(ORDER LIST: 521 U.S.) (ORDER LIST: 521 U.S.) FRIDAY, JUNE 27, 1997 FRIDAY, JUNE 27, 1997 APPEALS -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION APPEALS -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION 96-595 RENO, ATTY. GEN. V. SHEA, JOE 96-1779 ) MEADOWS, M. BRUCE, ET AL. V. MOON, DONALD, ET AL. ) 96-1918 ) HARRIS, CURTIS, ET AL. V. MOON, DONALD, ET AL. The judgments are affirmed. CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION 95-1879 DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE V. CAL-ALMOND, INC., ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Glickman v. Wileman ________ _______ Brothers & Elliott, Inc., 521 U. S. _____ (1997). ________________________________________ 95-2006 FRANK, SHERIFF, ORANGE CTY. V. UNITED STATES The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of Printz v. United ______ ______ States, 521 U. S. _____ (1997). ______________________ 96-323 K.R., ET AL. V. ANDERSON COM. SCH. CORP. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997. 96-437 CHRISTIANS, JULIA, ETC. V. CRYSTAL EVANGELICAL CHURCH 1 The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the 2 United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of City of Boerne v. ______________ Flores, 521 U. S. _____ (1997). ______ 96-710 SULLIVAN, MICHAEL, ET AL. V. SASNETT, SYLVESTER, ET AL. The motion of respondents for leave to proceed in __ forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of ______________________________ certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U. S. _____ ______________ ______ (1997). 96-776 WATERVLIET BD. OF ED. V. RUSSMAN, COLLEEN The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit for further consideration in light of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997. 96-1267 ABRAMS, SYLVESTER V. BARNETT, WARDEN The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit for further consideration in light of Lindh v. Murphy, _____ _______ 521 U. S. _____ (1997). 96-1379 ) FLANAGAN, JAMES, ET AL. V. AHEARN, GERALD, ET AL. ) 96-1394 ) ORTIZ, ESTEBAN, ET AL. V. FIBREBOARD CORP., ET AL. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Amchem Products, Inc. ____________________ 3 v. Windsor, 521 U. S. _____ (1997). _______ 96-1633 ) SEDGWICK UNIFIED SCH. DIST. V. FOWLER, JAY, ET UX., ETC. ) 4 96-1865 ) FOWLER, JAY, ET UX., ETC. V. SEDGWICK UNIFIED SCH. DIST. The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the cases are remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for further consideration in light of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997. 96-8014 FRETWELL, BOBBY R. V. NORRIS, DIR., AR DOC The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in __ forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari ______________________________ are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U. S. _____ (1997). _____ ______ 96-8170 MOORE, BOBBY J. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in __ forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari ______________________________ are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of Lindh v. Murphy, 521 U. S. _____ (1997). _____ ______ ORDERS IN PENDING CASES ORDERS IN PENDING CASES M-87 MARIO RIVERA-ROBLES V. UNITED STATES The motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of certiorari under seal with redacted copies for the public record is granted. M-89 JAMES M. LYLE, IV vs. PHILLIP W. JARRELL, ET AL. M-90 MACK HARVEY COLEMAN V. RODNEY TAYLOR M-91 NORTH AMERICAN MARINE, INC., ET AL. V. PONTOON SHIPPING CO., LTD. (CYPRUS) 5 The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out-of-time are denied. 6 108, ORIG. NEBRASKA V. WYOMING, ET AL. The motion of the Special Master for compensation and reimbursement of expenses is granted, and the Special Master is awarded a total of $42,577.26 for the period November 16, 1996, through June 15, 1997, to be paid as follows: 30% by Nebraska, 30% by Wyoming, 15% by Colorado, and 25% by the United States. 120, ORIG. NEW JERSEY V. NEW YORK The motion of the Special Master for compensation and reimbursement of expenses is granted, and the Special Master is awarded a total of $263,488.89 to be paid equally by the parties. The motion of New York for leave to file Exceptions in excess of the page limitations is denied. The motion of the City of New York for leave to file a brief as amicus ______ curiae in excess of the page limitations is denied. ______ 95-1726 UNITED STATES V. LaBONTE, GEORGE, ET AL. The motion of respondent Stephen Dyer to modify the opinion is denied. 96-779 AR ED. TV COMMN. V. FORBES, RALPH The motion of the Acting Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae _____________ and for divided argument is granted to be divided as follows: petitioner - 25 minutes; respondent - 25 minutes; the Acting Solicitor General - 10 minutes. 96-871 STATE OIL CO. V. KHAN, BARKAT, ET AL. The motion of New York, et al. for leave to participate in oral argument as amici curiae and for ____________ divided argument is granted. 96-1742 BELSHE, KIMBERLY, ETC. V. ORTHOPAEDIC HOSP., ET AL. 7 The Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. 8 CERTIORARI GRANTED CERTIORARI GRANTED 96-1037 KIOWA TRIBE OF OK V. MFG. TECH., INC. 96-1613 UNITED STATES V. ESTATE OF FRANCIS ROMANI The petitions for writs of certiorari are granted. 96-679 PISCATAWAY BD. OF ED. V. TAXMAN, SHARON The motion of National School Boards Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. _____________ The motion of New Jersey School Boards Association for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The _____________ petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. 96-1395 KING, DIR., OPM V. ERICKSON, LESTER E., ET AL. The motion of respondent Jeanette Walsh for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition _________________ for a writ of certiorari is granted. 96-1578 PHILLIPS, THOMAS, ET AL. V. WASHINGTON LEGAL FDN., ET AL The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to Question 1 presented by the petition. 96-1769 OH ADULT PAROLE AUTH., ET AL V. WOODARD, EUGENE The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in __ forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of ______________________________ certiorari is granted. CERTIORARI DENIED CERTIORARI DENIED 95-2052 ) UNITED STATES V. GONZALEZ, SHERIFF, ET AL. ) 95-2077 ) GONZALEZ, SHERIFF, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 95-8131 SCHMIDT, WILLIAM V. WISCONSIN 95-8204 POST, SAMUEL, ET AL. V. WISCONSIN 9 95-9308 MARBERRY, WILLIAM E. V. WISCONSIN 96-577 TRISTAR CORPORATION V. FREITAS, ROSS, ET AL. 10 96-628 KEANE, SUPT., SING SING V. BORIA, OSCAR 96-823 KANSAS V. MYERS, KYM 96-1059 SYCUAN BAND/MISSION INDIANS V. WILSON, GOV. OF CA, ET AL. 96-1326 HANDICABS, INC. V. NLRB 96-1392 FINK, CHRISTOPHER V. RYAN, SEC. OF ST. OF IL 96-1447 UN. BHD. CARPENTERS, ETC. V. BE&K CONSTR. CO., ET AL. 96-1491 CUSIMANO, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES 96-1538 ) TOLAND, JOHN, ET UX., ETC. V. PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, ET AL. ) 96-1731 ) BISHOFERGER, LESLIE, ET UX. V. PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, INC. ) 96-1732 ) JACKSON, McDANIEL, ET UX. V. PRUDENTIAL SECURITIES, INC. 96-1539 LOON MOUNTAIN REC. CORP. V. DUBOIS, ROLAND, ET AL. 96-1542 FEDERATION FOR AM. IMMIG. V. RENO, ATTY. GEN., ET AL. 96-1571 KARE 11, ETC., ET AL. V. RYTHER, C. THOMAS 96-1574 PANTANI, TERESA, ET VIR V. RICHARDSON, CIR, ET AL. 96-1639 DEMPSTER, KAREN V. ANCHORAGE, AK, ET AL. 96-1651 WCC ASSOCIATES, ET AL. V. HI CARPENTERS TRUST FUNDS 96-1657 MULLINS, SILAS V. MANNING COAL CORP., ET AL. 96-1687 ISENBERGH, PAUL, ET AL. V. KNIGHT-RIDDER NEWSPAPER 96-1696 DAGI, LINDA V. CHRIS MOTORS CORP., ET AL. 96-1698 INSTITUT PASTEUR, ET AL. V. CAMBRIDGE BIOTECH CORP. 96-1701 VERNON, C. D., ETC. V. HARTER, WAYNE, ET AL. 96-1708 HOLT, VERONICE V. MITCHELL, JUDGE, CIR. CT. FL 96-1709 HOLT, VERONICE V. LEE, ARVIE 96-1710 U. S. FIRE INS. CO., ET AL. V. ASBESTOS CLAIMS MGMT. CORP. 96-1714 ELLIOTT, DOROTHY, ET VIR V. LEAVITT, JASON, ET AL. 96-1718 HOMEBUILDERS ASSN., ET AL. V. SCOTTSDALE, AZ, ET AL. 96-1722 RFE INDUSTRIES, INC. V. SPM CORP. 96-1726 AM. INVESTORS LIFE INS. CO. V. HUDSON, PATRICIA 96-1729 KNISKERN, JAMES, ET AL. V. SOMERFORD, OH, ET AL. 11 96-1734 ARIZONA V. PALENKAS, EDWARD 96-1735 TEXAS V. MOWBRAY, FREDA, ETC. 12 96-1737 SWANSON, GORDANA V. KNABE, DON 96-1744 GONZALEZ, BLANCA, ET AL. V. GALLO, JOAN E. 96-1745 ENERCON INDUSTRIES, ET AL. V. PILLAR CORP., ET AL. 96-1748 JOHNSON, HAROLD D. V. GREATER SE COMMUNITY HOSP. 96-1750 MEDICO, CAROLEE A. V. MEDICO, CHARLES, ET AL. 96-1752 NEW PORT LARGO, INC. V. MONROE COUNTY, FL 96-1756 ) McMILLIAN, WALTER V. TATE, THOMAS, ET AL. ) 96-1765 ) TATE, THOMAS V. McMILLIAN, WALTER 96-1766 WASHINGTON LEGAL FND., ET AL V. TX EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE 96-1778 ABRAMS, ELLIOTT V. OFFICE OF BAR COUNSELFOR DC 96-1780 MEMBERS OF DISCIP. BD., NM V. REVO, M. TERRENCE 96-1781 STEVENS, IRVING, ET UX. V. CANNON BEACH, OR 96-1817 TAYLOR, DERRICK V. CONNECTICUT 96-1834 AGENCY RENT-A-CAR, INC. V. HALL, LOUISE 96-1842 RUSH, WILLIAM M. V. TEXAS 96-1846 NEWMAN, LAWRENCE, ET UX. V. WORCESTER CTY. SOC. SVS. 96-1850 REYNOLDS, WARDEN, ET AL. V. BROWN, DAVID 96-1859 DIANA, MICHAEL V. FLORIDA 96-1868 GOLDTOOTH, JOHNNY V. MSPB 96-1876 EHRLANDER, LARS V. DEPT. OF TRANS., AK, ET AL. 96-1903 ABBEY, KATHLEEN V. SVERDRUP CORP., ET AL. 96-1922 GREAT PLAINS CHEM. CO. V. MICRO CHEM., INC. 96-1931 SALERNO, ROBERT V. UNITED STATES 96-5609 CHRISTY, CARL R. V. MAGNUSON, JOHN, ET AL. 96-7662 ANDERSON, ROBERT JAMES V. TEXAS 96-7758 FIERRO, CESAR R. V. TEXAS 96-8280 WILLIS, ROBERT L. V. UNITED STATES 96-8380 UNTERBURGER, RAYMOND, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 96-8405 VASQUEZ, VICTOR V. OPM, ET AL. 13 96-8413 MURDOCH, DAVID J. V. UNITED STATES 96-8499 CARDAN, CYRUS V. NYX, TIM, ET AL. 14 96-8577 LOCKHART, MICHAEL L. V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ 96-8672 MATHENIA, CHUCK L. V. BOWERSOX, SUPT., POTOSI 96-8755 GIBSON, WARREN A. V. MASSACHUSETTS 96-8767 BARQUERO, AMILCAR V. MEDRANO, TOM R. 96-8773 AMERSON, ROBERT ANDREW V. IDAHO 96-8774 BOWLES, EDDIE J. V. DR. WALDEN, ET AL. 96-8797 STOBAUGH, DAVID V. WOOD, SUPT. 96-8803 GRANT, SONIA V. IN REM RELEASE BOARD, ET AL. 96-8804 GODETT, DEREK V. GAITHER, WARDEN 96-8805 THOMAS, MICHAEL J. V. CALIFORNIA 96-8811 McGEE, DWAYNE A. V. SINGLETARY, SEC., FL DOC 96-8814 MOYA, VICTOR R. V. EYHERBIDE, DOMONIC, ET AL. 96-8817 LOYER, STEVEN T. V. LOYER, BERNARD J., ET AL. 96-8819 JOHNSON, WILLARD B. V. OKLAHOMA 96-8832 ASSA'AD-FALTAS, MARIE V. ROGERS, DAVID H. 96-8833 COOLIDGE, LEROY V. BLOCK DRUG, INC. 96-8834 SETCHELL, SHELLY D. V. LITTLE SIX, INC. 96-8835 BROWN, JOHN WAYNE V. NETHERLAND, WARDEN 96-8839 BOND, CHARLES P. V. NORTH CAROLINA 96-8840 WASHINGTON, ALVIN V. OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DIST. 96-8841 CADEJUSTE, DIEUNIOUS V. WELCH, WARDEN, ET AL. 96-8843 DiCESARE, JOSEPH A. V. COWLEY, WARDEN, ET AL. 96-8848 BATES, JAMES V. NEW JERSEY 96-8852 CURTIS, MEMWALDY V. FLORIDA 96-8854 VISCIOTTI, JOHN L. V. CALIFORNIA 96-8856 ELEY, JOHN J. V. OHIO 96-8872 SMITH, RODERICK L. V. OKLAHOMA 96-8880 KOVACIK, ROBERT J. V. HACKEL, WILLIAM H., ET AL. 96-8881 MARR, FLOYD W. V. WRIGHT, SUPT., CLALLAM BAY 15 96-8884 LACHICA, RUBY D. V. MED. COLLEGE OF WI, ET AL. 96-8886 BELL, ELDON GUY V. HUNT, GOV. OF NC, ET AL. 16 96-8890 RODRIGUEZ, ESEQUIEL V. TEXAS 96-8896 FABIAN, RICHARD V. METRO. DADE COUNTY, ET AL. 96-8923 BLAISDELL, RICHARD V. PENAROSA, ACTING WARDEN 96-8938 PETERSON, DAVID S. V. SHANKS, WARDEN 96-8939 BARBARY, JESUS V. STURM, JAMES R., ET AL. 96-8941 SINGH, GOKARAN V. COMMR. OF SOC. SERV. 96-8956 OWENS, BESTY JOHN V. ARIZONA 96-8959 LONGFELLOW, JOHN W. V. DELAWARE 96-9015 WALKER, JACK D. V. OKLAHOMA 96-9020 WHYTE, DORREL V. NEW YORK 96-9036 GREER, WILLIAM L. V. PARKE, SUPT. 96-9049 ARTEAGA, RAUL V. TX DEPT. OF PROTECTIVE SERV. 96-9067 BAIR, GORDON E. V. BROWN, SEC. OF VA 96-9069 SIMON, ROBERT V. MISSISSIPPI 96-9092 THOMAS, TROY V. UNITED STATES 96-9094 SCHWARZ, BARBARA V. MSPB 96-9103 DORLOUIS, PHILIPPE, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES 96-9114 LAUTI, AUA V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ 96-9122 ARROYO, HECTOR LUIS V. UNITED STATES 96-9127 RUSSELL, LESLIE V. UNITED STATES 96-9128 SCHWEITZER, LEO F. V. UNITED STATES 96-9130 MARTINEZ, RUBEN V. SLATER, SEC. OF TRANS. 96-9132 ISENBERG, LEWIS E. V. UNITED STATES 96-9133 RIES, DAVID LEE V. UNITED STATES 96-9134 OLIVARES-SEVILLA, MARTIN V. UNITED STATES 96-9137 BANNISTER, ALAN J. V. BOWERSOX, SUPT., POTOSI 96-9145 BRAMSON, LEONARD A. V. UNITED STATES 96-9149 McDONALD, SAMUEL L. V. BOWERSOX, SUPT., POTOSI 96-9150 NAGIB, KAREEM A. V. UNITED STATES 17 96-9151 MEDINA-ALFONSO, PASCUAL V. UNITED STATES 96-9159 AUSTIN, DENNIS V. LUCHT, WARDEN, ET AL. 18 96-9162 JENNINGS, BRYANT C. V. UNITED STATES 96-9164 JONES, KATHLEEN K. V. UNITED STATES 96-9165 HAUT, AGATHA R. V. UNITED STATES 96-9168 HATHCOCK, GREGORY W. V. UNITED STATES 96-9171 FERNANDEZ-ROQUE, CARLOS M. V. UNITED STATES 96-9172 HAUT, STEPHEN V. UNITED STATES 96-9173 HAMILTON, CHRISTOPHER V. UNITED STATES 96-9174 DRAVES, FREDERICK L. V. UNITED STATES 96-9175 COLLINS, JOHN L. V. FHA-USDA, ET AL. 96-9179 SCROGGINS, GREGORY V. UNITED STATES 96-9181 MERRICK, ANTHONY V. UNITED STATES 96-9185 STARNES, MICHON V. UNITED STATES 96-9186 POLANCO, LUIS V. UNITED STATES 96-9189 BOYLESS, AARON JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES 96-9193 WARE, ALLEN V. UNITED STATES 96-9199 SCOTT, GREGORY V. UNITED STATES 96-9205 BINFORD, SHAWN L. V. UNITED STATES 96-9206 BECKER, BRADLEY W. V. UNITED STATES 96-9207 SANFORD, STEVEN LANG V. UNITED STATES 96-9208 SATZ, MICHAEL ERIC V. UNITED STATES 96-9209 OWENS, WILBERT V. UNITED STATES 96-9212 STEWART, DERRICK LAMONT V. UNITED STATES 96-9213 ROGERS, MOSES V. UNITED STATES 96-9222 EDMONSON, MITCHEAL V. UNITED STATES 96-9225 EVERETT, STEVEN L. V. UNITED STATES 96-9237 TINSLEY, SCOTT L. V. UNITED STATES 96-9239 WILLIAMS, MARGARET, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied. 96-31 SMITH, EVELYN V. FAIR EMPLOYMENT, ETC., ET AL 19 The motion of American Jewish Congress, et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae is granted. The ____________ 20 motion of Defenders of Property Rights for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a _____________ writ of certiorari is denied. 96-174 ACORN, ET AL. V. FOSTER, GOV. OF LA, ET AL. The motion of Public Citizen for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a _____________ writ of certiorari is denied. 96-1231 E. I. DU PONT DE NEMOURS V. SHERIDAN, BARBARA The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. 96-1591 CALDERON, WARDEN V. SILVA, BENJAMIN The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in __ forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of ______________________________ certiorari is denied. 96-1719 GALLO, MATTHEW, ET AL. V. AMOCO CORP., ET AL. The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. 96-1755 CALDERON, WARDEN V. USDC FOR ED CA, ETC. The motion of Criminal Justice Legal Foundation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The _____________ motion of respondent Blufford Hayes, Jr., for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a _________________ writ of certiorari is denied. HABEAS CORPUS DENIED HABEAS CORPUS DENIED 21 96-9220 IN RE RICKEY HUGHEY 96-9235 IN RE ALFRED STONE 22 96-9255 IN RE ARTHUR A. BLUMEYER, III The petitions for writs of habeas corpus are denied. MANDAMUS DENIED MANDAMUS DENIED 96-8947 IN RE ROBERT A. CARNEY AND RUTH AXTELL The petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. REHEARINGS DENIED REHEARINGS DENIED 96-1160 RICHARDSON, ROBERT V. ALBERTSON'S, INC. 96-1390 EVANS, MARIE, ETC. V. AVERY, TERRACE, ET AL. 96-1399 U. S., EX REL. HAYCOCK V. HUGHES AIRCRAFT CO. 96-7555 SIDLES, BRAD V. LEWIS, SAMUEL, ET AL. 96-7565 WILLIAMS, LARRY R., ET UX. V. UNITED STATES, ET AL. 96-7849 HARRIS, CLYDE L. V. CUYAHOGA COUNTY, OH, ET AL. 96-8015 GOLDEN, WILLIAM D. V. TEXAS 96-8046 McREYNOLDS, WILBUR V. VENKATARAGHAVEN, USHA 96-8175 HENRY, LORRAINE D. V. WILLIAMSON, JOHN K., ET AL. 96-8265 TAYLOR, EARL V. JOHNSON, DIR., TX DCJ 96-8273 SISK, STEVEN V. TEXAS 96-8604 PARKER, CHARLES V. UNITED STATES The petitions for rehearing are denied. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE D-1798 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOSEPH DOMINIC SLOBODA Joseph Dominic Sloboda, of Miami Beach, Florida, having been suspended from the practice of law in this Court by order of April 21, 1997; and a rule having been issued requiring him to show cause why he should not be 23 disbarred; It is ordered that Joseph Dominic Sloboda is 24 disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1817 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF KENNETH MACK WILLIAMS Kenneth Mack Williams, of Glen Burnie, Maryland, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. D-1818 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF ROBERT S. SOSNAY Robert S. Sosnay, of Wauwatosa, Wisconsin, is suspended from the practice of law in this Court and a rule will issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court. RECESS ORDER RECESS ORDER The Court will take a recess from today until the first Monday in October 1997, at which time the October 1996 Term will adjourn. 25