![[logo] US EPA](https://webarchive.library.unt.edu/eot2008/20090509085010im_/http://www.epa.gov/epafiles/images/logo_epaseal.gif){kind=logo}
Conformity Adequacy Review - Region 8
Transportation
Conformity
- Main Transportation Conformity Page
- General Information
- Policy Guidance
- Training Materials
- Regulations
- Adequacy Review of SIP Submissions
- Regional Contacts
NOTE: You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader, available as a free download, to view some of the files on this page. See EPA's PDF page to learn more about PDF, and for a link to the free Acrobat Reader.
SIP Submissions that EPA has Found Adequate or Inadequate
Region 8: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming
For more information about adequacy review, return to the main adequacy page.
Contact: Kerri Fiedler at 303-312-6493, fax: 303-312-6064 or fiedler.kerri@epa.gov or
Tim Russ at 303-312-6479, fax: 303-312-6064 or russ.tim@epa.gov.
U.S. EPA Region 8, 1595 Wynkoop St., Denver, Colorado 80202.
| Colorado | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Aspen | PM10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (09/04/02) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 90K) FR Notice | PDF version (2 pp, 34K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Canon City | PM10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (07/31/00) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. |
| Colorado Springs | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan 1998-2009 budgets | Inadequate (04/29/99) |
Determination made under old process |
| maintenace plan 2010 budget and beyond | Adequate (04/29/99) |
Determination made under old process | ||
| Denver | PM10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (06/28/07) Letter (PDF) ( 5 pp, 26K) FR Notice | PDF version (2 pp, 89K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Adequate (10/29/01) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 90K) FR Notice | PDF version (1 pp,35K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |||
| carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (06/28/07) Letter (PDF) (5 pp, 155K) FR Notice | PDF version (2 pp, 89K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| Adequate (08/18/00) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 81K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |||
| 1-hour ozone | maintenance plan | Adequate (09/11/01) FR Notice | PDF version (8 pp, 69K) |
Budgets found adequate through SIP approval process. | |
| Inadequate (07/24/00) Letter (PDF) (3 pp, 91K) FR Notice |
||||
| Greeley | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (01/20/04) Letter (PDF) 2 pp, 90K) FR Notice | PDF version (2 pp, 3K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Fort Collins | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (02/19/03) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 26K) FR Notice | PDF version (2 pp, 3K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Lamar | PM10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (11/12/02) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 107K) FR Notice | PDF version (2 pp, 39K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Longmont | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (06/28/07) Letter (PDF) (5 pp, 152K) FR Notice | PDF version (2 pp, 89K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Inadequate (05/14/99) |
Determination made under old process | |||
| Pagosa Springs | PM10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (08/18/00) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 81K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Steamboat Springs | PM10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (11/12/02) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 107K) FR Notice | PDF version (2 pp, 39K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Telluride | PM10 | maintenance plan | Adequate (08/18/00) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 81K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Montana | ||||
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Missoula | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (06/16/06) Letter (PDF) (1 pp, 326K) FR Notice (PDF) (2 pp, 78K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| Utah | ||||
| Area | Pollutant | SIP Submission |
Finding (date budgets apply) |
Additional Information/ Comments |
| Ogden | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate
(06/10/05)
Letter (PDF) (4 pp, 286K) FR Notice (PDF) (2 pp, 57K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate (04/29/99) |
Determination made under old process | |
| Provo (Utah County) | carbon monoxide | attainment demonstration | Adequate (08/04/04) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 88K) FR Notice (PDF) (1 pp, 46K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |
| PM10 | attainment demonstration (2010 & 2020 budgets) | Adequate (10/16/02) Letter (PDF) (2 pp, 101K) FR Notice |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. | |
| carbon monoxide | attainment demonstration | Inadequate (05/14/99) |
Determination made under old process | |
| Salt Lake City Area | carbon monoxide | maintenance plan | Adequate
(06/15/05)
Letter (PDF) (4 pp, 286K) FR Notice (PDF) (1 pp, 51K) |
Budgets found adequate through the adequacy review process. |