USGS Home
SOFIA Home

Flow Data (Levesque)

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently-anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title: Flow Data (Levesque)
Abstract:
In 1996, the U.S. Geological Survey began a 4-year study of the flow and nutrient characteristics of three major streams that drain parts of the Everglades National Park. An upward looking acoustic Doppler current profiler, a water-level sensor, and two specific conductance sensors were installed at each site. Monthly discharge measurements are made with an acoustic Doppler current profiler to develop discharge ratings. Nutrient data are collected monthly at each site.

Data collected at the Broad River, Harney River, and Shark River stations include water level, water velocity, specific conductance and temperature, total and dissolved phosphorus species, pH, and dissolved oxygen. These three stations were established in 1997.

Supplemental_Information:
This project is now part of the Tides and Inflows in the Mangrove Ecotone (TIME) Model Development project.
  1. How should this data set be cited?

    Levesque, Victor A. , 2005, Flow Data (Levesque).

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -81.25
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -81
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 25.5
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 25.33

  3. What does it look like?

    <http://sofia.usgs.gov/exchange/levesque/locationflow.html> (GIF)
    flow data location map

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Beginning_Date: Oct-1996
    Ending_Date: 1998
    Currentness_Reference: ground condition

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: text files

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

      Indirect_Spatial_Reference: southwest coast of Everglades National Park

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

      Horizontal positions are specified in geographic coordinates, that is, latitude and longitude. Latitudes are given to the nearest 1. Longitudes are given to the nearest 1. Latitude and longitude values are specified in Degrees, minutes, and decimal seconds.

      The horizontal datum used is North American Datum of 1983.
      The ellipsoid used is Geodetic Reference System 80.
      The semi-major axis of the ellipsoid used is 6378137.
      The flattening of the ellipsoid used is 1/298.257.

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

    Entity_and_Attribute_Overview:
    Data collected for the Broad River, Harney River, and Shark River sites include: stage, velocity, discharge, specific conductance (top and bottom), and water temperature (top and bottom).
    Entity_and_Attribute_Detail_Citation: USGS personnel


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    Project personnel included Paul Boetcher, Tim O'Hare, Kathi Hammett, and Yvonne Stoker

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Victor A. Levesque
    U.S. Geological Survey
    The University Center for Business

    10500 University Center Drive, Suite 215
    Tampa, FL 33612-6427
    USA

    813 975-8620 x167 (voice)
    813 975-0839 (FAX)
    levesque@usgs.gov


Why was the data set created?

The southwest coast of Florida is part of a wilderness area with unique hydraulic characteristics that has historically been described as the "River of Grass". Flat terrain and lack of controlled topographic information has made it difficult to define drainage divides. Low gradients, coupled with tidal effects, create complex conditions under which to measure river flow. It has been almost thirty years since any effort has been made to monitor flow characteristics continuously in the area. Significant technological advancements have occurred during this time and this new technology can be applied to help obtain the information needed to make informed decisions about the future of this unique coastal area.

Flow, nutrient concentrations, and nutrient load data will provide part of the basic information needed to understand the hydrologic and water-quality characteristics for a part of the southwest coast of Florida. The analysis of these measurements will help characterize the current conditions for the three sites and explain the relation between upgradient water levels and southwest coastal stream flows, and the possible interaction between southwest coastal waters and the waters of Florida Bay. The data can also be used as input to hydrodynamic and water-quality models.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: 1999 (process 1 of 1)
    The Broad, Harney, and Shark River monitoring station locations were selected based on an initial reconnaissance of the study area in June 1996 that included bathymetry, hydrodynamic characteristics, and water-quality. Aerial photography also was used to locate the monitoring stations. These three stations were established between November 1996 and January 1997. A second field reconnaissance conducted in December 1997, and a meeting with ENP personnel in October 1998, were used to locate two additional discharge and nutrient flux monitoring stations. Station installations at Lostmans Creek and North River were completed in April 1999.

    Continuous monitoring of water-level, stream velocity, and specific conductance combined with periodic discharge measurements and collection of water-quality samples were required to compute the discharge and nutrient flux from the five estuarine river stations. Stream velocity (index-velocity) data were used to estimate the mean cross-section channel velocity (mean velocity) that was measured using a vessel-mounted acoustic Doppler discharge measurement system. Stream velocity data were used with the measured mean channel velocity to develop index-to-mean velocity relations. Each station was equipped with similar instrumentation. Data collected at each station were reviewed for accuracy and entered into the USGS NWIS database. Data for each station were then used to develop regression equations that were used to estimate water discharge and nutrient flux.

    Water-Level and Velocity Measurements Water level was measured at each station using Design Analysis Associates H-310 vented-submersible pressure sensors that were mounted within 2-in. inside-diameter polyvinylchloride (PVC) pipes with end caps, which functioned as stilling wells. Quarter-inch holes were drilled around the perimeter of the PVC pipe within 6 in. of the bottom. Pressure sensors were programmed to average over an 8-second period every 15 minutes. Distances to water-level surfaces were measured from fixed reference points every 4 to 6 weeks and compared to the water levels measured by the pressure transducers. Water-surface reference measurements varied less than 0.02 ft from the pressure transducer water levels during the study.

    Two types of vertically oriented acoustic Doppler velocity systems were used to measure 2-min averages of velocity through the water column every 15 minutes:

    (1) SonTek ADP 1.5 and 3 MHz velocity profilers, and (2) SonTek Argonaut-XR 3 MHz depth-averaging velocity sensors.

    Vertically oriented velocity profilers were used because vertical stratification of flow was possible, and because these sensors allow variations in the velocity profiles in the water column to be measured during all conditions. One drawback to using a vertically oriented index-velocity system is the limited amount of across-channel volume that is measured. In rivers and streams with variable cross-channel flow distribution, this could prove to be a problem. If water flow is relatively uniform and flow patterns are always the same across the channel, vertically oriented sensors can provide an alternative to horizontally oriented index-velocity systems.

    Discharge Measurements River discharge was measured directly using a vessel-mounted acoustic discharge system (Simpson and Oltmann, 1992). An RD Instruments 1.2 MHz acoustic Doppler discharge measurement system was used to measure discharge for calibration and validation of the index-to-mean velocity relation at all stations every 4 to 6 weeks. The discharge section edges were marked with buoys and unmeasured edge section distances were measured using optical and laser range finders. Discharge values were calculated using manufacturer's software. Individual discharge measurements took between 4 to 10 minutes to complete.

    Discharge measurements were collected over varying ranges of tidal level and tidal phase for about one year to develop an index-to-mean velocity relation for each station. Multiple measurements were made during 3- to 6-hour periods to better characterize variations in flow caused by variations in tide, inflow, and wind effects, and to reduce serial correlations between measurement sets. Discharge data collected after the calibration period were used to check the accuracy of the water-level/velocity/discharge relations for the duration of the study and to apply corrections or shifts to the index-to-mean velocity relations if required. Corrections to the velocity regressions were not required at four of the five stations during the study. The Harney River station index-velocity data were corrected for June 1998 because of an electronics problem that caused the index-velocity data to be biased low.

    Person who carried out this activity:

    Victor A. Levesque
    U.S. Geological Survey
    The University Center for Business

    10500 University Center Drive, Suite 215
    Tampa, FL 33612-6427
    USA

    813 975-8620 x167 (voice)
    813 975-0839 (FAX)
    levesque@usgs.gov

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?

    Fishman, M. J. Friedman, L. C., 1985, Methods for Determination of Inorganic Substances in Water and Fluvial Sediments Sediments: USGS Open-File Report OFR 85-495, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

    Other_Citation_Details:
    This report is no longer current and has been superseded by a more recent publication: USGS Report TWRI -05-A1: 1989
    Levesque, Victor A., 2004, Water Flow and Nutrient Flux from Five Estuarine Rivers along the Southwest Coast of the Everglades National Park: USGS Scientific Investigations Report 2004-5142, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

    Online Links:

    Stoker, Y. E. Levesque, V. A.; Fritz, E. , 1996, Discharge, water-quality characteristics, and nutrient loads from McKay Bay, Delaney Creek, and East Bay, Tampa, Florida, 1991-1993: USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 95-4167, U.S. Geological Survey, Tallahassee, FL.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details:
    Prepared in cooperation with the Tampa Bay Regional Planning Council
    Stoker, Y. E. Levesque, V. A.; Woodham, W, 1996, The effect of discharge and water quality of the Alafia River, Hillsborough River, and the Tampa Bypass Canal on nutrient loading to Hillsborough Bay, Florida: USGS Water Resources Investigations Report 95-4107, U.S. Geological Survey, Tallahassee, FL.

    Online Links:

    U.S. Geologcial Survey, 1989, Methods for determination of inorganic substances in water and fluvial sediments: USGS Techniques of Water-Resource Investigation 05-A1, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, DC.

    Online Links:

    Other_Citation_Details: Fishman, M. J. And Friedman, L. C., eds


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

    The positional accuracy is 30 meters with the positions acquired using differential corrected GPS.

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    Flow data for all three sites are available for 1996, 1997, and 1998.

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    The same data for flow were collected at each site


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints: None
Use_Constraints: None

  1. Who distributes the data set? (Distributor 1 of 1)

    Heather S.Henkel
    U.S. Geological Survey
    600 Fourth St. South
    St. Petersburg, FL 33701
    USA

    727 803-8747 ext 3028 (voice)
    727 803-2030 (FAX)
    hhenkel@usgs.gov

  2. What's the catalog number I need to order this data set?

    Levesque flow data

  3. What legal disclaimers am I supposed to read?

    There are no explicit or implicit warrantees for the data.

  4. How can I download or order the data?


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 25-Apr-2007
Metadata author:
Heather Henkel
U.S. Geological Survey
600 Fourth Street South
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
USA

727 803-8747 ext 3028 (voice)
727 803-2030 (FAX)
sofia-metadata@usgs.gov

Metadata standard:
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata (FGDC-STD-001-1998)


This page is <http://sofia.usgs.gov/metadata/sflwww/levesque_flow.faq.html>

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, Center for Coastal Geology
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Generated by mp version 2.8.18 on Mon Apr 30 12:01:23 2007