Primary Navigation for the CDC Website
CDC en Español
2006 Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) Report: Section 5—ART Trends, 1996–2006
This report marks the twelfth consecutive year that CDC has published an annual report detailing the success rates for ART clinics in the United States. Having several years of data provides us with the opportunity to examine trends in ART use and success rates over time. Because the first year of data collection, 1995, did not include non-SART member clinics, we limit our examination of trends to the years 1996–2006.

Is the use of ART increasing?

Figure 49 shows the numbers of ART cycles performed, live-birth deliveries, and infants born using ART from 1996 through 2006. The number of ART cycles performed in the United States has more than doubled, from 64,681 cycles in 1996 to 138,198 in 2006. The number of live-birth deliveries in 2006 (41,343) was more than two and a half times higher than in 1996 (14,507). The number of infants born who were conceived using ART also increased steadily between 1996 and 2006. In 2006, 54,656 infants were born, which was more than two and a half times the 20,840 born in 1996. Because in some cases more than one infant is born during a live-birth delivery (e.g., twins), the total number of infants born is greater than the number of live-birth deliveries.

Figure 49: Numbers of ART Cycles Performed, Live-Birth Deliveries, and Infants Born Using ART, 1996–2006.

 

Figure 49: Numbers of ART Cycles Performed, Live-Birth Deliveries, and Infants Born Using ART,
1996–2006.

 

 

 


Have there been changes in the type of ART cycles performed among women who used fresh or frozen nondonor eggs or embryos?

Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was originally developed to use in ART cycles to improve fertilization rates when severe male factor infertility was the indication for using ART. Today, this procedure is widely used even among couples without a diagnosis of male factor infertility.

Figure 50 shows the numbers of ART cycles performed using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos with or without ICSI and the numbers of cycles using frozen nondonor eggs or embryos from 1996 through 2006. During the past 11 years, while the number of fresh–nondonor cycles performed without ICSI remained stable, the number of fresh–nondonor cycles performed with ICSI increased four times from 14,885 in 1996 to 61,835 in 2006. The number of frozen–nondonor cycles more than doubled, from 9,445 in 1996 to 22,023 in 2006.

Note that the information on use of ICSI was not collected for ART cycles using frozen embryos; therefore, cycles using frozen embryos are presented together as one group.

Figure 50: Numbers of ART Cycles Using Fresh or Frozen Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by ICSI, 1996–2006.

 

Figure 50: Numbers of ART Cycles Using Fresh or Frozen Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by ICSI, 1996–2006.

 

 

 


Have there been changes in the types of ART cycles performed among women who used fresh or frozen donor eggs or embryos?

Figure 51 shows the numbers of ART cycles performed using fresh donor eggs or embryos with or without ICSI and cycles using frozen donor eggs or embryos. While the number of fresh–donor cycles performed without ICSI remained fairly stable during the past 11 years, the number of fresh–donor cycles performed with ICSI increased from 857 in 1996 to 7,039 in 2006. The number of frozen–donor cycles increased from 1,118 in 1996 to 5,992 in 2006. In particular, during reporting year 2006, fresh donor eggs with ICSI were used the most among all donor cycles.

Note that the information on use of ICSI was not collected for ART cycles using frozen embryos; therefore, cycles using frozen embryos are presented together as one group.

Figure 51: Numbers of ART Cycles Using Fresh or Frozen Donor Eggs or Embryos, by ICSI, 1996–2006.

 

Figure 51: Numbers of ART Cycles Using Fresh or Frozen Donor Eggs or Embryos, by ICSI, 1996–2006.

 

 

 

 


Have there been improvements in the percentage of transfers that result in live births among women who used fresh or frozen nondonor eggs or embryos?

Figure 52 presents percentages of transfers that resulted in live births for ART cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos with or without ICSI and for cycles using frozen nondonor eggs or embryos. Percentages of transfers that resulted in live births are presented rather than percentages of cycles that resulted in live births because this is the only way to directly compare cycles using fresh embryos with those using frozen embryos.

Overall, higher success rates were consistently observed among fresh–nondonor cycles than frozen–nondonor cycles. The percentage of transfers that resulted in live births for fresh–nondonor cycles performed without ICSI increased from 28% in 1996 to 37% in 2006. Over the same period, the percentage of transfers that resulted in live births for cycles using fresh nondonor embryos performed with ICSI remained slightly lower than without ICSI, but steadily increased. The percentage of transfers that resulted in live births for cycles using frozen nondonor embryos increased from 17% in 1996 to 29% in 2006, but was generally lower than the percentage of transfers that resulted in live births for cycles using fresh nondonor embryos.

Note that the information on use of ICSI was not collected for ART cycles using frozen embryos; therefore, such cycles are presented together as one group.

Figure 52: Percentages of Transfers That Resulted in Live Births Using Fresh or Frozen Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by ICSI, 1996–2006.

 

Figure 52: Percentages of Transfers That Resulted in Live Births Using Fresh or Frozen Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by ICSI, 1996–2006.

 

 

 


Have there been improvements in the percentage of transfers that result in live births among women who used fresh or frozen donor eggs or embryos?

Figure 53 presents the percentages of transfers that resulted in live births for ART cycles using fresh donor eggs or embryos with or without ICSI and for cycles using frozen donor eggs or embryos. Percentages of transfers that resulted in live births are presented rather than percentages of cycles that resulted in live births because that is the only way to directly compare cycles using fresh embryos with those using frozen embryos.

Similar to the trends shown in Figure 52 for nondonor cycles, the success rates for cycles using fresh donor eggs or embryos were generally higher than for cycles using frozen donor eggs or embryos during 1996–2006. The percentage of transfers that resulted in live births for cycles that used fresh donor eggs or embryos performed without ICSI increased from 39% in 1996 to 56% in 2006. Over the same period, the percentage of transfers resulting in live births increased from 39% to 53% for cycles that used fresh donor eggs or embryos and were performed with ICSI, and from 21% to 32% for cycles that used frozen donor eggs or embryos.

Note that the information on use of ICSI was not collected for ART cycles using frozen embryos; therefore, such cycles are presented together as one group.

Figure 53: Percentages of Transfers That Resulted in Live Births Using Fresh or Frozen Donor Eggs or Embryos, by ICSI, 1996–2006.

 

Figure 53: Percentages of Transfers That Resulted in Live Births Using Fresh or Frozen Donor Eggs or Embryos, by ICSI, 1996–2006.

 

 

 


Have there been improvements in the percentage of transfers that result in singleton live births among women who used fresh or frozen nondonor eggs or embryos?

Singleton live births are an important measure of success because they entail a much lower risk than multiple-infant births for adverse infant health outcomes, including prematurity, low birth weight, disability, and death. Figure 54 presents percentages of transfers that resulted in singleton live births for ART cycles performed using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos with or without ICSI or for cycles using frozen nondonor eggs or embryos.

While the total numbers of nondonor cycles using ICSI greatly increased over the past 11 years (see Figure 50), the percentage of transfers that resulted in singleton live births from these cycles were not any higher than those without ICSI: 17% to 24% with ICSI versus 17% to 25% without ICSI.

Over the same period, the percentage of transfers that resulted in singleton live births among frozen–nondonor cycles increased from 12% to 22%.

Note that the information on use of ICSI was not collected for ART cycles using frozen embryos; therefore, such cycles are presented together as one group.

Figure 54: Percentages of Transfers That Resulted in Singleton Live Births Among Women Using Fresh or Frozen Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by ICSI, 1996–2006.

 

Figure 54: Percentages of Transfers That Resulted in Singleton Live Births Among Women Using Fresh or Frozen Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, by ICSI, 1996–2006.

 

 


Have there been improvements in the percentage of transfers that result in singleton live births among women who used fresh or frozen donor eggs or embryos?

Singleton live births are an important measure of success because they entail a much lower risk than multiple-infant births for adverse infant health outcomes, including prematurity, low birth weight, disability, and death. Figure 55 presents percentages of transfers that resulted in singleton live births for ART cycles performed using fresh donor eggs or embryos with or without ICSI or for cycles using frozen donor eggs or embryos.

The percentage of transfers that resulted in singleton live births were consistently higher for fresh–donor cycles than for frozen–donor cycles. Percentages increased for fresh–donor cycles without ICSI from 22% in 1996 to 33% in 2006; a similar increase from 24% to 33% was observed for cycles with ICSI. Over the same period, the percentage of transfers that resulted in singleton live births increased from 15% to 24% for frozen–donor cycles.

Note that the information on use of ICSI was not collected for ART cycles using frozen embryos; therefore,such cycles are presented together as one group.

Figure 55: Percentages of Transfers That Resulted in Singleton Live Births Among Women Using Fresh or Frozen Donor Eggs or Embryos, by ICSI, 1996–2006.

 

Figure 55: Percentages of Transfers That Resulted in Singleton Live Births Among Women Using Fresh or Frozen Donor Eggs or Embryos, by ICSI, 1996–2006.

 

 

 


Have there been improvements in the percentage of transfers that result in live births for all ART patients or only for those in particular age groups?

Figure 56 presents percentages of transfers that resulted in live births, by woman’s age, for ART cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos.

From 1996 through 2006, the percentage of transfers that resulted in live births for women younger than 35 increased 33%, from 34% in 1996 to 45% in 2006. Over the same period, the percentage of transfers that resulted in live births increased 28% for women 35–37, 24% for women 38–40, 31% for women 41–42, and 22% for women older than 42.

Figure 56: Percentages of Transfers That Resulted in Live Births for ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor  Eggs or Embryos, by Woman’s Age, 1996–2006.

 

Figure 56: Percentages of Transfers That Resulted in Live Births for ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor  Eggs or Embryos, by Woman’s Age, 1996–2006.

 

 

 


Have there been improvements in the percentage of transfers that result in singleton live births for all ART patients or only for those in particular age groups?

Singleton live births are an important measure of success because they have a much lower risk than multiple-infant births for adverse infant health outcomes, including prematurity, low birth weight, disability, and death. Figure 57 presents percentages of transfers that resulted in singleton live births, by woman’s age, for ART cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos.

From 1996 through 2006, the percentage of transfers that resulted in singleton live births for women younger than 35 increased about 52%, from 19% in 1996 to 29% in 2006. Over the same period, the percentage of transfers that resulted in singleton live births increased 42% for women 35–37, 34% for women 38–40, 34% for women 41–42, and 30% for women older than 42.

Figure 57: Percentages of Transfers (Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos) That Resulted in Singleton Live Births, by Woman’s Age, 1996–2006.

 

Figure 57: Percentages of Transfers (Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos) That Resulted in Singleton Live Births, by Woman’s Age, 1996–2006.

 

 

 


Has the number of embryos transferred in fresh–nondonor cycles changed?

Figure 58 presents the trends for number of embryos transferred in fresh–nondonor cycles that progressed to the embryo transfer stage. From 1996 through 2006, cycles that involved the transfer of one embryo increased slightly, from 6% to 11%; cycles that involved the transfer of two embryos increased dramatically, from 10% in 1996 to 46% in 2006. Cycles that involved the transfer of three embryos increased from 23% in 1996 to 28% in 2006, and cycles that involved the transfer of four or more embryos decreased from 62% in 1996 to 16% in 2006.

Figure 58: Percentages of Fresh–Nondonor Cycles That Involved the Transfer of One, Two, Three, or Four or More Embryos, 1996–2006.

 

Figure 58: Percentages of Fresh–Nondonor Cycles That Involved the Transfer of One, Two, Three, or Four or More Embryos, 1996–2006.

 

 

 


Has the number of embryos transferred in each ART cycle changed for women younger than 35 who have more embryos available than they choose to transfer?

As shown in Figure 58, the number of embryos transferred in fresh–nondonor cycles has decreased during the past 11 years. Figure 59 shows the change over time in the number of embryos transferred for ART procedures in which the woman was younger than 35 and the couple chose to set aside some embryos for future cycles rather than transfer all available embryos at one time. Previous research suggests that the number of embryos available for an ART cycle is important in predicting success. Younger women also tend to have higher success rates (see Figure 14).

Overall, the number of embryos transferred decreased among couples who chose to transfer fewer embryos than were available. In 1996, almost two-thirds (64%) of ART cycles involved the transfer of four or more embryos; 33%, three embryos; 3%, two embryos; and less than 1%, one embryo. By 1998, the percentage of cycles in which four or more embryos were transferred had decreased to 33%; half of all ART cycles involved the transfer of three embryos; 16% of cycles, two embryos; and less than 1%, one embryo. By 2006, four or more embryos were transferred in only 3% of cycles, three in 16% of cycles, two in 75% of cycles, and one in 7% of cycles.

Figure 59: Percentages of Fresh–Nondonor Cycles That Involved the Transfer of One, Two, Three, or Four or More Embryos in Women Who Were Younger Than 35 and Set Aside Extra Embryos for Future Use, 1996–2006.

 

Figure 59: Percentages of Fresh–Nondonor Cycles That Involved the Transfer of One, Two, Three, or Four or More Embryos in Women Who Were Younger Than 35 and Set Aside Extra Embryos for Future Use, 1996–2006.

 

 


Have there been improvements in ART success rates, by number of embryos transferred?

Figure 60 presents success rates by the number of embryos transferred for ART cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos from 1996 through 2006. In general, success rates were higher when two or more embryos were transferred. From 1996 through 2006, the success rates tripled, from 14% to 42%, for ART cycles that involved the transfer of two embryos. The success rates also increased for ART cycles that involved the transfer of either one or three embryos; however, the success rates decreased 13%, from 32% to 28%, for ART cycles that involved the transfer of four or more embryos.

The relationship between number of embryos transferred and success rates is complicated by several factors, such as the woman’s age and embryo quality. Trends over time may reflect changes in these factors.

Figure 60: Percentages of Transfers (Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos) That Resulted in Live Births, by Number of Embryos Transferred, 1996–2006.

 

Figure 60: Percentages of Transfers (Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos) That Resulted in Live Births, by Number of Embryos Transferred, 1996–2006.

 

 

 


Have there been improvements in the percentage of transfers that resulted in live births for women younger than 35 who have more embryos available than they choose to transfer?

Figure 61 shows changes over time in the number of embryos transferred and the percentage of transfers that resulted in live births for ART cycles in which the woman was younger than 35 and chose to set aside some embryos for future cycles rather than transfer all available embryos at one time. Previous research suggests that the number of embryos available for an ART cycle is an important predictor of success. Younger women also tend to have higher success rates (see Figure 14).

For this group of women, the percentage of transfers that resulted in live births generally increased over time, regardless of the number of embryos transferred. The biggest increase was for cycles in which two embryos were transferred. In 1996, the chance for a live birth was highest (41%) when three embryos were transferred; however, in 2006, the chance for a live birth was highest (55%) when two embryos were transferred.

Success rates for cycles involving the transfer of one embryo were comparable to those that involved multiple embryos. Elective single-embryo transfer minimizes the risk for multiple-infant pregnancy and related adverse outcomes. Recently, the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART)* revised its embryo transfer guidelines to encourage single-embryo transfer among patients with good prognoses.

Figure 61: Percentages of Transfers That Resulted in Live Births Among Women Who Were Younger Than 35 and Set Aside Extra Embryos for Future Use, by Number of Embryos Transferred, 1996–2006.

 

Figure 61: Percentages of Transfers That Resulted in Live Births Among Women Who Were Younger Than 35 and Set Aside Extra Embryos for Future Use, by Number of Embryos Transferred, 1996–2006.

 

 


Has the percentage of multiple-infant live births changed?

Multiple-infant births are associated with greater problems for both mothers and infants, including higher rates of caesarean section, prematurity, low birth weight, and infant disability or death. Figure 62 shows the percentages of multiple-infant live births for the four primary types of ART procedures.

For fresh–nondonor cycles, the percentage of multiple-infant live births decreased 20% since 1996, from 38% of all live births in 1996 to 31% in 2006. Over the same period, the percentage of multiple-infant live births decreased 10% for frozen–nondonor cycles and 6% for fresh–donor cycles. In all years except 1997, the percentage of multiple-infant live births remained stable for frozen–donor cycles.

Figure 62: Percentages of Cycles That Resulted in Multiple-Infant Live Births, by Type of ART Cycle, 1996–2006.

 

Figure 62: Percentages of Cycles That Resulted in Multiple-Infant Live Births, by Type of ART Cycle, 1996–2006.

 

 

 

 


Have multiple-infant live births for cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos changed for all ART patients or only for those in particular age groups?

Figure 63 shows that the percentages of multiple-infant live births decreased between 1996 and 2006 for women in all age groups. In 1996, 43% of live-birth deliveries to women younger than 35 were multiple-infant births, compared with 34% in 2006. Among women older than 42, the percentages of multiple-infant live births decreased from 14% in 1996 to 9% in 2006.

Figure 63: Percentages of Multiple-Infant Live Births, for Fresh–Nondonor Cycles, by ART Patient’s Age, 1996–2006.

Figure 63: Percentages of Multiple-Infant Live Births,
for Fresh–Nondonor Cycles, by ART Patient’s Age, 1996–2006.

 

 

 


Have the percentages of singletons, twins, and triplets or more changed for ART cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos?

Figure 64 presents the trends in percentages of transfers that resulted in live births and percentages of multiple-infant live births for ART cycles using fresh nondonor eggs or embryos. Overall, the percentage of transfers that resulted in live births increased from 28% in 1996 to 35% in 2006. From 1996 through 2006, the percentage of singleton live births increased from 62% to 69%; the percentage of twin births remained stable, ranging from 29% to 32%; and the percentage of triplet-or-more births decreased from 7% in 1996 to 2% in 2006.

It is important to note that twins, albeit to a lesser extent than triplets or more, are still at substantially greater risk for illness and death than singletons. These risks include low birth weight, preterm birth, and neurological impairments such as cerebral palsy. Both the percentages of twin and triplet-or-more births remain significantly higher for ART births than for births resulting from natural conception.

Figure 64: Percentages of Transfers That Resulted in Live Births and Percentages of Multiple-Infant Live Births for ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, 1996–2006.

 

Figure 64: Percentages of Transfers That Resulted in Live Births and Percentages of Multiple-Infant Live Births for ART Cycles Using Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos, 1996–2006.

 

 

 


Section 1 | Section 2 | Section 3 | Section 4 | Section 5

 
Selected Resources

Previous ART Reports

Implementation of the Fertility Clinic Success Rate and Certification Act of 1992

Page last reviewed: 12/3/08
Page last modified: 12/3/08
Content source: Division of Reproductive Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion

rectangle border
ART label image
bulletbullet Find a Clinic and National Summary
bulletbullet Download Report

bullet 2006 Report Home
bullet Acknowledgements
bullet Preface
bullet Commonly Asked Questions
bullet Introduction to the National Report
bullet Overview
bullet Fresh Nondonor Eggs or Embryos
bullet Frozen Nondonor Embryos
bullet Donor Eggs
bullet Trends, 1996–2006
bullet Introduction to Fertility Clinic Tables
bullet Sample Clinic Table
bullet How to Read a Fertility Clinic Table
bullet Confidence Intervals and Validation Findings
bullet Glossary of Terms
bullet Reporting Clinics
bullet Non-Reporting Clinics
bullet National Consumer Organizations
rectangle border

Reproductive Health related resources
bullet Reproductive Health Home
bullet Data and Statistics
bullet Publications and Products
bullet

Glossary

bullet Related Links

bullet Adolescent Reproductive Health
bullet Assisted Reproductive Technology
bullet Global Reproductive Health
bullet Maternal and Infant Health Research
bullet Refugee Reproductive Health
bullet Sudden Infant Death Syndrome
bullet Unintended Pregnancy
bullet Women's Reproductive Health

bullet Division of Reproductive Health

Contact Info
CDC/DRH
4770 Buford Hwy, NE
MS K-20
Atlanta, GA 30341-3717

Phone number
770-488-5200

bullet Contact Us

divider
  Home | Policies and Regulations | Disclaimer | e-Government | FOIA | Contact Us
Safer, Healthier People

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA 30333, U.S.A
Tel: (404) 639-3311 / Public Inquiries: (404) 639-3534 / (800) 311-3435
USAGov LogoDHHS Department of Health
and Human Services