements of the program.
•   Program results are linked to the FHWA and DOT performance plans.
•   Performance is documented in an annual performance report.


RITA's privacy policies and procedures do not necessarily apply to external web sites. We suggest contacting these sites directly for information on their data collection and distribution policies.