U.S. Department of Labor
Administrative Review Board
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210
ARB CASE NO. 97-088
(ALJ CASE NO. 97-STA-2)
DATE: July 17, 1997
In the Matter of:
KIM NICHOLS,
COMPLAINANT,
v.
GORDON TRUCKING, INC.,
RESPONDENT.
BEFORE: THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD
FINAL DECISION AND ORDER
The record in this case arising under the Surface Transportation Assistance
Act of 1982, as amended, 49 U.S.C. § 31105 (West 1996 ) (STAA), has been fully
reviewed and we find that substantial evidence supports the Administrative Law Judge's
Recommended Decision and Order (R. D. & O.) that Respondent Gordon Trucking, Inc. did not
discriminate against Complainant Kim Nichols for activities protected by the STAA when it fired
him in April 1996. R. D. & O. at 7; 29 C.F.R. § 1978.109(c)(3) (1996). We note only the
following points about the ALJ's decision.
The ALJ found that Nichols was not motivated by highway safety in
objecting to Gordon Trucking's directions to haul trailers that were not pre-loaded. R. D. & O.
at 7. A complainant's motivation in making safety complaints has no bearing on whether the
complaints are protected. Pooler v. Snohomish County Airport, Case No. 87-TSC-1,
Sec'y. Dec. Feb. 14, 1994, slip op. at 5. In addition, in affirming the ALJ's decision as supported
by substantial evidence, we do not rely on the findings of the Oregon Employment Appeals Board.
In cases arising under the STAA, deference should be paid to the findings of another government
agency made in proceedings brought under different statutes only in limited circumstances. 29
C.F.R. § 1978.112.
Accordingly, the complaint in this case is DENIED.