Skip to text.To Contents     To Previous Page     To Sources     To Publications Page     To Home Page 


To Home Page. National Drug Intelligence Center
Marijuana and Methamphetamine Trafficking on Federal Lands Threat Assessment
February 2005

Methamphetamine

Production

Mexican criminal groups, who often operate high capacity superlabs, are the primary producers of methamphetamine in the Pacific and Southwest Regions; however, Caucasian independent producers also are active, typically operating low capacity laboratories capable of producing ounce quantities of methamphetamine.

Methamphetamine production on NFS lands in the Midwest, Northeast, Southeast, and Southwest Regions is limited but increasing. In 2003, USFS reported 17 methamphetamine laboratory seizures in those regions, up from 3 reported seizures in 2001.

Caucasian independent methamphetamine producers are predominant in the Midwest, Northeast, Southeast and West Regions, typically operating small, mobile, low capacity Birch laboratories.

Law enforcement reporting indicates that methamphetamine laboratories have been discovered on federal lands throughout the United States. Methamphetamine laboratories often are discovered in or near caves, cabins, recreational areas, abandoned mines, and private vehicles located on or adjacent to federal lands. Methamphetamine laboratories on federal lands vary in size from small, mobile, low capacity laboratories operated by independent producers to high capacity superlabs capable of producing 10 or more pounds of methamphetamine in a single production cycle. Often operated by organized criminal groups, superlabs produce large quantities for wholesale distribution.

Methamphetamine production methods used on federal lands vary regionally. In the Midwest, West, and Southeast Regions, Caucasian independent producers using the Birch reduction method are predominant. In the Pacific and Southwest Regions, Mexican criminal groups and, to a lesser extent, Caucasian independent producers using the hydriodic acid/red phosphorus method are most common.


Methamphetamine Production Methods

Ephedrine/Pseudoephedrine Reduction:

Hydriodic acid/red phosphorus: Often associated with Mexican DTOs, this method can yield multipound quantities of d-methamphetamine. The precursor chemicals used in this method of production include ephedrine or pseudoephedrine, hydriodic acid, and red phosphorus.

Birch (also called the Nazi method): Most often used by small-scale, independent methamphetamine producers, this method yields ounce quantities of d-methamphetamine. Precursor chemicals include ephedrine or pseudoephedrine, anhydrous ammonia, and sodium or lithium metal.

 

NFS Lands. There are no conclusive estimates regarding methamphetamine production on federal lands; however, anecdotal and law enforcement reporting indicate that despite decreasing numbers of reported methamphetamine laboratory seizures, methamphetamine production on federal lands is a growing threat. Seizure data from NFS and DOI reveal fluctuations in the number of reported methamphetamine laboratories seized on federal lands in recent years. In 2003, 56 reported methamphetamine laboratories were seized on NFS lands, while 83 were seized on DOI lands that year, compared with 187 and 41 laboratories seized on NFS and DOI lands, respectively, in 2002.

Figure 4. Top Five National Forests for Methamphetamine Laboratory Seizures, January 2002 to December 2003

Map of the U.S. showing the top five national forests for methamphetamine laboratory seizures from January 2002 to December 2003.
d-link

Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, National Forest System Drug Enforcement Report 2002 and 2002 Controlled Substance Enforcement Activity on National Forest System Lands.

DOI Lands. Methamphetamine production on DOI lands appears to be increasing. The number of reported methamphetamine laboratory seizures on DOI lands increased from 28 in 2001, to 41 in 2002, to 83 in 2003. In 2003, the greatest number of reported methamphetamine laboratory seizures on DOI lands occurred on lands managed by FWS (38 laboratories), followed by BLM (31 laboratories), NPS (8 laboratories), and BIA (6 laboratories).

To Top      To Contents

 

Transportation

Law enforcement reporting indicates that methamphetamine is transported from Mexico and, to a much lesser extent, Canada into the United States through federal lands; however, data regarding the total amount of methamphetamine seized on federal lands along the U.S.-Mexico and U.S.-Canada borders are not available. DOI reporting indicates that the amount of methamphetamine seized on DOI lands decreased from 464 pounds in 2001, to 244 pounds in 2002, to 206 pounds in 2003. Likewise, the total amount of methamphetamine seized on NFS lands decreased sharply from 114 pounds in 2002 to 22 pounds in 2003.

Figure 5. Methamphetamine Seizures, Department of the Interior Lands, 2003

Chart showing 206 pounds of methamphetamine and 83 methamphetamine laboratories seized on Department of the Interior lands in 2003.

Source: U.S. Department of the Interior.

Mexican DTOs and criminal groups as well as independent traffickers smuggle methamphetamine from Mexico into the United States through remote areas of federal lands between POEs along the Southwest Border. Methamphetamine smugglers use a variety of methods to smuggle methamphetamine from Mexico into the United States through federal lands, including couriers traveling on foot, on horse, and in personal vehicles. The DOI reports that methamphetamine smugglers who transport the drug in private vehicles occasionally cross the U.S.-Mexico border into federal lands on illegally established roads.

Canada is not considered a significant source of methamphetamine. Seizures of methamphetamine on federal lands along the Northern Border do not occur with any frequency, nor do they involve significant seizure amounts.

NFS Lands. Forest Service reporting indicates that Mexican DTOs and criminal groups smuggle methamphetamine into the United States through NFS lands in Arizona, the only state with NFS lands on the U.S.-Mexico border. Mexican DTOs transport methamphetamine from Mexico into the United States through remote areas of the Coronado National Monument primarily by couriers traveling on foot. Only one road runs through the extremely rough terrain in the Coronado National Monument, requiring law enforcement personnel to exit their vehicles and investigate or pursue smugglers on foot.

DOI Lands. In Southwest Arizona, couriers smuggle methamphetamine through the Cabeza Prieta Natural Wildlife Refuge, Organ Pipe Cactus National Monument, and Buenos Aires Natural Wildlife Refuge. DOI reporting indicates that DTOs place stockpiles of food and water along smuggling routes on federal lands. The rations are intended for couriers who smuggle methamphetamine and other drugs in backpacks or bags across the U.S.-Mexico border into Arizona. Couriers transport loads as far as 35 miles through the Arizona desert en route to stash sites along I-8 and State Routes 86 and 286.

 

Outlook

The number of methamphetamine laboratories seized on federal lands in the Midwest and Southeast Regions likely will increase in the near term. Forest Service data show that the number of reported methamphetamine laboratory seizures on NFS lands remained stable in the Midwest Region with 6 seizures each in 2001 and 2002 and 7 in 2003, but increased in the Southeast Region from 1 in 2001, to 11 in 2002, to 35 in 2003. Moreover, 2003 National Clandestine Laboratory Seizure System data reveal sharp increases in the number of reported methamphetamine laboratories seized in the Midwest and Southeast Regions between 2001 and 2003. The number of reported methamphetamine laboratories seized in the Midwest Region increased from 1,947 in 2001, to 2,540 in 2002, to 3,038 in 2003. In the Southeast Region, the reported number of methamphetamine laboratory seizures increased from 1,247 in 2001, to 1,906 in 2002, to 2,847 in 2003. The combined number of reported seizures of laboratories in the Midwest and Southeast Regions from 2001 to 2003 increased by 84 percent (from 3,194 to 5,885). Increases in such seizures were most notable in Kentucky (127 to 349) and in Illinois (207 to 421).

 


To Top      To Contents     To Previous Page     To Sources

To Publications Page     To Home Page


End of page.