|
publications > fact sheet > FS 2004-3138
U.S. Department of the Interior
U.S. Geological Survey
FS 2004-3138
Isotopic Views of Food Web Structure in the Florida Everglades
Introduction
![satellite image of South Florida, showing biota collection sites](images/fig1.jpg) |
Figure 1. Satellite image of South Florida, showing biota collection sites (image from South Florida Water Management District). The inset map shows the location of the satellite image. [larger image] |
|
Nearly one million acres of the Everglades are under a health
advisory that discourages the human consumption of largemouth
bass and several other fish because of high mercury contents.
Food web structure (base of food web, number of trophic steps)
plays a potentially critical role in determining the patterns of
mercury contamination of the Everglades ecosystem.
Methylmercury (MeHg) is present in low concentrations in water,
yet after entering the base of the food web it biomagnifies to toxic
concentrations in organisms that occupy higher trophic positions
(like bass). One of the main research questions under investigation
by a multi-agency task force in the Everglades is how MeHg bioaccumulates up the food chain in this complex aquatic
ecosystem. Understanding variations in food web structure may
help explain mercury patterns in the Everglades and ultimately
lead to more effective restoration of Everglades ecosystems.
Approach
The primary focus of this study is to determine the trophic
structure of aquatic biota in the Everglades ecosystem by analyzing
tissue samples for nitrogen and carbon isotopes. Plants,
invertebrates, and fish were collected from 16 well-studied USGS ACME (Aquatic Cycling of Mercury in the Everglades) sites
throughout the Everglades during 1995-1999 as part of a
collaboration between the USGS and the Florida Fish and Wildlife
Conservation Commission (FFWCC). Within this data set, we
focus on biota collected from six sites during two sampling periods
(September 1997 and January 1998) when a sufficient number and
variety of aquatic organisms were collected to show the general
food web structure (Figure 1).
Isotopic Clues to Relative Trophic Position
Analysis of the stable nitrogen and carbon isotopic compositions ( 15N and 13C values, respectively) of organisms in
a food web provides information about trophic relationships, or
"who eats whom". This method is based on the observation that
selective metabolism of the lighter isotopes of these elements (14N and 12C) during food assimilation and waste excretion causes
animals to become enriched in the heavier isotopes (15N and 13C)
relative to their diets (McCutchan et al., 2003).
The 15N and 13C values of tissues are integrated measures of
diet assimilated over time, with consumers typically enriched in
the heavier isotopes of nitrogen by about 3-4 and carbon by 0.8-1.2 (i.e., higher 15N/14N and 13C/12C) relative to their diet
(McCutchan et al., 2003). This expected stepwise isotopic
increase through the food chain (Figure 2A) has been used to
reconstruct relative trophic positions of organisms and estimate
mercury bioaccumulation rates in fish (Cabana and Rasmussen, 1994). Most studies using this approach have focused on
applications in northern temperate lakes, whereas relatively few
studies have applied these isotopic methods to complex,
subtropical wetlands like the Everglades.
![illustration showing expected increase in stable nitrogen and carbon isotopic of tissue with trophic level, based on field and laboratory studies](images/fig2_expectedincrease.jpg) |
![illustration showing average biota isotopic compositions from selected marsh sites across the Everglades](images/fig2_averagecomp.gif) |
Figure 2. Isotopic views of food webs in the Everglades: (A) Expected increase in 15N and 13C of tissue with trophic level, based on field and laboratory studies (McCutchan et al., 2003). (B) Average biota isotopic compositions from selected marsh sites across the Everglades. Values are relative to mosquitofish. Error bars indicate one standard deviation. Organisms occupying relatively higher trophic positions have higher 15N values, as predicted. [click on images above for larger image] |
|
Synoptic View of Everglades Food Webs
By comparing 15N and 13C values for individual organisms,
we can gain valuable information about food web structure.
Figure 2B shows "average" isotopic relationships among
organisms collected from selected marsh sites across the
Everglades. For this comparison, isotopic values of organisms
were normalized to the isotopic composition of mosquitofish at each collection site to eliminate inter-site biogeochemical
differences. As a check on the isotope-based reconstructions, we
use color-coded symbols on the isotopic plots to suggest general
trophic groups of the organisms analyzed:
[larger image]
The definitions of these groups are modified slightly from those of Loftus et al. (1998), which were based on stomach content data
obtained in the Shark Slough region of Everglades National Park,
south of our study area. Stomach contents analysis provides direct
information about an organism's recent foraging preferences.
However, unlike isotopic analysis, this method does not
distinguish between what an organism ingests and what it
assimilates (metabolizes) to make new tissue.
In general, organisms occupying relatively higher trophic
positions have correspondingly higher (less negative) 15N values,
as expected according to Figure 2A. For example, invertebrates
that eat plants and detritus (or other organisms with that diet)
typically have the lowest 15N and 13C values of the fauna
sampled. The 15N values of fish noticeably increase as the
relative proportion of plants and algae in their diets decreases. For
example, sailfin molly (an herbivore) has relatively low 15N
values and Florida gar (a carnivore) has the highest, whereas
mosquitofish (an omnivore) has intermediate values. The
invertebrates generally have 13C values similar to those measured
for particulate organic matter (POM) and detritus, which suggests
that macrophytes cannot be a major food source to these marsh
food webs. A notable exception is crayfish, which has 13C values
more consistent with a macrophyte food source.
Differences in Food Webs Among Sites
The food webs fall into two general categories, depending on
whether or not 15N values can be used to distinguish among
relative trophic positions. An organism's diet typically consists of
multiple food items of potentially different trophic positions, so
there is some expected overlap in 15N. However, for sites 3A-15,
U3, L35B, and F1, organisms occupying relatively higher trophic
positions have higher 15N values (Figure 3). For these sites, 15N
can potentially be used to investigate MeHg bioaccumulation
pathways through the food web. Interestingly, site F1 shows an
apparent reversal of expected 13C patterns, whereby lower 13C
values are found for higher trophic positions (Figure 3). The
reasons for this are unclear, but it is possible that multiple bases of
the food web with different 13C values (e.g., plants and detritus)
could contribute to this pattern. This could also result from
seasonal variations in the isotopic composition of dissolved
inorganic carbon and nitrogen in the water column, which affect
the 13C and 15N values of plants at the base of the food web.
In contrast with the other sites discussed so far, sites L67 and
Cell 3 do not show distinct 15N values among different trophic
groups (Figure 4). For example, at both of these sites, sailfin
molly (an herbivorous fish) has the same 15N value as that of
largemouth bass (a top predator). Does this result mean that the
two fish had eaten the same diet (i.e., only plants or large fish)?
Obviously, that conclusion is unrealistic.
A more likely explanation for the poor separation of trophic
groups by 15N is that mobile, longer-lived fish like bass (i.e.,
those occupying the upper trophic positions) migrate as water
levels change in the Everglades. As they forage in regions with
different biogeochemical reactions, their tissues begin to acquire
the isotopic values of their new diet. Thus, the relatively low 15N
values of largemouth bass, Florida gar, warmouth, bowfin, and
chain pickerel at L67 and Cell 3 (compared with those expected
based on the more herbivorous biota) probably reflect isotopic
labeling in other local food webs. For the dates collected, these sites appear not to be amenable to isotopic reconstruction of food
web structure.
![graph showing 3A-15 collection site for which stable nitrogen differentiates organisms occupying different trophic positions](images/fig3_3A-15.gif) |
![graph showing U3 collection site for which stable nitrogen differentiates organisms occupying different trophic positions](images/fig3_U3.gif) |
![graph showing L35B collection site for which stable nitrogen differentiates organisms occupying different trophic positions](images/fig3_L35B.gif) |
![graph showing F1 collection site for which stable nitrogen differentiates organisms occupying different trophic positions](images/fig3_F1.gif) |
Figure 3. (above) Collection sites for which 15N differentiates organisms occupying different trophic positions. Symbols are averages, with the number of organisms analyzed shown in parentheses. 3A-15 (January 1998); U3 (September 1997); L35B (January 1998); F1 (September 1997). [click on images above for larger image] |
|
![graph showing L67 collection site for which stable nitrogen does not help distinguish organisms occupying different relative trophic positions](images/fig4_L67.gif) |
![graph showing Cell 3 collection site for which stable nitrogen does not help distinguish organisms occupying different relative trophic positions](images/fig4_Cell3.gif) |
Figure 4. (above) Sites for which 15N does not help distinguish organisms occupying different relative trophic positions. Symbols are averages, with the number of organisms analyzed shown in parentheses. L67 (January 1998); Cell 3 (January 1998). [click on images above for larger image] |
|
The Influence of Local Biogeochemistry
In addition to providing clues about food web structure, this
dataset also provides valuable information about biogeochemical
processes in the Everglades environment. Differences in the 15N
and 13C ranges of organisms among sites (Figure 3 - Figure 4) suggest
that isotopic values largely reflect local biogeochemical
differences in the water column or sediments. Such processes include denitrification, which increases the 15N value of dissolved
nitrate, and methane production and subsequent oxidation, which
decrease the 13C value of dissolved CO2. The isotopic
compositions of aquatic plants and detritus appear to integrate
these isotopic signatures, and the patterns are reflected in the 15N
and 13C values of higher-level consumers in the aquatic food web.
Because there is considerable spatial variability in nutrient sources
and biogeochemical processes across the Everglades, it is difficult
to determine the trophic relationships in many locations. The large
15N variation in organisms throughout the food web at a given site
makes 15N values more useful than 13C for establishing relative
trophic positions. In contrast, the smaller trophic influence on 13C values (Figure 2A) and the large range of biota 13C values caused
by various environmental effects mean that the different trophic
positions within the food web do not separate significantly by 13C.
Instead, 13C appears to better reflect food web base (e.g., algae or
detritus).
Food Web Structure and Everglades Restoration
Improving the water quality in the Everglades is a critical goal
of restoration efforts in this ecosystem. Part of this effort has
focused on monitoring mercury concentrations in sport fish and
other organisms, with the goal of understanding the response of the
ecosystem to changes in water levels, contaminant loads, and other
factors. To provide the context for these measurements, we must
address how mercury accumulates to toxic levels in higher trophic
positions within the food web.
Nitrogen isotopes of organisms can discriminate among
relative trophic positions at some Everglades sites (and therefore
describe food web structure and bioaccumulation pathways), but
not at others. Spatial differences in biogeochemical reactions
across the Everglades complicate our ability to use isotopes for
this purpose. More importantly, monitoring chemical indicators in
organisms collected at a given site (e.g., isotopes, mercury
concentration) may result in misleading conclusions about what
those indicators mean if one assumes that the organisms do not
move. Longer-lived organisms that migrate seasonally and feed in
different regions of the Everglades likely reflect a weighted
average of chemical "labeling". The implications of this effect are
that monitoring mercury concentrations in large sport fish like
largemouth bass may not be an accurate measure of mercury
responses to restoration efforts at that site. Monitoring shorterlived
species that do not migrate into and out of a given collection
site may be a more effective approach toward assessing the success
of Everglades restoration.
Bryan E. Bemis and Carol Kendall
U.S. Geological Survey
345 Middlefield Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
References
Cabana, G. and Rasmussen, J.B., 1994. Modelling food chain structure and contaminant bioaccumulation using stable nitrogen isotopes. Nature, 372: 255-273.
Loftus, W.F., Trexler, J.C. and Jones, R.D., 1998. Mercury Transfer Through an Everglades Aquatic Food Web. Final Report, Contract SP-329, Florida Department of Environmental
Protection, Homestead, Florida.
McCutchan, J.H., Jr., Lewis, W.M., Jr., Kendall, C. and McGrath, C.C., 2003. Variation in trophic shift for stable isotope ratios of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur. OIKOS, 102: 378-390.
The data on which this Fact Sheet is based are available at the
website http://wwwrcamnl.wr.usgs.gov/isoig/projects/Everglades.
Related information is available at the website
http://sofia.usgs.gov/people/kendall.html.
For more information about isotopic studies in the Everglades, please contact:
Carol Kendall
U.S. Geological Survey
345 Middlefield Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Phone: (650) 329-4576
Email: ckendall@usgs.gov |
Download a PDF version of this factsheet (0.9 MB). Please note: you will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader in order to view this file.
|