skip
general nav links
About ACHP
ACHP News
National Historic
Preservation
Program
Working with
Section 106
Federal, State, & Tribal Programs
Training & Education
Publications
Search |
|
skip
specific nav links
Home Working
with Section 106 ACHP
Case Digest Spring
2003 New York: Transfer of Ownership of the Mechanicville Hydroelectric Plant
New York: Transfer of Ownership of the Mechanicville Hydroelectric Plant
Agency: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
As reported
in the Spring and Fall 2002 Case Digests, the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission accepted the surrendered license for a private
historic hydroelectric plant before an agreement could be reached
on the treatment of the property.
The plant, listed
in the National Register for exemplary significance in the fields
of industry, architecture, and engineering, may be the only remaining
pre-1900 facility with its original equipment intact. Its fate is
still being considered.
|
In fall 2002, after the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) denied
the ACHPs request for a rehearing of FERCs order accepting
the surrendered license for the National Register-listed Mechanicville
Hydroelectric Plant, the ACHP filed a request that FERC reconsider the
denial.
Mechanicville Hydroelectric Plant, Mechanicville,
NY (photo courtesy of Fourth Branch Associates and New York State Office
of Parks, Recreation, and Historic Preservation)
In December 2002, FERC held a technical conference to consider alternatives
to filling the hydroelectric plants forebay and tailrace water passages
with concrete to maintain and improve the structural stability of the
powerhouse.
In February 2003, FERC submitted an agreement to the ACHP and the New
York State Historic Preservation Officer that called for recordation of
the historic property. Both agencies declined to sign the agreement, and
in March 2003, FERC denied the ACHPs request for reconsideration
and terminated consultation.
However, through arbitration, the co-licensees for the hydroelectric
plant reached a settlement regarding the fate of the project. In the settlement,
the licensee that owns the historic property would give the plant and
financial support to the other licensee, which would rehabilitate the
plant and resume operation.
This development is very encouraging, but FERC must first accept the
terms of the settlement. Careful consideration of the proposed rehabilitation
and reuse of the hydroelectric plant will begin in April 2003 with a presentation
to FERC and the other consulting parties by the licensee or co-licensees.
For background information on this case, see the spring and fall 2002
Case Digests at www.achp.gov/casearchive/.
Staff contact: Laura
Henley Dean
Posted
August 15, 2003
Return to Top |