The U.S. Department of Transportation
|
Year |
Rural Roadway |
Urban Roadway |
Total* |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fatalities |
% |
Rate** |
Fatalities |
% |
Rate** |
Fatalities |
Rate** |
|
1997 |
25,135 |
60% |
2.52 |
16,829 |
40% |
1.08 |
42,013 |
1.64 |
1998 |
25,185 |
61% |
2.44 |
16,219 |
39% |
1.02 |
41,501 |
1.58 |
1999 |
25,548 |
61% |
2.40 |
16,058 |
38% |
0.99 |
41,717 |
1.55 |
2000 |
24,838 |
59% |
2.29 |
16,113 |
38% |
0.97 |
41,945 |
1.53 |
2001 |
25,150 |
60% |
2.27 |
16,988 |
40% |
1.01 |
42,196 |
1.51 |
2002 |
25,896 |
60% |
2.30 |
17,013 |
40% |
0.98 |
43,005 |
1.51 |
2003 |
24,957 |
58% |
2.30 |
17,783 |
41% |
0.98 |
42,884 |
1.48 |
2004 |
25,179 |
59% |
2.36 |
17,581 |
41% |
0.93 |
42,836 |
1.44 |
2005 |
24,587 |
57% |
2.38 |
18,627 |
43% |
0.95 |
43,510 |
1.46 |
2006 |
23,339 |
55% |
2.25 |
18,359 |
43% |
0.93 |
42,642 |
1.41 |
Source: NCSA, FARS 1997-2005 (Final), 2006 (ARF), FHWA
* Total includes fatalities on unknown roadway
** Fatality rate per 100M VMT
Characteristics of Rural Crashes
By nearly every quantifiable measure, rural highway fatalities exceed the national average.
A Disproportionate Number of Fatalities: Although 23 percent of the U.S. population lived in rural areas in 2006, rural fatal crashes accounted for 55 percent of all traffic fatalities.
Less Exposure, Yet More Fatalities: While the majority of deaths occur on rural roads, fewer miles are driven there. In 2006, just over 1 trillion miles were driven on rural roads verses approximately 2 trillion miles on urban roads.
A Higher Fatality Rate: The fatality rate per 100 million vehicle miles traveled was more than double in rural areas than it was in urban areas (2.25 and 0.93 respectively).
Less Seat Belt Usage in Rural Areas: Fifty-seven percent of all the people who died on rural roads were not restrained, compared to 52 percent in urban areas. Last year, the seat belt use rate among occupants of vehicles in urban areas was 84 percent compared to 78 percent in rural areas. In 2006, 68 percent of fatally injured pickup truck drivers were unrestrained; the restraint use rate among these drivers is the lowest of any vehicle type.
More Speeding Fatalities: In 2006, 12,190 drivers involved in fatal crashes were speeding; 57 percent were drivers in rural areas.
More Impaired Driving Fatalities: Of the passenger vehicle occupant fatalities involving impaired driving crashes (BAC .08+) in 2006, 58 percent were in rural areas. At most blood alcohol concentration (BAC) levels, the percent of rural drivers involved in fatal crashes exceeds the percent of urban drivers involved at the same BAC.
A Lethal Combination: In 2006, rural drivers made up 62 percent of total drivers found to have been drinking, speeding and unrestrained.
Post-Crash: In 2006, 66 percent of rural drivers killed in crashes died at the scene, compared to 51 percent of urban drivers. Seventy-two percent of drivers who died en route to a hospital were in rural areas.
Most Fatalities Occur on Two-Lane Rural Roads: Nearly 50 percent of total highway fatalities occur on two-lane rural roads. The fatality rate overall on local roads is more than twice that of interstates (see Chart 1).
Chart 1: Fatality Rate by Roadway Type (2005)
Safety has always been the hallmark of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and continues to be the top priority. While great progress has been made in improving safety and reducing deaths nationally, the number of rural highway fatalities remains disproportionately large. This initiative is designed to bring new focus and a comprehensive approach to encourage safer drivers, better and smarter roads, better trained emergency responders, and stronger partnerships to help improve safety on America’s rural roads.
I. Safer Drivers
Seat Belts and Ignition Interlocks: NHTSA will fund four demonstration projects in rural areas to raise seat belt usage and/or promote greater deployment of ignition interlocks to combat drunk driving by repeat offenders. This program will offer grants to recipients to implement either of the following initiatives:
Sobriety Checkpoints: A concern smaller rural agencies have expressed is their ability to effectively conduct sobriety checkpoints due to a lack of resources. However, NHTSA has sponsored research that shows low staffing checkpoints (operated by five or fewer officers) can be just as effective as more traditional, larger checkpoints (20 or more officers). NHTSA has published guidelines and will continue to work with State and local officials to increase the use of low staffing checkpoints.
Preventing Rollovers: Higher-speed roads with curves and grades, fewer lanes, narrow or no shoulders, and ditches near the road are factors which contribute to vehicle loss-of-control in rural areas. Rollovers are particularly problematic in rural areas: 41 percent of passenger vehicle occupant fatalities in rural areas involved rollovers, versus 26 percent for urban areas. In 2007, NHTSA issued a Final Rule for Electronic Stability Control (ESC), which will significantly reduce rollovers. ESC helps the driver maintain control of the vehicle when it is dangerously under or over-steered. When fully deployed into the fleet, it is estimated that ESC will reduce single-vehicle crashes of passenger cars by 34 percent and single-vehicle crashes of sport utility vehicles by 59 percent.
In addition to ESC, NHTSA is developing performance standards to protect occupants during a rollover crash. New safety measures have been evaluated, including side curtain air bags designed to prevent rollover ejection. NHTSA expects to publish an NPRM for a rollover ejection mitigation requirement in 2008 and a final rule in 2009.
Commercial Vehicles: FMCSA is working with states to develop strategies for ensuring the safety of commercial vehicles on rural roadways and to include a component on rural commercial vehicle safety into each state’s annual Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan. This year’s guidance from the Department will focus on large truck fatalities occurring in work zones. Preliminary data shows that large-truck, work-zone fatalities account for nearly 5 percent of the approximately 5,000 large truck deaths each year. States will be requested to identify rural road crash and fatality problems and use grant funding to focus safety efforts in those areas.
II. Better Roads
Improving High Risk Rural Roads (HRRR): This program within the Highway Safety Improvement Program is available to states for high risk rural road projects under a provision in the most recent highway reauthorization law, SAFETEA-LU. Historically, the program has been underutilized as states have chosen to focus their funding on other priorities. The funds may be used for construction or operational improvements, such as adding or expanding shoulders, straightening dangerous curves and improving hazardous intersections. Through December 2007, states have only obligated an estimated $26 million of the $269 million ($90 million was set aside per year for fiscal years 2006 to 2008) in available HRRR program funds to improve safety on rural roads. The Department’s goal is to encourage states to tap into all the funding Congress has provided for this program.
Improving Rural Roads in the Delta Region: Approximately $9.2 million in available FY 2008 funding for the Delta Region Transportation Development Program will be targeted toward funding innovative safety projects in the Delta region, which consists of 240 counties in Alabama, Arkansas, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, and Tennessee. Typical projects include innovative safety infrastructure improvements, such as cable median barriers and rumble strips; innovative intersection improvements such as roundabouts; corridor safety improvements; and adding ITS features to infrastructure. Many of these solutions are relatively low cost, allowing states the opportunity to quickly and efficiently improve safety on rural roads.
Safety Circuit Rider: The Safety Circuit Rider pilot program is aimed at reducing crashes on two-lane rural roads by providing technical assistance and best practices for improving safety to local agencies. This highly successful pilot program has been tested in Kentucky, Florida, West Virginia and the Northern Plains Tribal Technical Assistance Program Center in North Dakota. Where improvements have been implemented in these states, crashes have been reduced. Twenty other states are implementing local safety circuit rider programs, and in September 2008, FHWA will publish a manual of proven safety measures to support further development and implementation.
III. Smarter Roads
University-Based Rural Safety Research: Sponsored by FHWA, the University of Minnesota’s Center for Excellence in Rural Safety (CERS) was established in SAFETEA-LU to provide research, training, and outreach on innovative uses of technology to enhance rural safety and economic development; assess local community needs to improve access to mobile emergency treatment; and develop online and seminar training for rural transportation practitioners and policy-makers.
Leading UTC research includes the development of an animal detection system that warns drivers in rural areas when wildlife such as deer and elk are on or near the roadway (Montana State’s Western Transportation Institute); field testing and analysis of collision avoidance technology at non-signalized rural highway intersections (University of Minnesota’s ITS Institute); analysis and recommendations for reducing night-time rural intersection collisions caused by ineffective road lighting (Iowa State); and analysis of factors contributing to accidents on two-lane rural roads (University of Washington).
Speed Management: This year, NHTSA and FHWA will work closely with states and rural communities to determine the best way to set speed limits on rural arterial and connector roads based on engineering data. Setting rational speed limits shows significant promise at reducing motor vehicle crashes on rural arterials and connectors.
This outreach and technical assistance builds on NHTSA and FHWA field tests, in which speed limits were set based on engineering studies. Using a new baseline for the new speed limit determination, the tests largely led to increasing the existing, posted speed limit by five to 15 miles per hour. The public overwhelmingly supported the new speeds, and compliance with the new speed limit increased from 5 percent to almost 50 percent.
Smarter Roads through ITS Technology: RITA will make $6 million available for partnerships with rural communities to test and expedite the deployment of Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) technologies and innovations that will reduce accidents on rural roadways. The Department’s ITS program focuses on providing drivers with real-time safety warnings, dynamic traffic and transit information, and advanced navigational tools to prevent accidents and ease congestion. The ITS program works collaboratively with industry to develop intelligent vehicles and intelligent infrastructure that can communicate to improve safety. Safety enhancements that are or will soon be available as a result of ITS technologies include:
The Department will select rural partner communities with significant and quantifiable safety hazards that have identified high-impact, leading-edge ITS solutions and work with these communities to test the new technologies. Results will be evaluated and examples and best practices will be published for other rural communities that are facing similar safety challenges.
Further information on potential safety applications of ITS in rural areas can be found at http://www.itsdocs.fhwa.dot.gov/index.htm or http://www.its.dot.gov/index.htm.
IV. Better Trained Emergency Responders
The Automatic Crash Notification and Wireless Enhanced 9-1-1: Rapid, accurate location of motor vehicle crashes combined with excellent post-crash emergency medical care is essential to reducing rural road deaths. In rural areas, emergency response to crashes faces a variety of challenges, including delays in the discovery of the crash, sporadic cell coverage hindering the placement of an emergency call, dispatching emergency responders, and the long distances to reach crash victims and transport them to medical care.
The Automatic Crash Notification and Wireless Enhanced 9-1-1 projects will provide geographic location information that enables emergency responders to locate motor vehicle crashes, as well as provide crash mechanism data that helps to predict serious injury. Next Generation 9-1-1 technology improves transmission of these data, helps ensure the correct emergency services are promptly dispatched, improves triage decisions by dispatch and EMS personnel, and expedites both the delivery of emergency services and the transportation of patients to definitive medical care.
This year, NHTSA will initiate a grant program that will assist public safety answering points (PSAPs) in upgrading their capability to receive emergency calls from Geographical Information System (GIS)-enabled cell phones and determine the geographic location of the caller. The Department is currently working with Helena, Mont.; Rochester, N.Y.; Seattle, Wash.; St. Paul, Minn.; and the State of Indiana to test the capability of the Next Generation 9-1-1 network to transmit digital pictures, video, email and text messages that will give emergency personnel the critical information they need to respond quickly and appropriately to incidents.
Emergency Medical Services: NHTSA is helping to develop National Trauma Field Triage Protocols to guide EMS providers in expediting transport of seriously injured patients to trauma centers. NHTSA’s National EMS Information System (NEMSIS) will aid in evaluation and improvement of pre-hospital trauma and EMS care. NHTSA has developed a Rural EMS Medical Director’s Course, available online, to assist rural physicians in improving pre-hospital emergency medical care.
Hazardous Materials Emergency Preparedness (HMEP) Grants Program: Administered by PHMSA, HMEP grants help rural communities respond to hazardous material emergencies. The $28 million grant program will:
V. Outreach and Partnerships
Training and Technical Support: FHWA has developed and continues to offer a number of courses directly related to rural roadway safety, including : Roadway Safety Fundamentals, Rural Road Safety Audits, Low Cost Safety Countermeasures and Common Sense Intersection Solutions. Additional training packages on intersection without signals and other low-cost safety solutions are currently under development.
FHWA is making available safety guidance and technical documents to targeted rural owners, including specialized guidance on low-cost safety fixes for dangerously-curved roads, incorporating safety into resurfacing projects, proper maintenance of water run-off safety features, and guardrail repair and safety upkeep. FHWA also provides extensive guidance and technical support for the installation of should and centerline rumble strips, a specific, low-cost infrastructure solution that is particularly relevant for rural roads.
Crash Reduction Factors Report: This year, FHWA will hold workshops and conduct other outreach on its new Crash Reduction Factors report. A web-based version of the workshop is being considered to more widely expand delivery to rural areas. The report provides a comprehensive guide to help local road owners and operators pick infrastructure upgrades that can best improve safety. FHWA compiled a set of crash reduction factors based on a broad range of infrastructure countermeasures, to assist roadway owners in making appropriate selections of safety treatments.
Safety Information Clearinghouse: FHWA is currently upgrading the National Work Zone (WZ) Safety Information Clearinghouse (www.workzonesafety.org) which includes significant information specific to rural needs in work zones. The website includes work zone related crash data, laws and regulations, guidance, outreach material, safety products, research results, and training courses.
Policy Guide for Rural Road Safety: FHWA is developing guidance for state and local policy makers on programs and investments that generate the most effective safety improvements on rural roads to accelerate the deployment of safety improvements and reduce fatalities, injuries, and crashes on rural roads. The guidance will include specific policy level suggestions and consider the 4E’s (engineering, enforcement, education, and emergency response), and political considerations (such as the role of road safety in public health, quality of life, and budgeting). The guidance will describe specific Federal aid programs, funding sources, resources, and partners where appropriate.
Rural Commercial Vehicle Enforcement: FMCSA is beginning a project with the American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA) to convene a working group to research and analyze existing training opportunities and identify effective methodologies for delivering training on commercial vehicle safety strategies to local law enforcement agencies.
High School Rural Safety Message Competition: NHTSA will conduct a community competition to develop teen traffic safety messages and associated local activities beginning in September 2008. This competition will be designed to educate youth about the dangers on rural roads.
Assist Law Enforcement: In FY 2009, NHTSA, in conjunction with major law enforcement organizations, will implement a rural/suburban enforcement initiative focused on combining alcohol, belt and speed strategies through law enforcement leadership and incentives. This new initiative is intended to develop programs that will significantly increase routine law enforcement activity at the community level, and in rural areas.
FATALITIES IN MOTOR VEHICLE TRAFFIC CRASHES
OCCURRING IN RURAL AREAS
5-YEAR AVERAGE FOR 2002 TO 2006
RURAL VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (VMT), AND FATALITY RATES PER 100 MILLION RURAL VMT, BY STATE {SORTED BY FATALITY RATE}
Rank/State |
Rural VMT (Millions) |
Fatalities in Rural |
Fatality Rate per |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
Florida |
41,372 |
1,466 |
3.54 |
2 |
Arizona |
17,869 |
597 |
3.34 |
3 |
South Carolina |
28,515 |
912 |
3.20 |
4 |
Mississippi |
24,442 |
747 |
3.06 |
5 |
Nevada |
5,542 |
158 |
2.85 |
6 |
Montana |
8,445 |
232 |
2.75 |
7 |
Louisiana |
21,731 |
588 |
2.71 |
8 |
Missouri |
31,069 |
840 |
2.70 |
9 |
Kentucky |
27,187 |
721 |
2.65 |
10 |
California |
63,977 |
1,678 |
2.62 |
11 |
South Dakota |
6,550 |
171 |
2.60 |
12 |
North Carolina |
43,229 |
1,124 |
2.60 |
13 |
Arkansas |
19,809 |
513 |
2.59 |
14 |
Delaware |
3,178 |
82 |
2.57 |
15 |
Utah |
8,161 |
209 |
2.56 |
16 |
New Mexico |
13,743 |
351 |
2.55 |
17 |
Texas |
81,418 |
2,064 |
2.53 |
18 |
Alabama |
29,671 |
747 |
2.52 |
19 |
Idaho |
8,950 |
218 |
2.44 |
20 |
Kansas |
14,793 |
360 |
2.43 |
21 |
Oklahoma |
22,658 |
551 |
2.43 |
22 |
Tennessee |
29,896 |
709 |
2.37 |
23 |
West Virginia |
13,907 |
329 |
2.37 |
24 |
Colorado |
15,314 |
361 |
2.36 |
25 |
Washington |
16,873 |
384 |
2.27 |
26 |
Wyoming |
6,654 |
148 |
2.23 |
27 |
Alaska |
2,463 |
54 |
2.21 |
28 |
Pennsylvania |
40,852 |
880 |
2.15 |
29 |
Hawaii |
2,619 |
56 |
2.15 |
30 |
Ohio |
38,374 |
810 |
2.11 |
31 |
Oregon |
16,760 |
348 |
2.08 |
32 |
Michigan |
33,167 |
678 |
2.04 |
33 |
Nebraska |
11,434 |
223 |
1.95 |
34 |
Wisconsin |
29,375 |
561 |
1.91 |
35 |
Illinois |
30,668 |
576 |
1.88 |
36 |
Georgia |
45,561 |
851 |
1.87 |
37 |
Maryland |
14,727 |
268 |
1.82 |
38 |
Virginia |
31,342 |
567 |
1.81 |
39 |
Iowa |
19,124 |
337 |
1.76 |
40 |
North Dakota |
5,561 |
94 |
1.70 |
41 |
New York |
36,769 |
602 |
1.64 |
42 |
Maine |
10,951 |
179 |
1.64 |
43 |
Rhode Island |
900 |
15 |
1.62 |
44 |
Indiana |
36,997 |
587 |
1.59 |
45 |
Minnesota |
27,223 |
420 |
1.54 |
46 |
New Jersey |
8,475 |
130 |
1.53 |
47 |
New Hampshire |
6,679 |
101 |
1.52 |
48 |
Connecticut |
3,934 |
57 |
1.44 |
49 |
Massachusetts |
5,177 |
66 |
1.28 |
50 |
Vermont |
5,923 |
72 |
1.21 |
. |
National |
1,070,010 |
24,792 |
2.32 |
Puerto Rico |
2,003 |
238 |
11.87 |
The fatality rate and total number of rural deaths by state can be found at the end of this document.
Last updated: 2/29/2008