skip navigational links United States Department of Labor
May 8, 2009        
DOL Home > OALJ Home > Whistleblower Collection
DOL Home USDOL/OALJ Reporter
Cartwright v. Lockheed Martin Utitity Services, Inc., 97-ERA-41 (ARB Oct. 31, 1997)


U.S. Department of Labor
Administrative Review Board
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210

ARB CASE NO. 98-010
(ALJ CASE NO. 97-ERA-41)
DATE: October 31, 1997

In the Matter of:

RICHARD D. CARTWRIGHT,
    COMPLAINANT,

    v.

LOCKHEED MARTIN UTILITY
SERVICES, INC.,
    RESPONDENT.

BEFORE: THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

   Before the Board for review is the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ's) October 22, 1997 Recommended Order of Dismissal issued in the captioned matter, arising under the employee protection provision of the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974, as amended (ERA), 42 U.S.C. §5851 (1988). Prior to a hearing, Complainant and Respondent filed a joint motion to dismiss Complainant's case on the ground that the complaint did not raise an environmental safety violation as required for protection under the ERA.


[Page 2]

   Voluntary dismissals of ERA complaints are governed by Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. See Nolder v. Kaiser Engineers, Inc. Case No 84-ERA-5, Sec. Dec., June 28, 1985, slip op. at 6-8; Blevins v. Tennessee Valley Authority, Case No. 90-ERA-4, Sec. Dec., June 28, 1993, slip op. at 2. Accordingly, the ALJ's recommendation is accepted and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2).

   SO ORDERED.

      DAVID A O'BRIEN
      Chair

      KARL J. SANDSTROM
      Member

      JOYCE D. MILLER
      Alternate Member



Phone Numbers