U.S. Department of Education: Promoting Educational Excellence for all Americans

A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

Grants to States and Preschool Grants Program--IDEA Part B - 2002

CFDA Numbers: 84.027 - Special Education_Grants to States
84.173 - Special Education_Preschool Grants


Goal 8: To improve results for children with disabilities by assisting state and local educational agencies to provide children with disabilities access to high-quality education that will help them meet challenging standards and prepare them for employment and independent living.
Objective 8.1 of 5: All preschool children with disabilities receive services that prepare them to enter school ready to learn.
Indicator 8.1.1 of 1: Inclusive settings : The percentage of preschool children with disabilities who are receiving special education and related services in inclusive settings (e.g., regular kindergarten, public preschool programs, Head Start, or child care facilities) will increase.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Percentage of preschool children with disabilities receiving services in inclusive settings
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1998
41.40
 
1999
41.40
 
2000
39.80
 
2001
38.90
 
Status: Unable to judge

Explanation: New state data collections typically take up to five years to achieve reliability. Because there is a one-year lag in the availability of this data after collection, the data that became available in 2002 is for 2000-2001  
Additional Source Information: IDEA State-reported data

Frequency: Annually.
Collection Period: 2001 - 2002
Data Available: September 2003
Validated By: Federal Statistical Agencies.

 

Objective 8.2 of 5: ALL CHILDREN WHO WOULD TYPICALLY BE IDENTIFIED AS BEING ELIGIBLE FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION AT AGE 8 OR OLDER AND WHO ARE EXPERIENCING EARLY READING OR BEHAVIORAL DIFFICULTIES RECEIVE APPROPRIATE SERVICES EARLIER TO AVOID FALLING BEHIND THEIR PEERS.
Indicator 8.2.1 of 1: Earlier identification and intervention: The percentage of children served under IDEA ages 6 or 7, compared to ages 6 to 21, will increase.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Percentage of children served under IDEA under ages 6 or 7
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
% of children
% of children
1997
13
 
1998
13.40
 
1999
12.80
14
Status: Unable to judge

Explanation: This indicator is under review by the Department. Therefore no actual data or are shown after 1999-or 2000.  
Additional Source Information: IDEA state reported data


Validated By: Federal Statistical Agencies.

 

Objective 8.3 of 5: ALL CHILDREN WITH DISABILITIES HAVE ACCESS TO THE GENERAL CURRICULUM AND ASSESSMENTS, WITH APPROPRIATE ACCOMMODATIONS, SUPPORTS, AND SERVICES, CONSISTENT WITH HIGH STANDARDS.
Indicator 8.3.1 of 2: Regular education settings (school age): The percentage of children with disabilities ages 6 to 21 who are reported by states as being served in the regular education classroom at least 80 percent of the day will increase.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Percentage of children
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
% of Children
% of Children
1996
52.60
 
1997
45.70
 
1998
46.40
 
1999
47.40
48
2000
47.30
47.50
2001
46.50
48.50
2002
 
48.80
Status: Unable to judge

Explanation: The percentage of children served in regular education classrooms at least 80 percent of the day decreased from 47.3 percent in 2000 to 46.5 percent in 2001. Because there is a one-year lag in the availability of this data after collection, the data that became available in 2002 is for 2000-2001.  
Additional Source Information: Sate-reported data required under IDEA.

Frequency: Annually.
Collection Period: 2001 - 2002
Data Available: September 2003
Validated By: Federal Statistical Agencies.

Limitations: The Department is taking steps to reduce the amount of time for collecting and reporting data.

 
Indicator 8.3.2 of 2: Performance on National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP): The percentage of students with disabilities who meet or exceed basic levels in reading, math, and science in the NAEP will increase. The number of students with disabilities who do not meet basic standards will decrease. The percentage of students who are excluded from the NAEP because of their disabilities will decrease.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Percentage of students with disabilities who met or exceeded basic levels-4th grade
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
Reading Math Science
Reading Math Science
1996
  43.30 38.60
     
1998
24    
     
2000
21.50 30.30 36.70
     

Percentage of students with disabilities who met or exceeded basic levels-8th grade
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
Reading Math Science
Reading Math Science
1996
  26.80 16.70
     
1998
28    
     
2000
0 23.40 25.90
     

Percentage of students with disabilities who met or exceeded basic levels-12th Grade
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
Reading Math Science
Reading Math Science
1996
  9.40 16.30
     
1998
34    
     
2000
  22.90 15.60
     

Number of students who did not meet basic level-4th Grade
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
Reading Math Science
Reading Math Science
1996
  275,907 298,778
     
1998
387,016    
     

Number of students who did not meet basic level-8th Grade
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
Reading Math Science
Reading Math Science
1996
  308,728 351,326
     
1998
321,330    
     

Number of students who did not meet basic level-12th Grade
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
Reading Math Science
Reading Math Science
1996
  241,110 223,672
     
1998
200,173    
     

Percentage of students excluded from NAEP-4th Grade
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
Reading Math Science
Reading Math Science
1996
  4 5
     
1998
6    
     
2000
4 3 3
     

Percentage of students excluded from NAEP-8th Grade
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
Reading Math Science
Reading Math Science
1996
  3 4
     
1998
5    
     
2000
  3 3
     

Percentage of students excluded from NAEP-12th Grade
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
Reading Math Science
Reading Math Science
1996
  3 3
     
2000
  2 2
     
Status: Unable to judge

Explanation: Data for this indicator are based on NAEP reading, math and science score. Since each NAEP subject test is administered in a different year, data reported in this indicator will vary. For Math and Science the percentage excluded from NAEP includes public and private school students. For Reading the percentage includes only public school students. The percentage reported for 8th grade Math who met or exceeded basic levels has been corrected to 26.8 percent based on an error in reporting last year's data.  
Additional Source Information: Analysis of data from National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).

Frequency: Other.

Data Available: January 2003
Analysis of data from National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP).

Limitations: Data on children with disabilities who meet or exceed basic standards are based on very small sample sizes, and, therefore, have a low level of reliability.

 

Objective 8.4 of 5: SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE THE SUPPORT THEY NEED TO COMPLETE HIGH SCHOOL PREPARED FOR POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION OR EMPLOYMENT.
Indicator 8.4.1 of 1: Graduation: The percentage of children with disabilities exiting school with a regular high school diploma will increase, and the percentage who drop out will decrease.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Percentage of students
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
Graduation Drop out
Graduation Drop out
1996
52.60 34.10
   
1997
53.50 32.70
   
1998
55.40 31
   
1999
57.40 28.90
56 31
2000
56.20 29.40
57 30
2001
57 29.40
59 27
2002
   
60 26
Status: Unable to judge

Explanation: Because there is a one-year lag in the availability of this data after collection, the data that became available in 2002 is for 2000-2001. From 2000 to 2001, the percentage of children with disabilities who graduated with a high school diploma increased from 56.2 percent to 57 percent, while the percentage who dropped out remained at 29.4 percent.  
Additional Source Information: State reported data required under IDEA.

Frequency: Annually.
Collection Period: 2001 - 2002
Data Available: September 2003
Validated By: Federal Statistical Agencies.

Limitations: Supplemental descriptive information will be provided by the National Longitudinal Study II.

 

Objective 8.5 of 5: STATES ARE ADDRESSING THEIR NEEDS FOR PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT CONSISTENT WITH THEIR COMPREHENSIVE SYSTEM OF PERSONNEL DEVELOPMENT (CSPD).
Indicator 8.5.1 of 1: Qualified personnel: The number of states and outlying areas where at least 90 percent of special education teachers are fully certified in the area in which they are teaching will increase.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Number of States
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
 
No. of States Serving Ages 3-5 No. of States Serving Ages 6-21
No. of States Serving Ages 3-5 No. of States Serving Ages 6-21
1996
34 39
   
1997
36 38
   
1998
38 40
   
1999
36 37
40 41
2000
36 37
41 42
2001
   
40 42
2002
   
40 42
Status: Unable to judge

Explanation: Because there is a one-year lag in the availability of this data after collection, the data that became available in 2002 is for 2000-2001. There is a clustering of states around the 90 percent goal in the indicator, which may result in unpredictable changes from year to year. However, evidence of a positive trend is expected to be evident over a 5- to 7- year period.

Note: Data for actual performance for 1996-2000 have been revised to eliminate effects of rounding. This has resulted in lower results than previously reported.

 
Additional Source Information: IDEA state reported data

Frequency: Annually.
Collection Period: 2001 - 2002
Data Available: September 2003
Validated By: Federal Statistical Agencies.

Limitations: The Department is taking steps to reduce the amount of time for collecting and reporting.

 

Return to table of contents