USGS
South Florida Information Access
SOFIA home
Help
Projects
by Title
by Investigator
by Region
by Topic
by Program
Results
Publications
Meetings
South Florida Restoration Science Forum
Synthesis
Information
Personnel
About SOFIA
USGS Science Strategy
DOI Science Plan
Education
Upcoming Events
Data
Data Exchange
Metadata
geer > 2000 > poster > aquatic cycling of mercury in the everglades (acme) project: synopsis of phase I studies and plans for phase II studies

Aquatic Cycling of Mercury in the Everglades (ACME) Project: Synopsis of Phase I Studies and Plans for Phase II Studies

Poster presented December 2000, at the Greater Everglades Ecosystem Restoration Conference

David P. Krabbenhoft, Mark L. Olson, John DeWild (U.S. Geological Survey, Middleton, WI), Cynthia C. Gilmour (Academy of Natural Sciences, Benedict Estuarine Laboratory, St. Leonard, MD), William H. Orem (U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA), George R. Aiken (U.S. Geological Survey, Boulder, CO), Carol Kendall (U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA)

[ Disclaimer ]

Abstract

The Mercury Cycle in the Florida Everglades

illustration of the mercury cycle in the Everglades

[larger image]
In 1994, a consortium of agencies lead by the U.S. Geological Survey began a multi-investigator study of the factors contributing to the high levels of mercury (Hg) in Everglade's biota, the Aquatic Cycling of Mercury in the Everglades (ACME) project. The overall objective has been to understand Hg cycling well enough to create management strategies that will minimize methylmercury (MeHg) bioaccumulation in the Everglades, while fulfilling other management objectives such as nutrient reduction and natural hydroperiod restoration. Mercury contamination of the Everglades ecosystem is one of the most severe cases in the published literature. Currently, no human consumption of any Everglades' sport fish is recommended due to high Hg levels in fish tissues. Because virtually all Hg contained in edible fish is MeHg, acquiring a complete understanding of the processes controlling the environmental fate of MeHg is requisite to make responsible ecosystem management decisions. Necessary information includes, the precise locations and rates of MeHg production and destruction, environmental factors (such as water chemistry) that either exacerbate or mitigate MeHg production, and foodweb bioaccumulation pathways.

Synopsis – Phase I Studies (1995-1998)

The precise underpinnings of why wetlands, such as the Everglades, are susceptible to methylmercury production and bioaccumulation are not completely understood. High rates of microbial MeHg production in anaerobic, organic-rich sediments and advective flows of nutrient bearing water are probable causes. Previous work by the ACME project has revealed that mercury (Hg) and methylmercury (MeHg) distributions in water, sediment and biota show complex seasonal and spatial trends, and that the cycling rates of Hg and MeHg are so rapid that many measurements need to be conducted on a diel basis. In addition, in situ microbial processes and photochemical processes control MeHg levels at the ecosystem level. Mercury loads to the Everglades are dominantly derived from atmospheric sources, but toxicity is largely controlled by the relative rates of conversion to methylmercury, which in turn appears to be intimately associated with other complex biogeochemical cycles, such as the sulfate/sulfide cycle. Specific key finding of the ACME project are the following:

  1. MeHg bioaccumulation is driven by internal MeHg production, mainly in surface sediments;
  2. MeHg concentrations in all matrices (sediment, surface water, pore water, and biota) are maximal in the central Everglades (southern WCA2A, WCA2B and north-central WCA3);
  3. MeHg is somewhat lower in more pristine areas like Everglades National Park and WCA1, and much lower in the most eutrophic areas of WCA2A and the constructed nutrient-retention wetlands;
  4. The spatial MeHg pattern is not driven primarily by inorganic Hg concentration, although there is weak but significant relationship between Hg and MeHg concentrations in surface sediments;
  5. Photochemical reduction and photo-demethylation are important mechanisms for removal of mercury and destruction of MeHg, respectively, over much of the Everglades;
  6. Sulfur inputs from areas north of the Everglades have a large impact on MeHg production, but the magnitude and even direction of the impact varies with the sulfate and sulfide concentration;
  7. Phosphate and nitrate generally had no direct effect on MeHg production rates in sediment cores;
  8. Anaerobic microbial processes, including sulfate reduction, are key components of microbial organic carbon decomposition in Everglades sediment;
  9. Microbial dissimilatory sulfate reduction (rather than assimilation by plants) appears to be the most important mechanism for reduced sulfur storage in Everglades peat;
  10. Natural fires and extended periods of peat exposure can greatly exacerbate MeHg production (for example 10x increases in sediment MeHg levels), and this phenomenon appears to be driven by sediment oxidation and release of sulfate after re-inundation;
  11. Bioaccumulation of MeHg in Gambusia appears to be facilitated by the movement of benthic invertebrates (insects and zooplankton) into the water column, and less importantly by direct grazing on surface sediments and periphyton;
  12. Methylation occurs only in periphyton "mats" where microbial sulfur cycling occurs, and is most common in the less-calcareous periphyton found in eutrophic areas.

Plans – Phase II Studies (1999-2003)

In order to provide predictive capabilities of the potential effects of Everglades restoration efforts on Hg cycling, the complex relationships between loadings of Hg, sulfur, and nutrients on MeHg production and bioaccumulation need to be better understood. In the next phase of this research, we propose better quantify these individual relationships, and the interactions among these three key parameters, through amendments to in situ mesocosms. Short-term addition experiments are useful in examining processes, but may not predict long-term responses, for a number of reasons. Response of plant growth to nutrients is the obvious example, but other changes, like changes in Hg speciation and bioavailability over time, or development of microbial communities, are also important. An understanding of the relationship between Hg, S or nutrient loading and MeHg production and bioaccumulation requires a long-term, large-scale approach because there are many steps between the entry of "new" Hg to the ecosystem, its conversion to MeHg, and bioaccumulation in the foodweb.

We propose to use stable Hg isotope amendments to examine the relationship between Hg loading and MeHg production and bioaccumulation. This new approach will allow us to track the fate of newly deposited Hg separately from the larger existing pools, and to track the bioavailability of new Hg over time. The use of individual stable Hg isotopes will allow us to follow the cycle of new Hg added to the system, from initial partitioning, accumulation in vegetation, MeHg production and accumulation in sediments, fluxes and accumulation in the food web. We will also be able to trace burial, post-depositional reworking of Hg through sediments and plants, and Hg0 formation. Important unknowns that stable isotopes will allow us to address are the availability of Hg in decaying plant material relative to newly deposited Hg adsorbed to sediments for methylation; and the recycling of buried Hg to the sediment surface through plant growth and decay. We also propose to make sulfur amendments as either a stable or radioisotope for the same reason. Sulfur isotope additions will allow us to find out how fast sulfide is turned over is sediments and made available again for sulfate reduction (through photosynthetic re-oxidation of sulfide), a key variable in modeling the relationship between sulfate load, sulfate reduction rate and sulfide accumulation in the oligotrophic Everglades. Isotopes will also allow us to track what fraction of newly added sulfate is retained in sediments.

What is clean sampling, and what do we see from it?
photo of scientists collecting samples
[larger image]
Clean sampling involves the use of very clean sample containers and protective clothing to prevent sample contamination by field personnel. Generally, mercury and methylmercury levels are very low.
image of South Florida
[larger image]
South Florida map
[larger image]


Averages for Primary ACME Sites
[click on images to view larger version]

South Florida map
[larger image]
Hg -T (ng/L)
MeHg(ng/L)
%MeHg
2.2
0.03
pie chart of %MeHg
2.1
0.22
pie chart of %MeHg
3.1
0.11
pie chart of %MeHg
3.6
0.41
pie chart of %MeHg
2.4
0.48
pie chart of %MeHg
1.9
0.42
pie chart of %MeHg
2.6
0.22
pie chart of %MeHg
1.9
0.20
pie chart of %MeHg
1.2
0.10
pie chart of %MeHg


Estimating methylmercury fluxes from sediments
A story of rapid cycling...
photo of field site

[larger image]
WCA 3A-15 - 24 hr study, Jan-98
illustration of study set-up

[larger image]
Do Fickian approaches work in the Everglades? (fluxes for site 3A15, Jan and June, 1998)
graph of MeHg flux using 2 different approaches

[larger image]
24-hr Study, 3A-15
MeHg (ng L-1)
January 1998

depth profile of MeHg over 24hr

[larger image]


What is mercury methylation, and why do we care?
Mercury Methylation and Demethylation in the Everglades Ecosystem
illustration of mercury methylation and demethylation in the Everglades ecosystem

[larger image]
Mercury methylation is the process whereby mercury is converted into methylmercury, the most toxic form of mercury. Natural bacteria are largely for this process, but man's activities can exacerbate the net amount of methyl-mercury in the environment. Methyl-mercury is also destroyed by bacteria, so it is necessary to look at both the creation and destruction mechanisms.

  • The distributions of MeHg production and MeHg concentration are similar in space and time
  • MeHg and methylation in soils are maximal in the central Everglades (WCA 3A) and minimal in the northern eutrophic areas
summer average graphs
[larger image]


Everglades Transect: July '97 Surface (0.4 cm) Sediment

graph of MeHg degradation at various sites
[larger image]


The Photochemical Cycle and Mercury

Mercury and methylmercury have one of, if not the, most complicated environmental cycles of any known compound or element. This complex story is intensified by the fact that they are both "photo sensitive", or react with sunlight.

The Aquatic Mercury Cycle Conceptual Model
aquatic mercury cycle conceptual model

[larger image]
Production & Fate of Dissolved Gaseous Mercury in Surface Water
graph of production and fate of dissolved gaseous mercury in surface water
[larger image]
Photodegradation Rates for MeHg
graph of photodegradation rates for MeHg
[larger image]
illustration of photochemical processes
[larger image]


You are what you eat?

Bioaccumulation in the Everglades
illustration of bioaccumulation in the Everglades

[larger image]
With mercury, what you ingest largely determines what levels of mercury your body will contain. So, if you eat animals from near the top of the food chain, you have higher mercury levels. ACME has studied the diet of Mosquito Fish (Gambusia), and we have been able to determine where this small forage fish gets most of its mercury.

Average Diet for Marsh Mosquitofish based on gut contents analysis (Paul Garrison, unpubl. data, 1999)
Average Diet if Plants are not Digested (and hence do not contribute to growth)
pie chart of diet component percentages
calculated delta15N = -3.0 parts per thousand
[larger image]
pie chart of diet component percentages

calculated delta15N = -0.5 parts per thousand
[larger image]


MeHg Uptake Pathways for Gambusia

graph of MeHg uptake pathways for Gambusiakey for MeHg uptake pathways for Gambusia graph
[larger image]


Phase II ACME Research: Mesocosms And Isotopes.

photo of mesocosm chambers
[larger image]
In next phase of research, the ACME Team will be employing a new set of tools to examine the complex relations among mercury, sulfur and carbon in the Everglades to aid managers with difficult decisions on how to best manage the resource and hopefully make the mercury problem better. To do this, we will deploy in situ chambers (mesocosms) to conduct controlled experiments that are specifically designed to answer the most significant management questions surrounding mercury in the Everglades.

Predicted Ecosystem Response to Hg loading
graph of fish Hg and atmospheric Hg deposition
[larger image]
graph of fish Hg and time after load reduction
[larger image]


Click here for a printable version of this poster (note: document will open in a new browser window)

For more information contact:

David Krabbenhoft, U.S. Geological Survey, 8505 Research Way, Middleton, WI, 53562, Phone: 608-821-3843, Fax: 608-821-3817, dpkrabbe@usgs.gov

Related information:

SOFIA Project: Aquatic Cycling of Mercury in the Everglades

[ Disclaimer ]



| Disclaimer | Privacy Statement | Accessibility |

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
This page is: http://sofia.usgs.gov/geer/2000/posters/merc_cycle/index.html
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Last updated: 22 December, 2004 @ 07:41 AM (KP)