Friday contends that we should reconsider our decision because the Bankruptcy Court did not "dismiss" his claims; therefore they survived the bankruptcy and can be further litigated in the Department of Labor. Furthermore, he argues that reconsideration is warranted because he was not seeking monetary damages, thus his claim was not dischargeable in bankruptcy.
But Friday's arguments do not fall within any of the four limited circumstances under which we will reconsider our decisions. Therefore, we DENY Friday's motion.
SO ORDERED.
OLIVER M. TRANSUE
Administrative Appeals Judge
M. CYNTHIA DOUGLASS
Chief Administrative Appeals Judge
[ENDNOTES]
1 49 U.S.C.A. § 42121(a) (West Supp. 2006).
2 See Knox v. U.S. Dep't of Interior, ARB No. 03-040, ALJ No. 2001-CAA-003 (Oct. 24, 2005).
3 See, e.g., Shrader v. CSX Transp., Inc., 70 F.3d 255, 257 (2d Cir. 1995); Virgin Atl. Airways, Ltd. v. National Mediation Bd., 956 F.2d 1245, 1255 (2d Cir. 1992); Weinstock v. Wilk, 2004 WL 367618, at *1 (D. Conn. Feb. 25, 2004); Motorola, Inc. v. J.B. Rodgers Mech. Contractors, Inc., 215 F.R.D. 581, 582-586 (D. Ariz. 2003).