U.S. Department of Education: Promoting Educational Excellence for all Americans

A r c h i v e d  I n f o r m a t i o n

Gallaudet University - 2002

CFDA Number: 84.994K Gallaudet University Programs, Elementary and Secondary Education Programs, Pre-College Programs, Endowment Grant


Goal 8: To challenge students who are deaf, graduate students who are deaf, and graduate students who are hearing, to achieve their academic goals and obtain productive employment, provide leadership in setting the national standard for best practices in education of the deaf and hard of hearing, and establish a sustainable resource base.
Objective 8.1 of 2: University programs and the Model Secondary School for the Deaf and the Kendall Demonstration Elementary School will optimize the number of students completing programs of study
Indicator 8.1.1 of 3: Enrollment at Gallaudet University: Maintain a minimum enrollment of 1,250 undergraduate and 700 graduate students; 70 students in professional studies; 225 students at the Model Secondary School; and 140 students at the Kendall Demonstration Elementary School.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Undergraduate enrollment
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1998
1,339
 
1999
1,300
1,250
2000
1,318
1,250
2001
1,321
1,250
2002
1,243
1,250
2003
1,243
1,250

Graduate enrollment
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1998
714
 
1999
628
700
2000
541
700
2001
625
700
2002
517
700
2003
617
700

Professional studies enrollment
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1998
92
 
1999
70
70
2000
86
70
2001
93
70
2002
92
70
2003
154
70

Model School enrollment
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1998
224
 
1999
209
225
2000
219
225
2001
205
225
2002
188
225
2003
190
225

Kendall School enrollment
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1998
137
 
1999
117
140
2000
135
140
2001
148
140
2002
148
140
2003
152
140
Status: Unable to judge

Progress: There was a considerable increase in graduate enrollment in fiscal year 2002. In fiscal year 2003, the Undergraduate enrollment fell slightly short its target. The Professional Studies enrollment and Kendall School enrollment targets were exceeded in 2003; Model Secondary School fell short of its target in 2003.

Explanation: The 2002 Undergraduate enrollment, which was slightly short its target was addressed through a number of strategic recruitment activities during fiscal year 2002. The fiscal year 2002 enrollment at the Kendall School exceeded its target. The Model School has developed strategies to address enrollment. In fiscal year 2003, the total undergraduate enrollment held steady at 1,243, very near its target. The Graduate enrollment, while not meeting its target, increased considerably over the fiscal year 2002 enrollment. Implementation of key strategies for increasing Graduate and Professional Studies enrollments has resulted in substantial increases in both categories. While the Model Secondary School did not reach its target enrollment, it slightly increased enrollment over the fiscal year 2002 level. The Kendal School enrollment increased approximately 3 percent over the fiscal year 2002 level, again exceeding its target. Gallaudet has established minimum enrollment targets based on longstanding enrollment targets and historical trends recognizing that actual figures vary from year to year.  
Additional Source Information: Collegiate Office of Enrollment Services, and Clerc Center student database, FY 2003 enrollment as of October 2002, summarized in Gallaudet's FY 2002 annual report, submitted in 2003.

Frequency: Annually.
Collection Period: 2003
Data Available: October 2003
Validated By: No Formal Verification.
Data supplied by Gallaudet University and the Clerc Center. No formal verification procedure applied.

 
Indicator 8.1.2 of 3: Student retention rate: Increase the undergraduate retention rate and maintain a minimum retention rate of 90 percent at the Model School/Kendall School.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Undergraduate retention rate
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1998
72
 
1999
73
75
2000
72
76
2001
71
76
2002
73
76
2003
 
76

Clerc Center: Model School and Kendall School retention rate
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1998
85
 
1999
92
90
2000
82
90
2001
88
90
2002
86
90
2003
 
90
Status: Target not met

Progress: The undergraduate retention rate fell show its target, however, there was an increase over the fiscal year 2001 rate for undergraduates. The Clerc Center (Model and Kendall) retention rate fell short its target in fiscal year 2002

Explanation: The percentage of students returning to the University increased 2 percent from fiscal year 2001, making performance very close to the target. Increased focus on retention of students and particular attention to the success of first year students have contributed to the increase. The fiscal year 2002 Clerc Center retention rate o f86 percent is nearly at the same level reported for fiscal year 2001 but still slightly below the target.  
Additional Source Information: Collegiate Office of the Register and Clerc Center (Model and Kendall Schools) Office of Exemplary Programs and Research records, summarized in the FY 2002 annual report, submitted in 2003.

Frequency: Annually.
Collection Period: 2003
Data Available: October 2003
Validated By: No Formal Verification.
Data supplied by Gallaudet University and the Clerc Center

Limitations: Gallaudet plans to refine the retention rate indicator for the Clerc Center students and how progress toward its target is calculated, so that it more validly reflects the provision of a free appropriate public education (FAPE) to Clerc Center students. The concepts of retention and persistence at the postsecondary level do not translate appropriately to elementary and secondary special education.

 
Indicator 8.1.3 of 3: Student graduation rate: The undergraduate graduation rates at the university will increase. The Model School graduation rate will be maintained.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Undergraduate graduation rate
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1998
41
 
1999
42
41
2000
41
42
2001
41
43
2002
42
44
2003
 
45

Model School graduation rate
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1998
93
 
1999
88
94
2000
98
94
2001
90
94
2002
80
94
2003
 
94
Status: Target not met

Progress: The Undergraduate graduation rate declined from the previous year and fell short its target. The Model Secondary School graduation rate declined from the previous year and fell short of its target.

Explanation: The University's performance increased slightly from fiscal year 2001, but fell short its target. The University has instituted a number of strategies to improve its undergraduate graduation rate. The Model School 80 percent graduation rate reflects those students who completed all graduation requirements by the end of their senior year. An additional 5 percent deferred graduation pending completion of course work, and 13 percent changed their graduation date and will return for the fifth year option. Therefore, the total projected graduation rate for fiscal year 2002 senior class is expected to be 98 percent.  
Additional Source Information: Collegiate Office of the Registrar and the Clerc Center Office of Exemplary Programs and Research records, summarized in FY 2002 annual report, submitted in 2003.

Frequency: Annually.
Collection Period: 2003
Data Available: October 2003
Validated By: No Formal Verification.
Data supplied by Gallaudet University and Clerc Center.

Limitations: Gallaudet plans to reconceptualize how performance is assessed for the Model School graduation rate to make this indicator a more valid reflection of what really occurs with a given senior class. Students may graduate at the end of their senior year, or they may make the decision, as part of the Individualized Education Program (IEP) process, to change their graduation so they may continue to pursue their IEP goals, or they may elect to take the fifth year option.

 

Objective 8.2 of 2: Gallaudet works in partnership with others to develop and disseminate educational programs and materials for deaf and hard-of-hearing students.
Indicator 8.2.1 of 1: Use of the Demonstration Schools' expertise: Other programs and/or institutions adopting innovative curricula and other products, or modifying their strategies as a result of Model and Kendall's leadership, will be maintained or increased.
Targets and Performance Data Assessment of Progress Sources and Data Quality
Programs adopting Model/Kendall Innovative strategies/curricula
Year Actual Performance Performance Targets
1998
41
 
1999
52
41
2000
62
41
2001
39
41
2002
56
41
Status: Target exceeded

Progress: The Clerc Center exceeded its target in fiscal year 2002.

Explanation: Fifty-six new programs adopted innovative Clerc Center strategies or curricula in FY 2002, representing an increase over fiscal year 2001 and exceeding its target in fiscal year 2002. Again, it should be noted that the number of new programs adopting innovations from year to year will vary and depends in part on the number and type of strategies and curricula being disseminated by the Clerc Center and the financial and personnel resources available within other programs to participate in training and implementation activities.  
Additional Source Information: Records of the Clerc Center Office of Training and Professional Development, summarized in the FY 2002 Annual Report, submitted in January 2003.

Frequency: Annually.
Collection Period: 2003
Data Available: October 2003
Validated By: No Formal Verification.
Data supplied by Gallaudet University and the Clerc Center. No formal verification procedures applied.

 

Return to table of contents