The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)

Permanent Workforce:  17,065 Temporary Workforce:  1,396 Total Workforce:   18,461

Workforce Composition

 

 

 
Total #
 
Men
 
Women
 
Hispanic
or
Latino
 
White
 
Black
or
African American
 
Asian
Native Hawaiian/
Other Pacific Islander
American Indian/ Alaska Native Two or More Races Individuals with Targeted Disabilities
Permanent Workforce 17,065 64.68% 35.32% 5.52% 75.53% 11.68% 6.06% 0.05% 0.80% 0.36% 1.01%
Major Occupations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AEROSPACE ENGINEERING

4,319 80.18% 19.82% 5.44% 80.18% 5.83% 7.66% 0.02% 0.53% 0.32% 0.63%
GENERAL ENGINEERING

2,854 77.68% 22.32% 6.20% 81.78% 5.78% 5.05% 0.00% 0.91% 0.28% 0.35%
COMPUTER ENGINEERING

932 70.28% 29.72% 4.61% 71.89% 10.62% 11.70% 0.11% 0.64% 0.43% 0.64%
GS-14 and GS-15* 7,945 75.24% 24.76% 4.51% 81.13% 6.86% 6.51% 0.05% 0.70% 0.24% 0.49%
Senior Pay Level* 533 80.11% 19.89% 3.94% 84.99% 5.63% 4.88% 0.00% 0.38% 0.19% 0.19%
SES 431 76.57% 23.43% 4.41% 85.15% 6.03% 3.94% 0.00% 0.23% 0.23% 0.23%
First-Level Officials/ Managers 2 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 50.00% 50.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%
Mid-Level Officials/ Managers 387 64.60% 35.40% 5.17% 72.87% 13.18% 7.49% 0.26% 0.52% 0.52% 0.78%
Senior-Level Officials/ Managers 1,856 74.73% 25.27% 5.60% 82.44% 6.57% 4.63% 0.05% 0.48% 0.22% 0.27%

*Does not include pay-banded employees

Targeted Disabilities

NASA employed 178 Individuals with Targeted Disabilities in FY 2007, which was 0.96% of its total work force.  This represents an increase of 4 employees over FY 2006 and a decrease of 16 employees since FY 2003.  The participation rate for FY 2006 was 0.94% and for FY 2003 was 1.05%.  Over the 5-year period NASA had a net decrease of 0.09% in employees with targeted disabilities.

EEO Complaint Processing

I.  Counseling

NASA timely processed 96% of the 124 pre-complaint counselings (without remands) completed in FY 2007.

II.  Bases of Complaints Filed

The bases of alleged discrimination most often raised were: (1) Age; (2) Reprisal; and (3) Race (Black).  Of the 57 complaints filed at NASA, 18 contained allegations of race (Black) discrimination, 4 contained allegations of race (White) discrimination, 1 contained allegations of race (Asian) discrimination, 4 contained allegations of color discrimination and 15 contained allegations of disability discrimination.

III.  Complaint Processing Times

Of the 25 completed investigations, 100% were timely.  NASA's average time for completing an investigation was 170 days.  Of the agencies completing 25 or more investigations, the Tennessee Valley Authority had the lowest average of 93 days.

NASA's average processing time for all complaint closures decreased from 545 days in FY 2006 to 296 days in FY 2007.  The government-wide average was 355 days.

IV.  Costs

NASA reported paying no monetary benefits for 19 pre-complaint settlements.  NASA expended a total of $70,848 for 25 complaint investigations, for an average expenditure of $2,833.

NASA agreed to pay a total of $68,214 for 20 complaint closures through settlement agreements, final agency decisions, and final agency orders fully implementing AJ decisions.  For complaint closures with benefits, the average award was $3,410.


Outcome of Counselings Completed in FY 2007
Pre-Complaint Counseling Outcomes Completed by EEO Counselor Completed Using ADR All Completed Counselings
# % # % # %
Pre-Complaint Counselings: 92 32 124
Settlements 12 13% 7 21.9% 19 15.3%
Withdrawals or No Complaints Filed 29 31.5% 14 43.8% 43 34.7%
Complaints Filed* 57 46%
Decision to File Complaint Pending at End of Fiscal Year 5 4%

*Includes only complaints filed in FY 2007 where counseling was also completed during FY 2007.

Agency Use of ADR for EEO Dispute Resolution in FY 2007
Counseling Complaint
Completed/Ended Counselings/Complaint Closures 124 46
Total Number Offered ADR 90 20
ADR Offer Rate* 72.6% 43.5%
ADR Participation Rate* 25.8% 34.8%
Total ADR Settlements 7 11
Total ADR Settlements Amount $0.00 $45,964.00

* EEOC revised the formula for calculating the ADR offer and participation rates in FY 2006.

Timeliness in FY 2007
Total # # Timely % Timely FY 2006 APD* FY 2007 APD % Change
All Pre-Complaint Counselings (minus remands) 124 119 96%
All Investigations 25 25 100% 233 170 -27%
All Complaint Closures 46 545 296 -45.7%
Merit Decisions (no AJ) 6 0 0% 916 713 -22.2%
Dismissal Decisions (no AJ) 14 316 83 -73.7%

*APD = Average Processing Days

Outcomes of Complaints in FY 2007
Complaint
Closures
Final Agency
Decision (no AJ
Decision)
Final Order (AJ
Decision Fully
Implemented)
Final Order (AJ
Decision Not Fully
Implemented)
# % # % # % # %
Total Complaints Filed 57
Total Closures 46
Settlements 19 41.3%
Withdrawals 3 6.5%
Total Final Agency Actions 24 52.2% 20 83.3% 4 16.7% 0 0%
Dismissals 14  58.3% 14 100% 0 0% 0 0%
Merit Decisions 10  41.7% 6 60% 4 40% 0 0%
Finding Discrimination 1  10% 1 100% 0 0% 0 0%
Finding No Discrimination 9  90% 5 55.6% 4 44.4% 0 0%


This page was last modified on August 19, 2008.

Home Return to Home Page